NCT04012762

Brief Summary

Application dose standards have not yet been determined for Whole Body Vibration Training which is subject to studies with different frequencies and amplitudes. Our objective was to examine acute responses of two different vibration training doses on muscle tone, strength, and flexibility.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 5, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 8, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 10, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 8, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Muscle Power, Muscle Flexibility, Muscle Tone, Whole-Body Vibration Training.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Muscle Tone

    Tone assessments were made by MyotonPro Digital Palpation Device.

    30 minute

  • Muscle power

    The muscle power evaluation was made by Lafayette Manuel Muscle Testing System.

    30 minute

  • Flexibility

    Hamstring flexibility was evaluated with Sit and Reach Test.

    30 minute

Study Arms (2)

Moderate-intensity group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

WBVT application was 2-4 mm for vibration amplitude value and 25 Hz for training frequency in moderate-intensity group.

Device: Whole body vibration training

Vigorous-intensity group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

WBVT application was 2-4 mm for vibration amplitude value and 40 Hz for training frequency in vigorous-intensity group.

Device: Whole body vibration training

Interventions

Intermittent whole-body vibration exposure is a training method providing physical stimulation effect on skeletal muscles by increasing gravitational acceleration on the vibration platform.

Moderate-intensity groupVigorous-intensity group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy and untrained participants.
  • Dominant side of the participants was recorded and only right dominant individuals were included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with body weight over 120 kg.
  • Participants had lower extremity trauma and lower extremity movement restriction.
  • Participants who had any cardiovascular or neurological conditions, dizziness or vertigo

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Okan University

Tuzla, İ̇stanbul, 34959, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Officials

  • Emine Atıcı, Ph. D.

    Okan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2019

First Posted

July 9, 2019

Study Start

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion

July 5, 2019

Study Completion

July 8, 2019

Last Updated

July 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations