NCT07106658

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) improves procedural success and patient tolerance in cirrhotic patients undergoing urgent unsedated endoscopy for suspected variceal bleeding. Participants with cirrhosis and suspected acute variceal bleeding requiring urgent endoscopy are randomly assigned to one of three groups:

  1. 1.Active TEAS: Electrical stimulation at bilateral Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Gongsun (SP4) starting 30 minutes before endoscopy and continuing until 15 minutes after the procedure.
  2. 2.Sham TEAS: Identical electrode placement but no electrical current.
  3. 3.Control: Standard endoscopy alone without electrodes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 18, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 3, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 12, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

July 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Variceal BleedingTranscutaneous Electrical Acupoint StimulationCirrhoticProcedural Tolerance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Procedural Success

    A binary composite endpoint requiring both: 1. Technical adequacy: Complete visualization score of 4/4 for esophagus, stomach, duodenum to D2, and gastric fundus via retroflexion. 2. Patient satisfaction: Score ≤2 on a 5-point Likert scale (1=very acceptable to 5=very unacceptable).

    Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  • Patient Discomfort

    Mean score of five visual analogue scales (VAS, 0-10) assessing nausea/vomiting, throat discomfort, bucking, abdominal distension/pain, and agitation at 30 minutes post-procedure.

    At 30 minutes post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Procedural Efficiency - Diagnostic

    Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  • Procedural Efficiency - Therapeutic

    Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  • Immediate Hemostasis Success

    Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  • 7-Day Rebleeding Rate

    Within 7 days post-procedure

  • Heart Rate

    At pre-endoscopy (baseline), during endoscopy, and 30 minutes post-procedure

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Real TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive active TEAS at bilateral Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Gongsun (SP4) using a Hwato SDZ-III stimulator (dense-disperse wave, 2/20 Hz, intensity set to maximum tolerance). Stimulation begins 30 minutes before endoscopy and continues until 15 minutes after the procedure. All patients receive topical pharyngeal anesthesia and standard medical management.

Other: TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

Sham TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants receive sham TEAS with identical electrode placement at the same four acupoints using the same device, but no electrical current is delivered. The device appears active to maintain blinding. All patients receive topical pharyngeal anesthesia and standard medical management.

Other: Sham TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

Urgent Endoscopy Only

OTHER

Participants receive standard urgent endoscopy care only, with no TEAS electrodes or device applied. They receive identical topical pharyngeal anesthesia and standard medical management as the other groups.

Other: Urgent Endoscopy Only

Interventions

Device: Hwato SDZ-III Electronic Acupuncture Treatment Instrument Stimulation at LI4, PC6, ST36, SP4; 2/20 Hz dense-disperse wave; intensity to maximum tolerance; 30 min pre-procedure to 15 min post-procedure.

Real TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

Device: Hwato SDZ-III Electronic Acupuncture Treatment Instrument (no current) Identical electrode placement; no electrical stimulation; same duration as active group.

Sham TEAS + Urgent Endoscopy

Standard urgent endoscopy with topical pharyngeal anesthesia; no TEAS intervention.

Urgent Endoscopy Only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18-80 years with suspected or confirmed esophagogastric variceal bleeding
  • Confirmed cirrhosis (any etiology/Child-Pugh class)
  • Scheduled for urgent endoscopy as soon as possible following hemodynamic stabilization
  • Ability to provide written informed consent (directly or through legally authorized representative)

You may not qualify if:

  • Hepatic encephalopathy ≥ Grade II
  • Cognitive impairment or severe anxiety disorders preventing valid assessment
  • Hemodynamic instability post-resuscitation (systolic BP \<90 mmHg)
  • Skin lesions at acupoint sites
  • Presence of electrical implants (e.g., pacemakers)
  • Allergies to TEAS electrodes or emergency medications
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • History of long-term opioid use (\>3 months)
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Prior TEAS or acupuncture experience (to maintain blinding integrity)
  • Participation in another interventional trial within 30 days
  • \. Dropout Criteria:
  • Severe adverse events requiring immediate termination (anaphylaxis, hemodynamic collapse, oxygen desaturation \<85%)
  • Life-threatening complications during endoscopy (esophageal perforation, cardiac arrest)
  • Inability to complete full esophagogastroduodenoscopy due to patient intolerance or technical failure
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100039, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL, Farquhar C. Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 26;2013(7):CD006920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006920.pub3.

    PMID: 23888428BACKGROUND
  • Lee H, Ernst E. Acupuncture for GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Nov;60(5):784-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02030-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15557955BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageFibrosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Zheng Lu, Doctor

    Beijing 302 Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2025

First Posted

August 6, 2025

Study Start

July 18, 2025

Primary Completion

February 3, 2026

Study Completion

February 12, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

1. Ongoing Research Commitments Further analyses and secondary studies using the same dataset are planned, including subgroup investigations and long-term outcome assessments. Premature data sharing could compromise the integrity of these planned works. 2. Participant Privacy and Confidentiality The dataset contains sensitive clinical information (e.g., cirrhosis etiology, hemorrhage severity, neuropsychiatric status). Complete anonymization is challenging, and re-identification risks violate ethical/legal safeguards.

Locations