Oral Melatonin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma
Melasma
Efficacy of Oral Melatonin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the efficacy of oral melatonin and oral tranexamic acid in treating melasma, with the aim of determining whether melatonin is more effective than tranexamic acid, as measured by MASI scores. Literature suggests melatonin may be more effective due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-melanogenic properties. The findings will assess whether melatonin provides better efficacy and tolerance compared to tranexamic acid in managing this persistent condition. Efficacy will be assessed by comparing the baseline MASI scores with the scores obtained at six-week and twelve-week follow-up points based on the following cut-offs: \<25% improvement Mild response 25-50% improvement Moderate Response 51-75% improvement Good response \>75% improvement Excellent Response
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2025
CompletedSeptember 11, 2025
September 1, 2025
6 months
July 31, 2025
September 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Total participants are 160, 80 in Group A and 80 in Group B
Group A will receive oral melatonin 5mg HS for 12 weeks and Group B will receive oral tranexamic acid 250 mg BD for 12 weeks and then the improvement will be assessed by calculating MASI score at day 1, 6weeks and 12 weeks.MASI score less than 10 is considered mild , 11-20 is considered moderate and more than 20 is considered Severe Melasma. An improvement greater than 25% in the MASI score will be considered as the threshold for treatment efficacy.
12 weeks
Efficacy of Oral Melatonin VS Oral Tranexamic Acid in the management of Melasma
As per literature Melatonin may be more effective due to its Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory and anti-melanogenic properties. The findings will assess whether Melatonin provides better efficacy and tolerance compared to Tranexamic Acid in managing Melasma.An improvement greater than 25% in the MASI score will be considered as the threshold for treatment efficacy.
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A - Oral melatonin
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A will receive oral melatonin 5mg daily at night for 3 months after ruling out any contraindications. Melasma Area and severity index will be calculated at day one , 6 weeks and 12 weeks.
Group B - Oral tranexamic acid
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B will receive oral tranexamic acid 250mg twice daily for 3 months after ruling out any contraindications.Melasma area and severity index will than be calculated on day one , 6 weeks and 12 weeks.
Interventions
Group A will receive oral melatonin 5mg every night for 3 months
Group B will receive oral tranexamic acid 250mg twice daily for 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18-50 years diagnosed with melasma.
- Both genders.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contraindications to melatonin, including pregnancy, breastfeeding, autoimmune disorders, bleeding disorders, and diabetes, or contraindications to tranexamic acid, including thromboembolic events, history of thrombosis, renal impairment, and pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the medications.
- Patients already taking treatment of melasma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hina Maliklead
Study Sites (1)
PAEC General Hospital Islamabad Pakistan
Islamabad, Punjab Province, 44000, Pakistan
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Post Graduate Trainee
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2025
First Posted
September 11, 2025
Study Start
June 28, 2025
Primary Completion
December 28, 2025
Study Completion
December 28, 2025
Last Updated
September 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- January 2026 to janurary 2027
- Access Criteria
- De-identified IPD will be shared with qualified researchers who submit a proposal for secondary analysis that aligns with the trial's objectives and methodology. Proposals must outline planned analyses, including statistical methods, and will be reviewed by an independent committee for scientific merit and feasibility. A data sharing agreement must be signed, ensuring participant confidentiality and data protection. Requests can be sent to dr.hina567@gmail.com. Access will be granted for analyses that advance knowledge in melasma management, such as exploring treatment efficacy, safety, or predictors of response.
The plan to share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) from this clinical trial, including the efficacy of oral melatonin versus oral tranexamic acid in managing melasma, with researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal for secondary analysis. The data shared will include the primary and secondary outcome measures, participant demographics, and other relevant study data. Data will be accessible 12 months after the primary publication of the trial results, via a secure online platform, with a data use agreement. Access will be granted to researchers who provide a detailed proposal and agree to the terms of data sharing, including maintaining participant confidentiality and not attempting to re-identify participants. Requests for data access should be directed to dr.hina567@gmail.com This IPD sharing plan aligns with the ICMJE's expectations for data sharing and transparency in clinical trials.