NCT07178158

Brief Summary

Addiction is a brain disorder characterized by a broad range of both apparent and subtle cognitive impairments in attention, memory, executive functions, and decision-making. These cognitive problems are clinically significant and may contribute to poor treatment outcomes in people with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs), such as a high risk of dropout, low treatment compliance, and shorter periods of abstinence. Studies on cognitive function in SUDs reveal that chronic use of drugs and alcohol can also negatively affect another crucial component of cognition: awareness, or metacognition. Metacognition is defined as an individual's ability to perceive and understand their cognitive functions and use this understanding to regulate them. One of the key consequences of metacognitive impairments is the lack of insight in people with SUDs, which adversely affects treatment outcomes. Substance users with poor metacognition are more reluctant to initiate or continue treatment and are more likely to deny their cognitive problems. Therefore, improving metacognition may remove or reduce motivational barriers to invest time and effort in the recovery process in general, and in the brain recovery process specifically. Despite the importance of neurocognition and metacognition in the recovery process for substance users, there is a dearth of interventions designed to target these functions.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Jul 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Expected
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2027

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

July 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

tES/TMA: Transcranial electrical stimulationCT: Cognitive TrainingDASES: Drug Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Feasibility of recruiting for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention

    The recruitment rate is quantified as the % of all participants who satisfy the inclusion criteria and agree to participate.

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Retention/adherence rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) Intervention

    Retention/adherence rate is quantified as the % of participants who remain enrolled until the end of the study, completing all NIPA sessions and pre- and post-assessments.

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Completion rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention

    Completion rate, indexing the number of training sessions completed by each participant.

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Measure acceptability of the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention

    Acceptability is measured with a 10-item questionnaire that uses a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. Items include perceived enjoyment, convenience, informativeness, applicability, effectiveness, satisfaction, continued use, barriers to use, and most/least liked aspects.

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Assess Drug Knowledge

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Measure attitudes towards drugs and alcohol

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Intention for Substance Use

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Metacognitive Awareness

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Negative Affect-Anxiety

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Negative Affect- Depression

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • Drug Abstinence Self-efficacy

    Baseline through 4 week intervention

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

The intervention condition

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention condition consists of TAU plus four \~20-minute long NIPA sessions, administered a week apart (NIPA+TAU). Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.

Other: Installing the Metacognium software app

Control condition

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The control condition consists of treatment as usual (TAU) consisting of medication treatment (buprenorphine) and group or individual behavior therapy. Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.

Other: Continue treatment as usual

Interventions

Continue your treatment schedule as usual with the for 4 weeks.

Control condition

Participants in the NIPA+TAU group will be sent two, URL's (one for iOS and one for Android) for installing the Metacognium software app, which hosts the four NIPA sessions. Participants will be provided with unique ID for registering and using the program on the Metacognium app. The NIPA sessions will be locked until participants have completed their baseline assessment. Once participants complete each NIPA session, they will receive an email and/or text notifying them that the next session is unlocked and that they can proceed to complete it.

The intervention condition

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • current DSM-5 opioid and/or stimulant use disorder
  • currently on medication treatment for SUD
  • owning a smartphone with sufficient functionality to download and utilize the NIPA app.

You may not qualify if:

  • current psychosis, mania, or suicidal/homicidal ideation
  • non-English speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Rezapour T, McLean KL, Psederska E, Maleki KN, Ekhtiari H, Vassileva J. Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction: a conceptual and feasibility study. Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12;16:1527828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1527828. eCollection 2025.

    PMID: 40012711BACKGROUND
  • Barkley, RA. Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS) New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.

    BACKGROUND
  • Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

    PMID: 12703651BACKGROUND
  • Heckman CJ, Dykstra JL, Collins BN. Substance-Related Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior among College Students: Opportunities for Health Education. Health Educ J. 2011 Dec;70(4):383-399. doi: 10.1177/0017896910379694.

    PMID: 22303033BACKGROUND
  • Hiller ML, Broome KM, Knight K, Simpson DD. Measuring self-efficacy among drug-involved probationers. Psychol Rep. 2000 Apr;86(2):529-38. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.529.

    PMID: 10840908BACKGROUND
  • Khazaee-Pool M, Naghibi SA, Pashaei T, Chaleshgar-Kordasiabi M, Daneshnia M, Ponnet K. Drug Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale (DASES): psychometric properties of the Farsi version. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Jan 3;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00336-9.

    PMID: 33388062BACKGROUND
  • Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2012). Monetary Choice Questionnaire [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.1037/t10044-000

    BACKGROUND
  • Lins de Holanda Coelho G, H P Hanel P, Vilar R, P Monteiro R, Gouveia VV, R Maio G. Need for Affect and Attitudes Toward Drugs: The Mediating Role of Values. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53(13):2232-2239. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1467454. Epub 2018 May 4.

    PMID: 29727251BACKGROUND
  • Manser P, Poikonen H, de Bruin ED. Feasibility, usability, and acceptance of "Brain-IT"-A newly developed exergame-based training concept for the secondary prevention of mild neurocognitive disorder: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Sep 21;15:1163388. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1163388. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37810620BACKGROUND
  • Meredith LR, Maralit AM, Thomas SE, Rivers SL, Salazar CA, Anton RF, Tomko RL, Squeglia LM. Piloting of the Just Say Know prevention program: a psychoeducational approach to translating the neuroscience of addiction to youth. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1770777. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

    PMID: 32687415BACKGROUND
  • Schalet BD, Pilkonis PA, Yu L, Dodds N, Johnston KL, Yount S, Riley W, Cella D. Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.036. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

    PMID: 26931289BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Jasmin Vassileva, Ph.D.

    Virginia Commonwealth University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a pilot feasibility two-arm, randomized controlled study with parallel assignment and 1:1 allocation of individuals with SUDs who are currently in treatment to either (1) Intervention condition: NIPA + treatment as usual (TAU); or (2) Control condition: TAU only. The control condition (TAU) consists of medication treatment (buprenorphine) and group or individual behavior therapy. The intervention condition (NIPA+TAU) consists of TAU plus four \~20-minute long NIPA sessions, administered a week apart. Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two phenotypic assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2025

First Posted

September 17, 2025

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations