Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Structured Foot-Ankle Sensorimotor Training in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Persistent lower-extremity motor and somatosensory impairments after stroke commonly limit walking and balance despite rehabilitation. Virtual reality (VR)-integrated robotic rehabilitation may support structured, goal-directed ankle-foot practice; however, there is limited evidence for ankle-foot-focused sensorimotor protocols. In particular, approaches that combine robot-assisted motor training with a plantar tactile localization task and VR-supported joint position sense (JPS) training to target plantar sensory and proprioceptive function are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, VR-integrated, robot-assisted ankle-foot sensorimotor rehabilitation protocol in individuals with chronic stroke and to examine its effects on clinical and sensorimotor outcomes. Methods and analysis: This is an assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Thirty individuals with chronic stroke will be randomized 1:1 to the Robot-assisted Training Group (RTG) or the Manual Training Group (MTG). All participants will receive conventional rehabilitation; in addition, RTG will receive a structured robot-assisted ankle-foot training program integrated with virtual reality and assist-as-needed control, whereas MTG will receive the same structured ankle-foot training protocol delivered manually by a physiotherapist. Interventions will be delivered three times per week for 6 weeks (18 sessions), and total session duration will be time-matched between groups (50-60 min per session). The primary outcome will be the change in walking speed, derived from the 10-Meter Walk Test, from baseline to 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include 2-Minute Walk Test distance, ankle range of motion, joint position sense, plantar tactile sensation, muscle tone, motor performance, static and dynamic balance, and stroke-specific quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2027
May 28, 2026
May 1, 2026
12 months
July 9, 2025
May 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Walking Speed (10-Meter Walk Test)
Walking speed will be assessed using the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). The test will be performed on a 14-m flat, unobstructed walkway including 2-m acceleration and 2-m deceleration distances. Time (s) will be recorded between 2 and 12 m using a stopwatch (dynamic start method), and walking speed (m/s) will be calculated as 10 m divided by the recorded time. Participants may use their customary walking aids. The test will be performed three times, and the mean walking speed will be used for analysis.
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Static Balance Assessment (The Single-Leg Stance Test)
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
Assessment of Joint Position Sense
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
Assessment of Satisfaction Level Related to the Robot (Quest Scale-Lıkert Scale-4's)
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
Quality of Life Assessment (The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale)
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
Tactile Perception Level (The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test)
From baseline to the end of the 6-week intervention
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Robot-assisted training group (RTG)
EXPERIMENTALRobot-assisted ankle-foot sensorimotor training will consist of plantar vibrotactile sensory training, passive ROM training, VR-based joint position sense training, active ROM training using an assist-as-needed paradigm, and a final sensory training phase. Training will be delivered three times per week for six weeks, with progression individualized according to participant performance, ROM capacity, and safety limits. Difficulty will be increased by modifying sensory task complexity, repetitions, target positions, movement speed, and robotic assistance parameters.
Manual Training Group (MTG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the manual training group will receive a structured ankle-foot sensorimotor training program delivered by a physiotherapist. The intervention will include plantar sensory training, passive ROM training, joint position sense training, active ROM training, and a final sensory training phase. Training will be provided three times per week for six weeks, with progression individualized according to participant performance, ROM capacity, and safety limits. Progression will be achieved by modifying sensory task difficulty, repetitions, target positions, movement speed, and exercise volume throughout the intervention period.
Interventions
Stage 1: Vibration Training Applied for Proper Stepping on the Sole of the Foot and Proper Pressure Distribution: The first step of the training will be constant vibration, and the second step will be sensory localization training with vibration. Stage 2: Passive Joint Range of Motion Training with Virtual Reality: The platform will move the ankle passively (passive stretching). Stage 3: Joint Position Sense Training: The platform will bring the patient's ankle to a certain dorsiflexion position, the patient will be asked to feel and be aware of this angle, then the patient will be asked to return to the neutral position and perform ankle dorsiflexion at the angle that the platform initially brought. Stage 4: Active Joint Range of Motion Training with Virtual Reality: Along with active dorsiflexion, when necessary, assistance will be provided with the Assistance as Needed (AAN) control paradigm, a feature of the robotic device. Stage 5: It is the same as Stage 1
Stage 1: Sensory Training to the Sole of the Foot: In the first step of the training, the physiotherapist will manually apply constant pressure with a blunt object, and in the second step, sensory localization training with a blunt object will be performed. Stage 2: Passive Joint Range of Motion Training: The ankle will be manually moved passively (passive stretching) by the physiotherapist. Stage 3: Joint Position Sense Training: The physiotherapist will bring the patient's ankle to a certain dorsiflexion position, the patient will be asked to feel and be aware of this angle, then the patient will be asked to return to the neutral position and perform ankle dorsiflexion at the angle that the physiotherapist initially brought. Stage 4: Active Joint Range of Motion Training: This stage will be performed with manual assistance provided by the physiotherapist when necessary, along with active dorsiflexion. Stage 5: It is the same as Stage 1
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 40-65 years,
- Able to understand and follow study instructions,
- Able to communicate coherently and oriented in time and place,
- Provided written informed consent,
- Stroke ≥6 months prior to enrollment (chronic stroke),
- Ankle plantarflexor spasticity ≤2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale,
- Ankle dorsiflexor strength ≥ grade 2 on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale,
- Passive ankle dorsiflexion to neutral (90°; 0°) without a plantarflexion contracture,
- Moderate or mild lower-extremity impairment based on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score (21-27 moderate; 28-34 mild/good),
- Able to sit for at least 1 hour,
- Able to walk at least 10 meters with or without an assistive device,
- Completed all conventional lower-extremity physical therapy and rehabilitation programs.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Test score ≤ 24),
- Conditions affecting walking or balance (e.g., orthopedic complications, lower extremity amputation, osteoporosis),
- Insufficient visual acuity to view a screen (e.g., diplopia),
- Severe visual deficits (e.g., hemianopia) or vestibular disorders34,
- Sensory deficits such as hemisensory neglect,
- Acute musculoskeletal or cardiovascular disorders,
- Intrathecal baclofen pump use or botulinum toxin injections within the past 5 months,
- Fixed or painful contracture of the paretic ankle,
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, debilitating or immunosuppressive diseases),
- history of a non-stroke neurological disease/disorder that may impair comprehension of instructions,
- Concurrent participation in other lower-extremity physical therapy, robotic rehabilitation, or neurological exercise programs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
İstanbul Medipol Ăœniversitesi-Acıbadem Medipol Region Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34815, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)
İstanbul Medipol Ăœniversitesi
Istanbul, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)
Related Publications (40)
Kwong PWH, Ng SSM, Chung RCK, Ng GYF. A structural equation model of the relationship between muscle strength, balance performance, walking endurance and community integration in stroke survivors. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0185807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185807. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29049293BACKGROUNDKim KH, Jang SH. Effects of Cognitive Sensory Motor Training on Lower Extremity Muscle Strength and Balance in Post Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 14;11(3):640-649. doi: 10.3390/clinpract11030079.
PMID: 34563008BACKGROUNDKim H, Cho S, Lee H. Effects of passive Bi-axial ankle stretching while walking on uneven terrains in older adults with chronic stroke. J Biomech. 2019 May 24;89:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PMID: 31060809BACKGROUNDKhalifeloo M, Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Akbari M, Jalaie S, Jannat D, Hasson S. A study on the immediate effects of plantar vibration on balance dysfunction in patients with stroke. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Apr 26;14(2):259-266. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836044.022. eCollection 2018 Apr.
PMID: 29740561BACKGROUNDKavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP. The plantar sole is a 'dynamometric map' for human balance control. Neuroreport. 1998 Oct 5;9(14):3247-52. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199810050-00021.
PMID: 9831459BACKGROUNDde la Iglesia DH, Mendes AS, Gonzalez GV, Jimenez-Bravo DM, de Paz Santana JF. Connected Elbow Exoskeleton System for Rehabilitation Training Based on Virtual Reality and Context-Aware. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 6;20(3):858. doi: 10.3390/s20030858.
PMID: 32041156BACKGROUNDHussain I, Jany R. Interpreting Stroke-Impaired Electromyography Patterns through Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;24(5):1392. doi: 10.3390/s24051392.
PMID: 38474928BACKGROUNDHoh JE, Semrau JA. The Role of Sensory Impairments on Recovery and Rehabilitation After Stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s11910-025-01407-9.
PMID: 40047982BACKGROUNDHesse S, Tomelleri C, Bardeleben A, Werner C, Waldner A. Robot-assisted practice of gait and stair climbing in nonambulatory stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):613-22. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.08.0142.
