Comparing Classical Approach and Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Classical Popliteal Sciatic Block Versus Crosswise Approach for Popliteal Sciatic (CAPS) Block in Below Knee Surgery:A Randomised Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sensory and motor innervation below the knee is provided mainly by the popliteal-sciatic nerve except for a variable area of the medial leg supplied by the saphenous nerve. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia for below knee surgery are frequently provided by blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Popliteal sciatic block was first introduced around the 1970s and has emerged as a popular technique for below knee surgery despite other types of lower limb peripheral nerve block. This is contributed because popliteal fossa offers a superficial and accessible location for nerve blockade. This anatomical feature simplifies the procedure and may reduce the risk of complications such as vascular puncture or nerve injury. Analgesia provided by the popliteal sciatic block lasts significantly longer than with ankle blocks. One of the reasons is administration of local anaesthetic agent at the popliteal fossa allows it to bathe the sciatic nerve before it bifurcates into the tibial and common peroneal nerves, leading to a more extensive and prolonged nerve blockade. Besides the sciatic nerve at the popliteal level is encased in a common epineural sheath, which can facilitate the spread of the anaesthetic and prolong its effect. The popliteal sciatic block can be performed as a single-shot technique or as a continuous infusion via a catheter The success rate of popliteal sciatic block is dependent on several variables, including the operator's skill, patient considerations, and surgical variables. This study comparing between 2 approaches of popliteal sciatic nerve ie: classical approach and relatively new approach that is crosswise approach of popliteal sciatic nerve (CAPS) block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2025
CompletedAugust 21, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.1 years
March 21, 2025
August 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score during positioning and block performance
Using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS),ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable.
Time from positioning and block performance until completion of block (preoperative).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Fentanyl consumption
On operative day until post operative day 1
Onset of block
Immediately after block completion until 30 minutes after.
Failure rate
30 minutes after block completion
Patient's satisfaction
One day after procedure.
Complications
On operative day until post operative day 1
Study Arms (2)
Classical Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients turned to the right or left lateral decubitus position, depending on which lower limb was planned for operation (i.e., right lateral decubitus if the operation was on the left lower limb and vice-versa). A pillow was placed between the lower limbs to facilitate block access and patient comfort. The classical popliteal sciatic block was done using a ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. Skin infiltration with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% was performed using a 23G,followed by in-plane introduction of an 80 mm 22G block needle, aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation, with placement confirmed using a nerve stimulator. After confirming negative aspiration for blood, 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% was injected, and the spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound.
Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve (CAPS block)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in remained in the supine position. The CAPS block was performed using a similar Sonosite SII® ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed lateral to the thigh, 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease, while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into the tibial and common peroneal nerves. Thereafter, the block proceeded similarly to patients in Group A, with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% for skin infiltration, in-plane introduction of the block needle aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation and placement confirmed with a nerve stimulator, followed by injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% after confirming negative aspiration for blood. The spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound.
Interventions
Different position while blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- planned for either elective or non-elective unilateral below-knee surgery at HUKM
- patients aged 18 years and older and classified as physical status I, II, or III as dictated by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)
You may not qualify if:
- included pregnant patients, those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m², contraindicated to peripheral nerve block (such as existing nerve injury to the limb intended for surgery), patient refusal, severe coagulopathy, local anaesthetic (LA) allergy, active infection at the intended block site, patients unable to provide a pain score using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2025
First Posted
August 21, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
November 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05