Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With a Combined Femoral, Sciatic, Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Secondary Total Hip Arthroplasty; (REVPET)
REVPET
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effect of a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with a combined femoral, sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients scheduled for secondary total hip arthroplasty. The primary objective of this study is to compare postoperative pain management between the PENG block and the combined block (femoral, sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous) by measuring postoperative morphine consumption in each of the two groups. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Patients assigned to the PENG group will receive a PENG block with ropivacaine, followed by a sham (sciatic) block, and spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine. Patients assigned to the combined block group will receive femoral, sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks with ropivacaine, followed by spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
September 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.9 years
July 7, 2025
September 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative postoperative morphine consumption at day 1
Description: total consumption in mg
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Morphine consumption in the recovery room
from admission till discharge from the recovery room, up to 2 hours
PCA administered morphine consumption at day 2
at day 2 postoperatively
Rest and dynamic pain scores
At 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
at 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively
Incidence of pruritus
at 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PENG group
EXPERIMENTALPericapsular nerve group block
Combined nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORCombined femoral, sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block
Interventions
Participants in the PENG group will first receive a sham sciatic injection; the needle will be inserted into the subcutaneous tissue and 3 ml of 0.9% NaCl will be injected. They will then receive a PENG nerve block in the supine position. A low-frequency (2-5 MHz) curvilinear ultrasound probe (BK Ultrasound) will be used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the pubic eminence, and the psoas tendon with its fascial plane. A 22-gauge, 50 mm needle (SonoPlex® Pajunk) will be inserted into the fascial plane to inject 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi).
Participants in the combined group will first receive a sciatic nerve block performed with the patient in a semi-prone position, the lower limb flexed at 90° (hip and knee), elevated with a cushion placed between the legs. A straight line will be drawn between the greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity. The sciatic nerve is located approximately at the midpoint of this line. Under ultrasound guidance, the ischial tuberosity will be identified medially, the greater trochanter laterally, the gluteus maximus muscle superficially beneath the adipose tissue, and the quadratus femoris muscle in depth. A 22-gauge, 50 mm needle will then be inserted into the fascial plane to inject 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. The patient is then placed supine for femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks. 15 ml of local anaesthetics will be injected around the femoral nerve and 5 around the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients
- ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I-III
- years of age or older
- Patients scheduled for elective secundary hip arthroplasty
- Able to give written conformed consent autonomously
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal or inability to give consent
- Allergy to any of: ropivacaine, paracetamol, ibuprofen, ketorolac, morphine, ondansetron or dexamethasone
- Bleeding diathesis
- Neurological deficit of the operative side
- Existing preoperative opioid use
- Renal insufficiency (GFR\<30ml/min according to the Cockroft-Gault formula)
- Hepatic insufficiency
- Morbid Obésity III
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
She C, Liu H. The efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for reducing pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 8;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04707-x.
PMID: 38584259BACKGROUNDNewman JT, Briggs KK, McNamara SC, Philippon MJ. Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Adolescent Patients Compared With a Matched Cohort Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3063-3069. doi: 10.1177/0363546516659656. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PMID: 27514736BACKGROUNDBohl DD, Samuel AM, Basques BA, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR, Grauer JN. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar;31(3):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.033. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PMID: 26507527BACKGROUNDMahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):27-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005.
PMID: 12533568BACKGROUNDKurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PMID: 17403800BACKGROUNDSchwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S79-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
PMID: 32151524BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Med. Eric Albrecht, Associate Professor, University of Lausanne
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2025
First Posted
August 7, 2025
Study Start
September 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share