NCT07197398

Brief Summary

This study is designed to assess possible relation between the anthropometric data of pregnant women at term, as well as their babies, and the maximal level of sensory blockade following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. The debate regarding this relation is ongoing. Although there is some relevant data in favor of both lack and the presence of significant relation between these variables, it is still not clear whether the same dose of local anesthetic is similarly effective, regardless of parturient's and fetal size.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
183

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 18, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

spinal anesthesiacesarean sectionspinal dosespinal block level

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessed variable - block level correlation coefficient

    Regression and correlation analysis will be employed to assess the relation between pregnancy-related, maternal and neonatal data and the level of sensory block. For the purpose of statistical analysis the level of block will be converted into numbers for more reliable outcome.

    Highest level of sensory block noted from the time of spinal injection until the end of surgical procedure

Study Arms (1)

Parturients given spinal block with 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine

Hospital's electronic database will be searched in order to identify elective cases of cesarean sections performed under spinal anesthesia. After that, a manual review of each case will follow and only those where the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine used for spinal block was 12.5mg will be chosen for further analysis. Anesthetic records of these cases will be retrieved and assessed for its quality, clarity and completeness. During the process of further analysis an anonymized data will be retrieved and moved to Excel file: demographic and pregnancy - related data of the parturient, spinal block - related data (technique and dynamic of the sensory blockade, maternal hemodynamic parameters) and neonatal data (birthweight). Special attention will be paid to assure that all data is accessible only for investigators and remain anonymous throughout the analysis process.

Other: Spinal block level analysisOther: Data collectionOther: Sub-group analysis

Interventions

Relation of pregnancy - related, maternal and neonatal data to the level of sensory blockade in the whole study group will be assessed. Only cases with 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be included.

Parturients given spinal block with 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine

Intervention is to retrieve and analyse anonymous perioperative data. After identification of eligible cases, statistical analysis will be performed

Parturients given spinal block with 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine

Relation of pregnancy - related, maternal and neonatal data to the level of sensory blockade in the sub-groups of different height (\<165cm and \>165cm) will also be performed.

Parturients given spinal block with 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study population will be chosen from the cases of elective cesarean sections that took place in years 2017-2022 in Orlowski Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland. Intention is to include at least 140 cases for good quality analysis

You may qualify if:

  • Cesarean delivery at term under spinal anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status \<3
  • BMI\<40

You may not qualify if:

  • Spinal anesthesia with the dose different than 12.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine
  • Local anesthetic other than hyperbaric bupivacaine used
  • Failed spinal anesthesia
  • Poor quality of anesthetic record - required data not available

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education,Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care

Warsaw, 01-813, Poland

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ozkan Seyhan T, Orhan-Sungur M, Basaran B, Savran Karadeniz M, Demircan F, Xu Z, Sessler DI. The effect of intra-abdominal pressure on sensory block level of single-shot spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Feb;24(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

    PMID: 25499016BACKGROUND
  • Bialowolska K, Horosz B, Sekowska A, Malec-Milewska M. Fixed Dose versus Height-Adjusted Conventional Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Caesarean Delivery: A Prospective, Double-Blinded Randomised Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 8;9(11):3600. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113600.

    PMID: 33171677BACKGROUND
  • Wei CN, Zhou QH, Wang LZ. Abdominal girth and vertebral column length aid in predicting intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose for elective cesarean section. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(34):e7905. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007905.

    PMID: 28834913BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Data Collection

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Małgorzata Malec-Milewska, MD, Prof.

    Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Orlowski Hospital, Warsaw

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2025

First Posted

September 29, 2025

Study Start

September 18, 2025

Primary Completion

November 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations