Neurofeedback Training for Autistic Children
Developing an EEG-fNIRS Neurofeedback Application for Brain Training for Autistic Children
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn if a new brain training method, called combined electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) neurofeedback, can improve thinking, emotions, and social functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It will also learn if this training is practical and safe to use with children in Hong Kong. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does combined EEG-fNIRS neurofeedback improve attention, emotion regulation, and social skills in children with ASD?
- Is this type of neurofeedback training feasible and well-tolerated by children? Researchers will compare the new combined EEG-fNIRS training with single EEG or fNIRS training to see if it provides additional benefits. Participants will: .Receive sessions of EEG-fNIRS neurofeedback training. .Complete assessments of thinking skills, emotional regulation, and social functioning before and after training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedSeptember 8, 2025
August 1, 2025
6 months
August 24, 2025
August 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Effectiveness of treatments for autistic individuals
The Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) assesses the effectiveness of treatments for autistic individuals. It is completed by parent and consists of four subscales in different aspects of functioning, including Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior. Parents are required to answer each question using a 3-point scale ranging from 0 (not true) to 2 (true). The checklist can typically be completed in about 5 minutes.
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Social behavior and Social impairments
The Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2) is a 65-item questionnaire designed to assess social behavior and identify social impairments associated with autism spectrum disorders. It is completed by parent and evaluates 5 subscales, including social awareness, social cognition, social communication, social motivation, and restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. Respondents rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not true) to 3 (always true), reflecting the frequency and severity of observed behaviors. The questionnaire can typically be completed in around 10 minutes.
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Executive function in children and adolescents
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) is a 63-item questionnaire designed to assess executive function in children and adolescents. It is completed by parent and evaluates subscales such as behavioral regulation, emotional control, and cognitive processes. Respondents rate each item on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often), indicating the frequency of behaviors. The questionnaire can typically be completed in around 15 minutes.
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Anxiety and depression symptoms in children and adolescents
The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale-Parent Version (RCADS-P) is a 25-item questionnaire designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in children and adolescents. Completed by parent, it evaluates key emotional domains, including generalized anxiety, panic disorder, separation anxiety, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder. Parents rate each item based on their child's recent behavior using a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (never), 1 (sometimes), 2 (often), and 3 (always), reflecting the frequency of symptoms. The checklist can typically be completed in around 3 minutes.
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Go/No-go(post; RT)
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Go/No-go (post; Accuracy)
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Sternberg Working Memory Task (post; RT)
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Sternberg Working Memory Task (post; Accuracy)
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
Task Switching (post; RT)
Within 1 week before the first training session, and within 1 week after the last training session
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Combined EEG-fNIRS group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants will undertake two essential phases of neurofeedback training: (1) baseline and (2) training. During baseline phase (typically 3 minutes), the user plays the default neurofeedback game to obtain baseline EEG and fNIRS recordings. On the basis of these signals, the mean and standard deviation of the index of interest will be extracted and calculated. During the training phase (typically 5 minutes), the signal processing is almost identical to the one during baseline phase, but the moment-to-moment outcome variable will be Z-normalized according to the mean and SD of the target index. Once the data is pushed to the LSL stream for use in neurofeedback game interaction, participants can see the corresponding changes in the game screen. For the combined EEG-fNIRS group, both the EEG and fNIRS indices will be be extracted. To encourage integration, the lower value of the two will be chosen as the outcome variable.
EEG group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants will undertake two essential phases of neurofeedback training: (1) baseline and (2) training. During baseline phase (typically 3 minutes), the user plays the default neurofeedback game to obtain baseline EEG and fNIRS recordings. On the basis of these signals, the mean and standard deviation of the index of interest will be extracted and calculated. During the training phase (typically 5 minutes), the signal processing is almost identical to the one during baseline phase, but the moment-to-moment outcome variable will be Z-normalized according to the mean and SD of the target index. Once the data is pushed to the LSL stream for use in neurofeedback game interaction, participants can see the corresponding changes in the game screen. For EEG, the frontal theta/beta ratio, left-right difference in frontal alpha power, and the mu power are chosen as the target training indices.
fNIRS group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants will undertake two essential phases of neurofeedback training: (1) baseline and (2) training. During baseline phase (typically 3 minutes), the user plays the default neurofeedback game to obtain baseline EEG and fNIRS recordings. On the basis of these signals, the mean and standard deviation of the index of interest will be extracted and calculated. During the training phase (typically 5 minutes), the signal processing is almost identical to the one during baseline phase, but the moment-to-moment outcome variable will be Z-normalized according to the mean and SD of the target index. Once the data is pushed to the LSL stream for use in neurofeedback game interaction, participants can see the corresponding changes in the game screen. For fNIRS, the level of prefrontal activation (HbO or HbR), the left-right difference in prefrontal activation, and the motor cortex activation are chosen as the target training indices, respectively.
Interventions
For EEG and fNIRS, EEG signals will be recorded using the ANT Neuro eego rt 8 amplifier device (ANT Neuro, Hengelo, The Netherlands), with electrodes placed at C3, C4, F3, F4, Fpz, M1, M2, and GND (ground). fNIRS signals will be recorded using the Artinis Brite Lite fNIRS device(Artinis Medical Systems, The Netherlands). The overall channel configuration consists of eight sources and four detectors. Among these, four sources (T2a-d) and four detectors (R1-4) form four short-separation channels, while the remaining four sources and four detectors constitute six long-separation channels (T1-R1, T3-R1, T3-R2, T4-R3, T5-R3, T5-R4). The overall configuration is approximately arranged in two L-shaped layouts surrounding the F3 and F4 regions.
EEG signals will be recorded using the ANT Neuro eego rt 8 amplifier device (ANT Neuro, Hengelo, The Netherlands), with electrodes placed at C3, C4, F3, F4, Fpz, M1, M2, and GND (ground).
fNIRS signals will be recorded using the Artinis Brite Lite fNIRS device(Artinis Medical Systems, The Netherlands). The overall channel configuration consists of eight sources and four detectors. Among these, four sources (T2a-d) and four detectors (R1-4) form four short-separation channels, while the remaining four sources and four detectors constitute six long-separation channels (T1-R1, T3-R1, T3-R2, T4-R3, T5-R3, T5-R4). The overall configuration is approximately arranged in two L-shaped layouts surrounding the F3 and F4 regions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 8 to 12 years
- Previous diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or Asperger's syndrome
- No intellectual impairment or studying in mainstream schools
- Right-handedness
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Education University of Hong Konglead
- HOME Psychological Services Ltd.collaborator
- ANT Asia Pacificcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Education And Human Development OF The Educational University Of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
Related Publications (33)
Wang SY, Lin IM, Fan SY, Tsai YC, Yen CF, Yeh YC, Huang MF, Lee Y, Chiu NM, Hung CF, Wang PW, Liu TL, Lin HC. The effects of alpha asymmetry and high-beta down-training neurofeedback for patients with the major depressive disorder and anxiety symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
PMID: 31302517BACKGROUNDVan Doren J, Arns M, Heinrich H, Vollebregt MA, Strehl U, K Loo S. Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;28(3):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
PMID: 29445867BACKGROUNDTrambaiolli LR, Kohl SH, Linden DEJ, Mehler DMA. Neurofeedback training in major depressive disorder: A systematic review of clinical efficacy, study quality and reporting practices. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jun;125:33-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
PMID: 33587957BACKGROUNDThe Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2019). EDB to enhance support for students with autism spectrum disorders. Retrieved August 24, 2022, from https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201910/03/P2019100300291.htm?fontSize=1.
BACKGROUNDSteingrimsson S, Bilonic G, Ekelund AC, Larson T, Stadig I, Svensson M, Vukovic IS, Wartenberg C, Wrede O, Bernhardsson S. Electroencephalography-based neurofeedback as treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 31;63(1):e7. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.7.
