Enhancing Addiction Treatment Through Psychoeducation
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Addiction is a brain disorder characterized by a broad range of both apparent and subtle cognitive impairments in attention, memory, executive functions, and decision-making. These cognitive problems are clinically significant and may contribute to poor treatment outcomes in people with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs), such as a high risk of dropout, low treatment compliance, and shorter periods of abstinence. Studies on cognitive function in SUDs reveal that chronic use of drugs and alcohol can also negatively affect another crucial component of cognition: awareness, or metacognition. Metacognition is defined as an individual's ability to perceive and understand their cognitive functions and use this understanding to regulate them. One of the key consequences of metacognitive impairments is the lack of insight in people with SUDs, which adversely affects treatment outcomes. Substance users with poor metacognition are more reluctant to initiate or continue treatment and are more likely to deny their cognitive problems. Therefore, improving metacognition may remove or reduce motivational barriers to invest time and effort in the recovery process in general, and in the brain recovery process specifically. Despite the importance of neurocognition and metacognition in the recovery process for substance users, there is a dearth of interventions designed to target these functions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
June 9, 2026
June 1, 2026
10 months
July 25, 2025
June 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility of recruiting for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
The recruitment rate is quantified as the % of all participants who satisfy the inclusion criteria and agree to participate.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Retention/adherence rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) Intervention
Retention/adherence rate is quantified as the % of participants who remain enrolled until the end of the study, completing all NIPA sessions and pre- and post-assessments.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Completion rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
Completion rate, indexing the number of training sessions completed by each participant.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Measure acceptability of the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
Acceptability is measured with a 10-item questionnaire that uses a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. Items include perceived enjoyment, convenience, informativeness, applicability, effectiveness, satisfaction, continued use, barriers to use, and most/least liked aspects.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Assess Drug Knowledge
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Measure attitudes towards drugs and alcohol
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Intention for Substance Use
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Metacognitive Awareness
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Other Outcomes (5)
Negative Affect-Anxiety
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Negative Affect- Depression
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Drug Abstinence Self-efficacy
Baseline through 4 week intervention
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
The intervention condition
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention condition consists of TAU plus four \~20-minute long NIPA sessions, administered a week apart (NIPA+TAU). Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.
Control condition
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control condition consists of treatment as usual (TAU) consisting of medication treatment (buprenorphine) and group or individual behavior therapy. Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.
Interventions
Continue your treatment schedule as usual with the for 4 weeks.
Participants in the NIPA+TAU group will be sent two, URL's (one for iOS and one for Android) for installing the Metacognium software app, which hosts the four NIPA sessions. Participants will be provided with unique ID for registering and using the program on the Metacognium app. The NIPA sessions will be locked until participants have completed their baseline assessment. Once participants complete each NIPA session, they will receive an email and/or text notifying them that the next session is unlocked and that they can proceed to complete it.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- current DSM-5 opioid and/or stimulant use disorder
- currently on medication treatment for SUD
- owning a smartphone with sufficient functionality to download and utilize the NIPA app.
You may not qualify if:
- current psychosis, mania, or suicidal/homicidal ideation
- non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Related Publications (11)
Rezapour T, McLean KL, Psederska E, Maleki KN, Ekhtiari H, Vassileva J. Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction: a conceptual and feasibility study. Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12;16:1527828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1527828. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40012711BACKGROUNDBarkley, RA. Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS) New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
BACKGROUNDBrown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
PMID: 12703651BACKGROUNDHeckman CJ, Dykstra JL, Collins BN. Substance-Related Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior among College Students: Opportunities for Health Education. Health Educ J. 2011 Dec;70(4):383-399. doi: 10.1177/0017896910379694.
PMID: 22303033BACKGROUNDHiller ML, Broome KM, Knight K, Simpson DD. Measuring self-efficacy among drug-involved probationers. Psychol Rep. 2000 Apr;86(2):529-38. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.529.
PMID: 10840908BACKGROUNDKhazaee-Pool M, Naghibi SA, Pashaei T, Chaleshgar-Kordasiabi M, Daneshnia M, Ponnet K. Drug Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale (DASES): psychometric properties of the Farsi version. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Jan 3;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00336-9.
PMID: 33388062BACKGROUNDKirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2012). Monetary Choice Questionnaire [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.1037/t10044-000
BACKGROUNDLins de Holanda Coelho G, H P Hanel P, Vilar R, P Monteiro R, Gouveia VV, R Maio G. Need for Affect and Attitudes Toward Drugs: The Mediating Role of Values. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53(13):2232-2239. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1467454. Epub 2018 May 4.
PMID: 29727251BACKGROUNDManser P, Poikonen H, de Bruin ED. Feasibility, usability, and acceptance of "Brain-IT"-A newly developed exergame-based training concept for the secondary prevention of mild neurocognitive disorder: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Sep 21;15:1163388. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1163388. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37810620BACKGROUNDMeredith LR, Maralit AM, Thomas SE, Rivers SL, Salazar CA, Anton RF, Tomko RL, Squeglia LM. Piloting of the Just Say Know prevention program: a psychoeducational approach to translating the neuroscience of addiction to youth. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1770777. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
PMID: 32687415BACKGROUNDSchalet BD, Pilkonis PA, Yu L, Dodds N, Johnston KL, Yount S, Riley W, Cella D. Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.036. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
PMID: 26931289BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jasmin Vassileva, Ph.D.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2025
First Posted
September 17, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
June 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share