LINX vs Fundoplication
GOLF
Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial for Treatment of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease; LINX Management System vs. Fundoplication (GOLF)
3 other identifiers
interventional
460
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Reflux disease can severely impact upon quality-of-life and lead to complications, including ulceration of the oesophagus. It is often controlled with self-help measures and medication. However, sometimes surgery is recommended. The current standard surgical treatment is called a fundoplication. This operation is carried out through keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery, and tightens the lower oesophagus to prevent reflux. Fundoplication is very safe and improves the quality-of-life of most patients. However, many patients have gas bloating, difficulty swallowing and recurrence of their reflux symptoms. As an alternative, some surgeons use a device called LINX, using a keyhole procedure. LINX is a magnetic device that wraps around the lower oesophagus to prevent reflux. Studies suggest that LINX may cause fewer complications, with a similar improvement in quality-of-life. However, there is a need for better evidence to compare LINX with fundoplication in the surgical treatment of reflux disease. GOLF is a multi-centre study designed which to determine if LINX achieves similar reflux control and improves symptoms compared to fundoplication. GOLF measures: (1) quality of life,(2) surgical complications, including need for additional treatment, (3) financial cost-effectiveness and (4) objectively measure the presence of acid that has refluxed into the lower oesophagus. GOLF aims randomise 460 patients to receive fundoplication or the LINX device. It will be conducted across at least 16 UK and 7 European specialist surgical centres. All participants will be followed up at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months to assess which treatment offers the best results after surgery. A quality assurance programme within participating centres will ensure that procedures are completed to a high-quality standard. Study results will incorporate a patient and public involvement programme, which will inform national and international guidelines for the surgical treatment of reflux disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2029
August 5, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.9 years
July 2, 2025
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Symptomatic GORD and health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessed using the GORD-HRQL questionnaire
24 months following surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Prevalence of gas bloating measured using participant-reported outcomes/GORD-HRQL and Foregut Symptom Questionnaire
24 months postoperatively
Prevalence of inability to belch measured using participant-reported outcomes/GORD-HRQL and Foregut Symptom Questionnaire
24 months postoperatively
Prevalence of symptomatic GORD, inability to belch and gas bloating measured using participant-reported outcomes/GORD-HRQL and Foregut Symptom Questionnaire
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Severity of dysphagia and regurgitation measured using participant-reported outcomes/GORD-HRQL questionnaire
6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
Global HRQL measured using participant-reported outcomes/EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication will receive surgical treatment for managing GORD including a total or partial fundic wrap behind or in front of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.
Laparoscopic or robotic LINX procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX procedure) will receive surgical treatment under general anaesthesia, with placement of the LINX device around the distal oesophagus. The LINX device comprises titanium beads with magnets in the centre.
Interventions
Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX procedure) will receive surgical treatment under general anaesthesia, with placement of the LINX device around the distal oesophagus. The LINX device comprises titanium beads with magnets in the centre.
Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication will receive surgical treatment for managing GORD including a total or partial fundic wrap behind or in front of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and above
- Willing and able to give informed consent
- Patients with GORD insufficiently controlled by medical therapy or intolerance to medical therapy being considered for anti-reflux surgery
- Symptomatic and objectively defined GORD; endoscopy with appearances or biopsies consistent with reflux oesophagitis, or 24-hour pH study or BRAVO test of the oesophagus consistent with GORD
- No hiatal hernia or hiatal hernia \<5 cm in length
- Adequate lower oesophageal motility as defined by preoperative oesophageal manometry study. Oesophageal manometry will show a mean contractile amplitude of \>30 mmHg or DCI \>450 mmHg-s-cm in 70% of swallows.
You may not qualify if:
- Unsuitable for surgical intervention due to medical conditions precluding general anaesthesia
- Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel, or ferrous materials
- Previous anti-reflux or gastric surgery
- Previous or planned neurosurgical intervention
- Oesophageal manometry showing complete absence of lower oesophageal contractility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oxfordlead
- King's College Londoncollaborator
- Imperial College Londoncollaborator
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University of Bristolcollaborator
- University of Southamptoncollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2025
First Posted
July 30, 2025
Study Start
March 6, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2029
Last Updated
August 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data-sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.