Comparison of Talc Slurry Versus Talc Insufflation: A Study on Effectiveness, Safety, and Hospital Outcomes in Pleurodesis
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pleural effusion is characterized by the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, which typically contains about 10-20 mL of pleural fluid that is crucial for the movement of the lungs against the chest wall. This fluid closely resembles plasma but has a lower protein concentration, usually less than 1.5 gm/dL. It primarily originates from pleural capillaries and the interstitial spaces of the lung, and is reabsorbed through the lymphatic vessels in the parietal pleura, either via small openings known as stomas or through a process called transcytosis (1, 2). When the balance between fluid production and reabsorption is disrupted-often due to various pathogenic mechanisms-it can lead to pleural effusion. In such cases, effective management is essential. This study aims to conduct a thorough comparison of the two talc administration methods-TS and TI-using sterilized, large-particle, asbestos-free talc powder. By examining key outcome measures such as pleurodesis success rates, procedural morbidity, and length of hospital stay, the goal is to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance to facilitate informed decision-making in the management of pleural effusions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2027
January 6, 2026
January 1, 2026
12 months
September 4, 2025
January 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success of Pleurodesis
The success rate of pleurodesis is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve complete resolution of pleural effusion or pneumothorax within a specified time frame of 01 months post-procedure. Success is assessed through follow-up chest radiographs, with criteria for success including the absence of fluid reaccumulation or lung collapse during this period. Clinical improvement in symptoms such as dyspnea may also be considered as supplementary evidence of a successful outcome.
01 months post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Procedural Morbidity of pleurodesis
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Talc Slurry Group
EXPERIMENTALpatient undergoing pleurodesis by talc slurry method are included in this group
Talc Insufflation Group
EXPERIMENTALpatient undergoing pleurodesis by talc insufflation method are included in this group
Interventions
Talc slurry pleurodesis is a chemical technique for managing recurrent pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. The procedure involves instilling a suspension of talc (4-5 grams) in sterile saline (50-100 mL) into the pleural space via a chest tube. This induces an inflammatory reaction, leading to fibrosis and fusion of pleural surfaces. The technique demonstrates 70-90% success rates in malignant pleural effusions and pneumothoraces, with efficacy comparable to talc poudrage. While generally safe, potential complications include pain, fever, and rarely, pneumonitis or empyema. Use of large-particle, asbestos-free talc and standardized protocols has improved its safety profile.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged 12 years and older.
- Diagnosed with malignant pleural effusions or pneumothoraces.
- ECOG performance status of 0-2.
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- No contraindications to general anesthesia or conscious sedation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 12 years old
- Female patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Patients with encysted or septated pleural effusions and pneumothoraces
- Patients presenting with respiratory failure
- Patients complaining of dyspnea in spite of complete evacuation of pleural effusion or pneumothorax.
- Patients with evident chest infection with clinical or laboratory signs suggestive of parapneumonic effusions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Services Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Services Hospital Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Muhammad Shoaib Nabi, Professor of Thoracic Surgery
Services institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Services Hospital Lahore
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2025
First Posted
September 11, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 30, 2027
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01