Pain Control With Caudal Epidural vs. Combined Caudal Epidural and Lumbar Sympathetic Block .
CLEARS
The Analgesic Effect of Caudal Epidural Versus Combined Lumbar Sympathetic Block With Caudal Epidural in Patients Undergoing Redo Lumbar Surgery: A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparing the analgesic effect of caudal epidural versus combined lumbar sympathetic block with caudal epidural in patients undergoing redo spinal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
September 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
September 14, 2025
September 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale - NRS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where patients rate their pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). NRS scores will be compared between the two groups (caudal epidural block vs. combined lumbar sympathetic and caudal epidural block) to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the interventions.
over 3 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Postoperative pain intensity (NRS)
over 24 hours after surgery
Time to first postoperative analgesic request
postoperative period up to hospital discharge
Total postoperative morphine consumption
postoperative period up to hospital discharge
Long-term pain relief using WHO pain relief criteria
over 3 months after the procedure
Functional recovery and ambulation (EuroQol)
over 3 months postoperative
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group C
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup C (n=32): this group will receive fluoroscopy guided caudal epidural block. Under fluoroscopic guidance and the patients in prone position, caudal epidural injection will be achieved. A pillow will be inserted under the pelvic bones for better exposure and accessibility of thesacral hiatus. Betadine will be used for sterilization of the sacrococcygeal area and palpation of the coccygeal tip. Upon localization of the sacral hiatus, a 22-gauge, 3.5-inch length spinal needle (Spinocan®, BRAUN, Melsungen, Germany) with the image intensifier will be used to inject 1 mL of contrast media (Omnipaque 300; GE Healthcare, Carrigtohill, Co. Cork, Ireland). After confirming the right needle position and excluding intravascular, intrathecal, and soft tissue infiltration, 10 cc of the treatment drug (8 ml of 0.5%lidocaine mixed with 2ml of 8 mg dexamethasone) will be injected.
Group LC
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup LC: Group (n=32): this group will receive combined fluoroscopy guided caudal epidural block and lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Under fluoroscopic guidance, LSGB will be performed. The block level and side will be determined. Patients will be kept in the prone position while C-arm (GE OEC 9900 C- of the anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral view are examined to verify the correct entrance sit. The skin will be prepared in an aseptic manner. Approach the anterolateral border of the inferior sec of the L2 vertebral body or the upper portion of the L3 vertebral body of the affected side where the pain exists, using a 21-gauge Chiba needle. Following the confirmation of the needle location via fluoroscopic imaging, an aspiration test will be performed in order to rule out the presence of blood, following by injection of a contrast medium. Following that, 2 mL of 8mg dexamethasone will be diluted with 8 mL of 1% lidocaine and injected unilaterally at one level.
Interventions
Under fluoroscopic guidance, the patient in the prone position will receive a caudal epidural injection through the sacral hiatus. A 22-gauge, 3.5-inch spinal needle (Spinocan®, BRAUN) is used to inject 1 mL of contrast media (Omnipaque 300) to confirm correct needle placement. Then, 10 mL of treatment solution (8 mL of 0.5% lidocaine and 2 mL of 8 mg dexamethasone) is administered.
Patients will receive both a caudal epidural block and a lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) under fluoroscopic guidance. The LSGB is performed at the L2 or L3 vertebral body on the affected side using a 21-gauge Chiba needle. After confirming needle position with contrast imaging, 10 mL of solution (2 mL of 8 mg dexamethasone + 8 mL of 1% lidocaine) is injected. A caudal block is then performed as described above.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 40-70 years.
- Both sexes.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III.
- Undergoing lumbar spine surgery level L4-5/ L5-S1 for the second time.
- Duration of chronic low back pain \> 3months.
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgeries.
- Bleeding disorder.
- patient refusal for the procedure.
- Pregnancy.
- Neoplastic diseases, allergies to contrast.
- Liver failure or kidney failure .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hebatullah Mohammed Abdelmageedlead
- Cairo Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kasr Al-Ainy Medical School, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Hebatullah Mohammed Abdelmageed, Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2025
First Posted
September 30, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 20, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Participant privacy and confidentiality concerns; data sharing is not permitted under institutional policy.