PMID: 32093790BACKGROUNDShaffer RC, Pedapati EV, Shic F, Gaietto K, Bowers K, Wink LK, Erickson CA. Brief Report: Diminished Gaze Preference for Dynamic Social Interaction Scenes in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Feb;47(2):506-513. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2975-2.
PMID: 27878742BACKGROUNDRusso, G. M., Balkin, R. S., & Lenz, A. S. (2022). A meta-analysis of neurofeedback for treating anxiety-spectrum disorders. Journal of Counseling & Development, 100(3), 236-251.
BACKGROUNDRosson S, de Filippis R, Croatto G, Collantoni E, Pallottino S, Guinart D, Brunoni AR, Dell'Osso B, Pigato G, Hyde J, Brandt V, Cortese S, Fiedorowicz JG, Petrides G, Correll CU, Solmi M. Brain stimulation and other biological non-pharmacological interventions in mental disorders: An umbrella review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Aug;139:104743. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104743. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
PMID: 35714757BACKGROUNDPineda JA, Carrasco K, Datko M, Pillen S, Schalles M. Neurofeedback training produces normalization in behavioural and electrophysiological measures of high-functioning autism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 28;369(1644):20130183. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0183. Print 2014.
PMID: 24778378BACKGROUNDPineda, J. A., Brang, D., Hecht, E., Edwards, L., Carey, S., Bacon, M., ... & Rork, A. (2008). Positive behavioral and electrophysiological changes following neurofeedback training in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(3), 557-581.
BACKGROUNDPerihan C, Burke M, Bowman-Perrott L, Bicer A, Gallup J, Thompson J, Sallese M. Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Reducing Anxiety in Children with High Functioning ASD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):1958-1972. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03949-7.
PMID: 30810842BACKGROUNDMehler DMA, Sokunbi MO, Habes I, Barawi K, Subramanian L, Range M, Evans J, Hood K, Luhrs M, Keedwell P, Goebel R, Linden DEJ. Targeting the affective brain-a randomized controlled trial of real-time fMRI neurofeedback in patients with depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Dec;43(13):2578-2585. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0126-5. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
PMID: 29967368BACKGROUNDMarzbani H, Marateb HR, Mansourian M. Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016 Apr;7(2):143-58. doi: 10.15412/J.BCN.03070208.
PMID: 27303609BACKGROUNDMarx AM, Ehlis AC, Furdea A, Holtmann M, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, Rothenberger A, Gevensleben H, Freitag CM, Fuchsenberger Y, Fallgatter AJ, Strehl U. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) neurofeedback as a treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 7;8:1038. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01038. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25610390BACKGROUNDLlorente AM, Voigt RG, Williams J, Frailey JK, Satz P, D'Elia LF. Children's Color Trails Test 1 & 2: test-retest reliability and factorial validity. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;23(4):645-60. doi: 10.1080/13854040802427795. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
PMID: 18942031BACKGROUNDLiu, Z., Shore, J., Wang, M., Yuan, F., Buss, A., & Zhao, X. (2021). A systematic review on hybrid EEG/fNIRS in brain-computer interface. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 68, 102595.
BACKGROUNDLi K, Jiang Y, Gong Y, Zhao W, Zhao Z, Liu X, Kendrick KM, Zhu C, Becker B. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy-informed neurofeedback: regional-specific modulation of lateral orbitofrontal activation and cognitive flexibility. Neurophotonics. 2019 Apr;6(2):025011. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.6.2.025011. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
PMID: 31930153BACKGROUNDKouijzer, M. E., de Moor, J. M., Gerrits, B. J., Congedo, M., & van Schie, H. T. (2009). Neurofeedback improves executive functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(1), 145-162.
BACKGROUNDKothe C, Shirazi SY, Stenner T, Medine D, Boulay C, Grivich MI, Artoni F, Mullen T, Delorme A, Makeig S. The Lab Streaming Layer for Synchronized Multimodal Recording. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jul 14:2024.02.13.580071. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.13.580071.
