Intravenous Methadone Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia Following Cesarean Delivery
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in opioid requirements at 0-48 hours after scheduled cesarean delivery in patients receiving 150 mcg intrathecal morphine compared to 0.2 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg) intravenous methadone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 23, 2025
CompletedJanuary 5, 2026
December 1, 2025
7 months
February 10, 2025
December 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total opioid consumption
Total opioid consumption of either intrathecal opiate or intravenous methadone at 24-48 hours after delivery.
24 hours post-delivery, 48 hours post-delivery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) Scoring Tool
24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at rest
12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 7 days
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for movement-evoked pain
12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 7 days
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in previous 24 hours
12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 7 days
Pruritus
12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Spinal Anesthesia with Intravenous Methadone
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive spinal anesthesia (intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl) with intravenous methadone
Spinal Anesthesia with Intrathecal Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will receive spinal anesthesia (intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl) with intrathecal morphine
Interventions
Subjects will receive standardized spinal anesthesia without intrathecal morphine (intrathecal 1.6-2 mL 0.75% bupivacaine + dextrose, 15 mcg fentanyl) and intravenous methadone (0.2mg/kg total body weight up to max dose of 20 mg, with saline added to make total volume 2 mL) The Intravenous line (IV) methadone will be administered after cord clamping and administration of uterotonics with the dose of medication divided into 4 equal aliquots each administered 5 minutes apart.
Subjects will receive standardized spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine 150 micrograms and no methadone (2cc dose of IV normal saline) The Intravenous line (IV) saline will be administered after cord clamping and administration of uterotonics with the dose of medication divided into 4 equal aliquots each administered 5 minutes apart.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking
- Age over 18 years old
- Scheduled cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication to the administration of a spinal technique for anesthesia
- History of intolerance or adverse reaction to opioid medications
- History of chronic pain, opioid use \>30 OME/day, or substance use disorder
- History of obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or respiratory compromise (SpO2 \<92% on room air, or has a pre-existing oxygen requirement)
- History of liver or kidney failure
- Diagnosis of pre-eclampsia with current pregnancy
- Depression requiring more than one medication
- Planned use of CSE technique
- BMI \>50.0 kg/m2
- ASA status IV, V
- No prior history of an ECG demonstrating QTc \> 440ms
- Surgical complication requiring conversion to general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emily E Sharpe, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2025
First Posted
February 14, 2025
Study Start
February 12, 2025
Primary Completion
September 14, 2025
Study Completion
September 23, 2025
Last Updated
January 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share