Physical Activity and Gastrointestinal Investigations
An Observational Study to Compare the Outcomes of Ambulatory Gastrointestinal Investigations With Physical Activity Using Accelerometry.
1 other identifier
observational
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observational study, which aims to compare the outcomes of ambulatory gastrointestinal investigations with physical activity using accelerometry. An ambulatory study refers to one in which the patient is monitored freely, often outside of the hospital environment. For this the investigators will use a lightweight (7.4g) tri-axial accelerometer worn behind the ear. Hypothesis 1 There is no change in the amount or nature of physical activity taken by patients during ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring or capsule endoscopy. Hypothesis 2 There is no correlation between physical activity levels and speed of gastrointestinal transit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 13, 2019
CompletedSeptember 13, 2019
August 1, 2019
1.3 years
January 6, 2012
September 11, 2015
August 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical Activity Change (%)
The primary outcome measure is amount of physical activity undertaken by participants throughout the study period. Participant motion data will be collected using a tri-axial accelerometer in the eAR sensor. Signal processing methods will be used to produce an activity index in the form of a numerical value, from the raw data. Activity levels were grouped at 1- minute intervals into restful, low, moderate or high intensity activity. Activity levels were calibrated for each participant, classifying activity into quartiles, where the most inactivity was labelled 'Restful', 2nd quartile 'low intensity', 3rd quartile 'moderate intensity' and upper quartile 'high intensity'. This provided a personalised activity profile with which to compare activity during the investigation.
Difference between baseline (2 days average) and test day (during pH monitoring)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Relative Intensity of Daily Activities (%)
Difference between baseline (2 days average) and test day (during pH monitoring)
Study Arms (2)
Capsule endoscopy
24 hour oesophageal pH study
Eligibility Criteria
Those who have been advised to undergo 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring, or capsule endoscopy (from GI outpatients clinic)
You may qualify if:
- Planned 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring study, or capsule endoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Undergone previous capsule endoscopy or ambulatory oesophageal pH test
- Currently a hospital in-patient
- Severe mobility disorder (unable to walk or mobilise independently)
- Age less than 18 or above 65
- Physically unable to wear eAR sensor (eg. bilateral hearing aids or particularly small ears)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Kwasnicki RM, Ley Greaves R, Ali R, Gummett PA, Yang GZ, Darzi A, Hoare J. Implementation of objective activity monitoring to supplement the interpretation of ambulatory esophageal PH investigations. Dis Esophagus. 2016 Apr;29(3):255-61. doi: 10.1111/dote.12312. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
PMID: 25625191RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Richard Mark Kwasnicki
- Organization
- Imperial College London
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard M Kwasnicki, BSc Hons
Imperial College London
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2012
First Posted
January 10, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 13, 2019
Results First Posted
September 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share