A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Whole Body Vibration Therapy With Usual Care and Usual Care to Improve Muscle Health in Older Adults
Effectiveness of Whole Body Vibration Therapy and Usual Care Compared to Usual Care in Improving Muscle Mass, Strength and Function in Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial where participants would be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups. One group would receive Whole body vibration therapy and usual care and the other group only usual care. Measurements of muscle mass, strength and function would be taken before the interventions, and at 2 other points after interventions. Differences in the outcomes between the two groups would be analysed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
April 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.2 years
September 25, 2025
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Isometric Knee Extension Strength
Measured using a JTech Medical, Northstar Echo Muscle Tester with subject seated with knee flexed at 90 degrees and hanging, muscle tester is placed at the ventral surface of the ankle between malleoli and subject instructed to push against tester with maximal effort to extend the knee. Best of three trials would be taken.
Baseline and 2 weeks after intervention and 3 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Hand Grip Strength
Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Appendicular Skeletal Mass Index
Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Gait Speed
Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention
5-timed chair stands
Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Calf Circumference
Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Participant Surveys
2 weeks post intervention up to 3 months post intervention
Exercise adherence
During 4 weeks intervention period
Semi-structured interviews
2 weeks post intervention up to 3 months post intervention
Study Arms (2)
Whole Body Vibration Training
EXPERIMENTALThe WBVT would be conducted using the Galileo Vibration machine (Galileo® S 35), for 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks. The participants would be progressed in terms of (i)vibration frequency from 15 Hz to at least 25 Hz (maximum 30 Hz for those who can tolerate) (ii)for the angles of their squats (from an approximate starting point of 20 degrees ("mini squats" to 45 degrees "quarter squats"; maximum to 90 degrees-thighs parallel to ground or "half-squats" for those who can tolerate); as well as (iii) increasing number of each 1-minute set (from 6 to 8 sets), while standing on the WBVT machine barefoot with both feet flat on the platform set at an amplitude of 2-3mm (according to the participant's height and body physique) with variable rest breaks (up to 1 minute) between each set for a total of 15 minutes each training session. Any missed session would be recorded. To ensure compliance, the subjects would receive a standard phone-call/text reminder prior to the scheduled session.
Usual Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants from both arms would also be provided the exercise sheet on "Otago exercises" (30)and demonstrated in one session how to perform the exercises. In-person demonstration of the "Otago exercises" would be done upon recruitment by trained study team members, at the visit for baseline measurements and a return-demonstration would be done after. They would be instructed to perform the Otago exercises daily according to the standardized instructions stated and progressed from 10 to 15 repetitions on their own for at least 3 times a week and advised to also continue other aerobic exercises, for example, brisk walking. Participants would be given an exercise and falls diary to record their exercise participation as well as any falls that occurred during the study duration for up to 3 months.
Interventions
Information already included in arm/group descriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Volunteer or Patients aged 65 and above,
- Clinical frailty Scale (CFS) score of 3-4,
- Independently ambulating without any aid
- willingness and consent to participate in the study and ability to travel to the study-site for the measurements and interventions, and
- participants with no regular exercise habits (defined as less than 150mins/week of moderate intensity aerobic exercise and less than twice a week of strengthening exercises)for past 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- current active enrolment into any Day Rehab or community exercise program,
- contraindications to WBVT machine usage (see below),
- diagnosis of dementia,
- history of Diabetes Mellitus
- BMI ≤20kg/m2,
- recent hospital admissions within the last 3 months,
- end stage organ failure,
- chronic diseases which are not well managed, for example, poorly controlled hypertension,
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) score II and above for patients with history of heart failure and
- MUST Score ≥1.
- Contraindications to WBVT:
- PRIMARY CONTRAINDICATIONS TO WBVT
- Pregnancy
- Acute thrombosis (acute vascular occlusion)
- Artificial joints in stimulated body regions
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Changi General Hospitallead
- BMEC Pte Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (28)
Dyer SM, Crotty M, Fairhall N, Magaziner J, Beaupre LA, Cameron ID, Sherrington C; Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Rehabilitation Research Special Interest Group. A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0332-0.
PMID: 27590604BACKGROUNDAkehurst H, Grice JE, Angioi M, Morrissey D, Migliorini F, Maffulli N. Whole-body vibration decreases delayed onset muscle soreness following eccentric exercise in elite hockey players: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02760-4.
PMID: 34641941BACKGROUNDBorg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.
PMID: 7154893BACKGROUNDLee SY, Goh A, Tan K, Choo PL, Ong PH, Wong WP, Wee SL. Effectiveness of a community-delivered pneumatic machine resistance training programme (Gym Tonic) for older adults at neighbourhood senior centres - a randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021 Oct 7;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s11556-021-00273-x.
PMID: 34620081BACKGROUNDClaflin DR, Larkin LM, Cederna PS, Horowitz JF, Alexander NB, Cole NM, Galecki AT, Chen S, Nyquist LV, Carlson BM, Faulkner JA, Ashton-Miller JA. Effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on the contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers from young and older humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Oct;111(4):1021-30. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01119.2010. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
PMID: 21799130BACKGROUNDBurd NA, West DW, Staples AW, Atherton PJ, Baker JM, Moore DR, Holwerda AM, Parise G, Rennie MJ, Baker SK, Phillips SM. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 9;5(8):e12033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033.
PMID: 20711498BACKGROUNDYoshiko A, Watanabe K. Author Correction: Impact of home-based squat training with two-depths on lower limb muscle parameters and physical functional tests in older adults. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95096-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 34326445BACKGROUNDChew STH, Kayambu G, Lew CCH, Ng TP, Ong F, Tan J, Tan NC, Tham SL. Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care. BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 17;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02240-8.
PMID: 34001023BACKGROUNDCurrier BS, Mcleod JC, Banfield L, Beyene J, Welton NJ, D'Souza AC, Keogh JAJ, Lin L, Coletta G, Yang A, Colenso-Semple L, Lau KJ, Verboom A, Phillips SM. Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;57(18):1211-1220. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106807. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
PMID: 37414459BACKGROUNDHurst C, Robinson SM, Witham MD, Dodds RM, Granic A, Buckland C, De Biase S, Finnegan S, Rochester L, Skelton DA, Sayer AA. Resistance exercise as a treatment for sarcopenia: prescription and delivery. Age Ageing. 2022 Feb 2;51(2):afac003. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac003.
PMID: 35150587BACKGROUNDWu S, Ning HT, Xiao SM, Hu MY, Wu XY, Deng HW, Feng H. Effects of vibration therapy on muscle mass, muscle strength and physical function in older adults with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Sep 17;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s11556-020-00247-5. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32963629BACKGROUNDYi M, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhou J, Wang Z. The effectiveness of Otago exercise program in older adults with frailty or pre-frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Nov;114:105083. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105083. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
PMID: 37390692BACKGROUNDLam FM, Lau RW, Chung RC, Pang MY. The effect of whole body vibration on balance, mobility and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2012 Jul;72(3):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 18.
PMID: 22609157BACKGROUNDRemer F, Keilani M, Kull P, Crevenna R. Effects of whole-body vibration therapy on pain, functionality, postural stability, and proprioception in patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025 Feb;175(1-2):20-40. doi: 10.1007/s10354-023-01026-4. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
PMID: 37999785BACKGROUNDGloeckl R, Heinzelmann I, Kenn K. Whole body vibration training in patients with COPD: A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2015 Aug;12(3):212-21. doi: 10.1177/1479972315583049. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
PMID: 25904085BACKGROUNDNowak-Lis A, Nowak Z, Gabrys T, Szmatlan-Gabrys U, Batalik L, Knappova V. The Use of Vibration Training in Men after Myocardial Infarction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 11;19(6):3326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063326.
PMID: 35329010BACKGROUNDQiu CG, Chui CS, Chow SKH, Cheung WH, Wong RMY. Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Mar 29;54:jrm00266. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2032.
PMID: 35174868BACKGROUNDYang X, Xue X, Tu H, Li N. Effect of whole-body vibration training on the recovery of lower limb function in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Nov;45(23):3823-3832. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2138993. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
PMID: 36367314BACKGROUNDCostantino C, Bertuletti S, Romiti D. Efficacy of Whole-Body Vibration Board Training on Strength in Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Jul;28(4):339-349. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000466.
PMID: 28657911BACKGROUNDLai CC, Tu YK, Wang TG, Huang YT, Chien KL. Effects of resistance training, endurance training and whole-body vibration on lean body mass, muscle strength and physical performance in older people: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):367-373. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy009.
PMID: 29471456BACKGROUNDBillot M, Calvani R, Urtamo A, Sanchez-Sanchez JL, Ciccolari-Micaldi C, Chang M, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Wirnsberger G, Sinclair A, Vaquero-Pinto N, Jyvakorpi S, Ohman H, Strandberg T, Schols JMGA, Schols AMWJ, Smeets N, Topinkova E, Michalkova H, Bonfigli AR, Lattanzio F, Rodriguez-Manas L, Coelho-Junior H, Broccatelli M, D'Elia ME, Biscotti D, Marzetti E, Freiberger E. Preserving Mobility in Older Adults with Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Physical Activity Interventions. Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 16;15:1675-1690. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253535. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32982201BACKGROUNDNg TP, Feng L, Nyunt MS, Feng L, Niti M, Tan BY, Chan G, Khoo SA, Chan SM, Yap P, Yap KB. Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Med. 2015 Nov;128(11):1225-1236.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
PMID: 26159634BACKGROUNDLim WS, Cheong CY, Lim JP, Tan MMY, Chia JQ, Malik NA, Tay L. Singapore Clinical Practice Guidelines For Sarcopenia: Screening, Diagnosis, Management and Prevention. J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(4):348-369. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2022.59.
PMID: 36346721BACKGROUNDChen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, Peng LN, Sugimoto K, Tanaka T, Won CW, Yamada M, Zhang T, Akishita M, Arai H. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
PMID: 32033882BACKGROUNDDent E, Lien C, Lim WS, Wong WC, Wong CH, Ng TP, Woo J, Dong B, de la Vega S, Hua Poi PJ, Kamaruzzaman SBB, Won C, Chen LK, Rockwood K, Arai H, Rodriguez-Manas L, Cao L, Cesari M, Chan P, Leung E, Landi F, Fried LP, Morley JE, Vellas B, Flicker L. The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018. Erratum In: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.09.010.
PMID: 28648901BACKGROUNDDent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1376-1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4.
PMID: 31609229BACKGROUNDDent E, Chapman I, Howell S, Piantadosi C, Visvanathan R. Frailty and functional decline indices predict poor outcomes in hospitalised older people. Age Ageing. 2014 Jul;43(4):477-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft181. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24257468BACKGROUNDHoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6.
PMID: 31609228BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2025
First Posted
October 3, 2025
Study Start
January 10, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared at this time because participants were not explicitly consented for data sharing.