Supplementary Nerve Blocks Added to the Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Sciatic, BiFeS, and IPACK Techniques
Comparison of the Effectiveness of "Sciatic Nerve", "Biceps Femoris Short Head (BiFeS)" and "Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee (IPACK)" Blocks Added to the Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant clinical problem that delays early mobilization, reduces patient satisfaction, and increases analgesic requirements. The adductor canal block (ACB), which aims to provide analgesia while preserving motor function, is widely used in postoperative pain management after TKA. However, clinical and anatomical studies have demonstrated that ACB is effective only in the anteromedial sensory innervation of the knee and does not adequately block pain originating from the posterior knee capsule. This limitation reduces analgesic effectiveness, particularly in patients with a prominent posterior pain component. The sciatic nerve block has long been considered the gold standard for managing posterior knee pain. However, due to disadvantages such as motor weakness and delayed rehabilitation, current pain management protocols increasingly favor motor-sparing and complementary approaches such as the Biceps Femoris Short Head (BiFeS) block and the Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee (IPACK) block for posterior knee analgesia. In light of this information, the aim of our study is to guide clinical practice by comparing the postoperative analgesic efficacy, motor function outcomes, and patient satisfaction associated with sciatic nerve, BiFeS, and IPACK block techniques-each administered as a supplement to the adductor canal block-in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, with the ultimate goal of determining the optimal block combination for postoperative pain control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
January 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 year
November 17, 2025
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm horizontal line with endpoints representing the extremes of pain (0 = "no pain," 10 = "worst imaginable pain"). Patients will mark their perceived pain level, and the distance (in cm or mm) from the "no pain" anchor will be recorded as the VAS score. Measurements will be performed at rest. A VAS score below 3 indicates mild pain and adequate analgesia.
Postoperative 24 hours (measured at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Modified Bromage Scale
24 hours
QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) Questionnaire
24 hours
Postoperative Opioid Requirement
24 hours
Time to First Opioid Requirement
24 hours
Peroneal nerve motor function
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
Adductor Canal Block + Sciatic Nerve Block
EXPERIMENTALProcedure: Mid-Adductor Canal Block Procedure: Sciatic Nerve Block
Adductor Canal Block + BiFeS Block
EXPERIMENTALProcedure: Mid-Adductor Canal Block Procedure: BiFeS Block
Adductor Canal Block + IPACK Block
EXPERIMENTALProcedure: Mid-Adductor Canal Block Procedure: IPACK Block
Interventions
IPACK Block An ultrasound-guided IPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) block using 20 mL of local anesthetic solution (10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10 mL 0.9% saline) to provide posterior knee capsular analgesia while sparing motor function.
Sciatic Nerve Block An ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block performed at the proximal thigh level using 20 mL of local anesthetic solution (10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10 mL 0.9% saline) to provide posterior knee analgesia.
Adductor Canal Block An ultrasound-guided injection of 20 mL local anesthetic solution (10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10 mL 0.9% saline) administered in the mid-portion of the adductor canal to provide motor-sparing analgesia to the anteromedial knee.
BiFeS Block (Biceps Femoris Short Head Block) An ultrasound-guided injection targeting the short head of the biceps femoris muscle to selectively block sensory branches contributing to posterior knee pain. A total of 20 mL of local anesthetic (10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10 mL 0.9% saline) is administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
- Patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Patients between 18 and 75 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV or higher
- Patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty
- Patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Patients with neuromuscular disease
- Patients who decline to participate in the study
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction
- Patients with known drug allergies
- Patients with a history of local anesthetic systemic toxicity
- Patients with neurological dysfunction
- Patients with bleeding diathesis
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi
Erzincan, Merkez, 24000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 21, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share