PMID: 38405712BACKGROUNDKober SE, Spork R, Bauernfeind G, Wood G. Age-related differences in the within-session trainability of hemodynamic parameters: a near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback study. Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Sep;81:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
PMID: 31280116BACKGROUNDKirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, Scoboria A, Moore TJ, Johnson BT. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
PMID: 18303940BACKGROUNDKimmig AS, Dresler T, Hudak J, Haeussinger FB, Wildgruber D, Fallgatter AJ, Ehlis AC, Kreifelts B. Feasibility of NIRS-based neurofeedback training in social anxiety disorder: behavioral and neural correlates. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019 Sep;126(9):1175-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-1954-5. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
PMID: 30498952BACKGROUNDKellems, R. O., Charlton, C. T., Black, B., Bussey, H., Ferguson, R., Gonçalves, B. F., ... & Vallejo, S. (2022). Social Engagement of Elementary-Aged Children With Autism Live Animation Avatar Versus Human Interaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 01626434221094792.
BACKGROUNDHammond DC. Neurofeedback with anxiety and affective disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):105-23, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.008.
PMID: 15564054BACKGROUNDGuven A, Altinkaynak M, Dolu N, Demirci E, Ozmen S, Izzetoglu M, Pektas F. Effects of Methylphenidate on Reaction Time in Children with Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019 Mar;56(1):27-31. doi: 10.29399/npa.22873. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
PMID: 30911234BACKGROUNDFriedrich EV, Sivanathan A, Lim T, Suttie N, Louchart S, Pillen S, Pineda JA. An Effective Neurofeedback Intervention to Improve Social Interactions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Dec;45(12):4084-100. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2523-5.
PMID: 26210513BACKGROUNDFernandez-Alvarez J, Grassi M, Colombo D, Botella C, Cipresso P, Perna G, Riva G. Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):201-216. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004396. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
PMID: 34776024BACKGROUNDEhlis, A. C., Barth, B., Hudak, J., Storchak, H., Weber, L., Kimmig, A. C. S., ... & Fallgatter, A. J. (2018). Near-infrared spectroscopy as a new tool for neurofeedback training: Applications in psychiatry and methodological considerations. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(4), 225-241.
BACKGROUNDDemetriou EA, Lampit A, Quintana DS, Naismith SL, Song YJC, Pye JE, Hickie I, Guastella AJ. Autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of executive function. Mol Psychiatry. 2018 May;23(5):1198-1204. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.75. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
PMID: 28439105BACKGROUNDDanial JT, Wood JJ. Cognitive behavioral therapy for children with autism: review and considerations for future research. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(9):702-15. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31829f676c.
PMID: 23917373BACKGROUNDChorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000 Aug;38(8):835-55. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00130-8.
PMID: 10937431BACKGROUNDArns M, de Ridder S, Strehl U, Breteler M, Coenen A. Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009 Jul;40(3):180-9. doi: 10.1177/155005940904000311.
PMID: 19715181BACKGROUNDAmerican Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Edition, Text Revision). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kin Chung Michael Yeung, PhD
Education University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- During each training session, a cap adjusted to the participant's head size will be used to mount the EEG and fNIRS sensors. The hardware setup will be the same for all groups to ensure that both the participant and experimenter are blinded to the training group. Besides, all participants will be identified by numbers, which are randomly assigned to one of three conditions by the Principal Investigator, who does not involve in either the assessment or training session.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2025
First Posted
September 2, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data related to this study will be kept strictly confidential and will be accessible only to the research team for research purposes. Study findings may be published in academic journals or presented at conferences; however, the names of participants and their families will remain confidential. All assessment instruments will be identified by coded numbers rather than names, and all personal information will be stored in a locked filing cabinet until the fifth year following the dissemination of study results. The Confidentiality and Privacy Ordinance of The Educational University Of Hong Kong shall protect and keep all medical data.