Feasibility Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Magnetic Bead Tracking System When Used With a Bionic External Prosthesis
A Feasibility Study Evaluating the Magnetic Bead Tracking System and Its Safety and Effectiveness When Used With a Bionic External Prosthesis to Improve Prosthetic Controllability for Persons With Transtibial Amputation
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigation is an early feasibility study in up to 5 subjects, in which the primary objective is to capture preliminary safety and effectiveness information on the Magnetic Bead Tracking system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for early_phase_1
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedSeptember 26, 2025
September 1, 2025
7 months
September 11, 2025
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Walking Speed
The preferred and fastest walking speeds across level-ground and uneven walking surfaces will be measured as the primary study variables for AIM 1. To make these measurements, the time duration will be measured for each study subject to walk at steady state speed overground across 10m walkways at their preferred and fastest walking speeds. Subjects will receive standardized instructions encouraging them to either walk at their comfortable walking speed, or at their maximum walking speed, across each level-ground andan uneven 10m walkway. The investigators expect that the preferred and maximum speeds will be higher when employing the magnetomicrometry (MM) prosthetic controller compared to the commercial intrinsic controller, in support of the H1 hypothesis.
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Obstacle course speed
The time to traverse an obstacle course will be evaluated to test obstacle avoidance, changes in walking direction, slope/stair variations, and speed transients, testing the ability of each controller to deliver rapid gait maneuvers while subjects walk across the unstructured environment. The investigators expect that the time to complete the obstacle course will be lower when employing the MM controller compared to the commercial intrinsic controller, further supporting the H1 hypothesis.
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Walking Distance
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Gait Symmetry
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Biologic Realism
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Musculoskeletal Stress
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
Stability (1)
One timepoint, between days 150-180.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Transtibial amputees
EXPERIMENTALUp to five subjects signing an informed consent and meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled into the study to receive the Magnetic Bead Tracking System. Each subject will serve as their own control in a repeated measures ('within subjects') design. During experimentation, each subject will have prosthetic gait performance measured while using the Magnetic Bead Tracking System compared to an intrinsic robotic controller.
Interventions
The Magnetic Beads will be implanted in a subject during either an already required revision of an existing unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation or during the performance of a unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female age 22-65 at the time of surgery.
- The patient must already have an existing unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation requiring revision or a medical condition requiring performance of a unilateral or bilateral transtibial amputation.
- If the patient does not already have an amputation, the patient must have undergone independent consultation with a lower extremity surgical specialist to ensure they have exhausted all limb salvage options prior to undergoing amputation, as well as a psychiatric evaluation to ensure appropriate capacity and volition, and a pain medicine evaluation to ensure that all pain control options outside of amputation have been addressed.
- The patient must have the ability to ambulate at variable cadence (an expected lower extremity prosthesis functional level of K3 or above, as determined by a trained and certified prosthetist and confirmed by study investigators, through use of a patient history and physical examination).
- The patient must have adequate soft tissue bulk and muscle mass present in the operative limb to support appropriate wound healing.
- The patient must demonstrate volitional activation of the muscles into which magnet placement is intended.
- In the opinion of the investigator, the patient must likely be able to tolerate the pressure of a prosthetic socket during ambulation post-operatively.
- In the opinion of the investigator, the patient must have absence of any physical limitations, addictive diseases or underlying medical conditions that may preclude the patient from being a good study candidate.
- The patient must have willingness, ability and commitment to participate in baseline and follow-up evaluations for the full length of the study.
- The patient must have willingness and ability to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any active skin disease in the subject limb.
- Patients with severe comorbidity, atypical skeletal anatomy, or poor general physical/mental health that, in the opinion of the Investigator, will not allow the patients to be a good study candidate (i.e., other disease processes, mental capacity, substance abuse, shortened life. expectancy, vulnerable patient population, etc.).
- Patients with the following concurrent diseases: active infection or dormant bacteria, metabolic bone disease and/or metastatic lesions in the residual tibia.
- Patients weighing over 285 lbs. with the prosthesis, at time of screening.
- Patients for whom skeletal growth is not complete. Completed skeletal growth is defined through the finding of generally closed epiphyseal zones on X-ray.
- Patients with advanced atrophic muscle and/or compromised soft tissue coverage in the operative limb.
- Patients with evidence of or a documented history of severe peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus (type I or type II), skin diseases, neuropathy or neuropathic disease and severe phantom pain, or osteoporosis, such that, in the opinion of the investigator, will not allow the patient to be a good study candidate.
- Patient with a history of systemically administered corticosteroids, immune-suppressive therapy or chemotherapy drugs within six (6) months of implant surgery.
- Patients with a known need of future MRIs.
- Patients currently involved in another clinical study where that participation may conflict or interfere with the treatment, follow-up or results of this clinical study.
- Active smokers will be excluded from candidacy; those patients willing to undergo tobacco cessation will need to be completely abstinent from tobacco use for at least 6 weeks preoperatively.
- Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the first twelve (12) months of the post-surgical follow-up.
- Patient having an allergy to any component of the device.
- Patients with concurrent illness, disability or geographical residence that would hamper attendance at required study visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew J. Carty, M.D.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2025
First Posted
September 26, 2025
Study Start
September 11, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
All IPD that underlie results in a publication.