Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block
Effects of Adding Adductor Canal Block to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in Hallux Valgus Correction Operations
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to determine the effect of adding adductor canal block to popliteal sciatic nerve block on patient-surgeon satisfaction, intraoperative sedation need, tourniquet pain, return time of motor block, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing hallux valgus correction surgery. The main question it aims to answer are:
- Does peroperative pain decrease?
- Do patient-surgeon satisfaction increase? The patients were divided into two groups, the Popliteal Sciatic Block (PSB) group, and the Popliteal Sciatic Block + Adductor Canal Block (PSB + ACB) group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2023
CompletedAugust 1, 2023
July 1, 2023
4 months
July 17, 2023
July 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Between 1-10. The low values mean low pain and a better outcome.
Postoperative 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are in the group undergoing popliteal sciatic block
Adductor Canal Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are in the group undergoing popliteal sciatic block + adductor canal block
Interventions
Patients undergoing popliteal sciatic block, the side where the procedure would be performed in the prone position was sterilized after appropriate antisepsis. After visualizing the popliteal artery in the popliteal fossa with the probe it was advanced proximally in a horizontal and minimally lateral position to determine the point of separation of the tibial and peroneal nerves from the sciatic nerve. Subcutaneous local anesthesia was applied at this point after the skin, and the stimulator needle was advanced towards the sciatic nerve in an in-plane approach, passing through the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and then the nerve stimulator was opened up to 1 mA. After observing motor movement in the foot, the stimulator was reduced to 0.3-0.5 mA, and after observing motor movements for duration of 0.1 ms, 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 10 ml of 2% prilocaine were administered to the target tissue
Patients in the group undergoing popliteal sciatic block + adductor canal block, with the extremity to be blocked slightly externally rotated, the anterior part of the thigh was prepared with the necessary antiseptic procedures while the patient was in the supine position. Using an ultrasound probe, the femoral artery was visualized by advancing the ultrasound probe distally, and the saphenous nerve was identified just lateral to the femoral artery, beneath the sartorius muscle. At the junction of the sartorius muscle and vastus medialis, 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 10 ml of 2% prilocaine were applied to the periphery of the saphenous nerve. Subsequently, the patient was turned prone, and a popliteal sciatic block was performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 80
- American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with coagulopathy
- Patient with wounds or infections in the region
- Patient with allergies to local anesthetic drugs
- Patient with significantly impaired peripheral neuropathy and neurogenic disorders affecting the lower extremity
- Patient with peripheral arterial disease
- Patient with mental retardation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Istanbul, Kadikoy, 34720, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ezgi Polat
İstanbul Medeniyet University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2023
First Posted
July 25, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 10, 2022
Study Completion
February 10, 2022
Last Updated
August 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share