PMID: 22773263BACKGROUNDGBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
PMID: 34487721BACKGROUNDForrester LW, Roy A, Krywonis A, Kehs G, Krebs HI, Macko RF. Modular ankle robotics training in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):678-87. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521004. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
PMID: 24515923BACKGROUNDFoley N, Murie-Fernandez M, Speechley M, Salter K, Sequeira K, Teasell R. Does the treatment of spastic equinovarus deformity following stroke with botulinum toxin increase gait velocity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Dec;17(12):1419-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03084.x.
PMID: 20491885BACKGROUNDFerry B, Compagnat M, Yonneau J, Bensoussan L, Moucheboeuf G, Muller F, Laborde B, Jossart A, David R, Magne J, Marais L, Daviet JC. Awakening the control of the ankle dorsiflexors in the post-stroke hemiplegic subject to improve walking activity and social participation: the WAKE (Walking Ankle isoKinetic Exercise) randomised, controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Aug 16;23(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06545-w.
PMID: 35974379BACKGROUNDFeigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, Fisher M, Pandian J, Lindsay P. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jan;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
PMID: 34986727BACKGROUNDDe Santis D, Zenzeri J, Casadio M, Masia L, Riva A, Morasso P, Squeri V. Robot-assisted training of the kinesthetic sense: enhancing proprioception after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 5;8:1037. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01037. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25601833BACKGROUNDCovaciu F, Pisla A, Iordan AE. Development of a Virtual Reality Simulator for an Intelligent Robotic System Used in Ankle Rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;21(4):1537. doi: 10.3390/s21041537.
PMID: 33672161BACKGROUNDCordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317437. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
PMID: 18645190BACKGROUNDCioni M, Esquenazi A, Hirai B. Effects of botulinum toxin-A on gait velocity, step length, and base of support of patients with dynamic equinovarus foot. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;85(7):600-6. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000223216.50068.bc.
PMID: 16788391BACKGROUNDCho JE, Lee WH, Shin JH, Kim H. Effects of bi-axial ankle strengthening on muscle co-contraction during gait in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled pilot study. Gait Posture. 2021 Jun;87:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
PMID: 33945964BACKGROUNDChen X, Liu F, Yan Z, Cheng S, Liu X, Li H, Li Z. Therapeutic effects of sensory input training on motor function rehabilitation after stroke. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013387.
PMID: 30508935BACKGROUNDCelletti C, Suppa A, Bianchini E, Lakin S, Toscano M, La Torre G, Di Piero V, Camerota F. Promoting post-stroke recovery through focal or whole body vibration: criticisms and prospects from a narrative review. Neurol Sci. 2020 Jan;41(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04047-3. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
PMID: 31468237BACKGROUNDCaldas R, Mundt M, Potthast W, Buarque de Lima Neto F, Markert B. A systematic review of gait analysis methods based on inertial sensors and adaptive algorithms. Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
PMID: 28666178BACKGROUNDBouisset S, Do MC. Posture, dynamic stability, and voluntary movement. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):345-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
PMID: 19026956BACKGROUNDMahmoudzadeh A, Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Motamedzadeh O, Shaw BS, Shariat A, Shaw I. Effect of Ankle Plantar Flexor Spasticity Level on Balance in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Aug 21;9(8):e16045. doi: 10.2196/16045.
PMID: 32663137BACKGROUNDBohannon, R. W. 2001. ''Measurement of joint range of motion in the rehabilitation of patients with stroke'', Stroke Rehabilitation, 22(4), 417-421.
BACKGROUNDPodsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PMID: 1991946BACKGROUNDPerez-Cruzado D, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study. Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Aug 30;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-127.
PMID: 25174611BACKGROUNDHarb A, Margetis K, Kishner S. Modified Ashworth Scale. 2025 Apr 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554572/
PMID: 32119459BACKGROUNDConforto AB, Ferreiro KN, Tomasi C, dos Santos RL, Moreira VL, Marie SK, Baltieri SC, Scaff M, Cohen LG. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(3):263-72. doi: 10.1177/1545968309349946. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
PMID: 19884642BACKGROUNDAsin-Prieto G, Mercante S, Rojas R, Navas M, Gomez D, Toledo M, Martinez-Exposito A, Moreno JC. Post-stroke rehabilitation of the ankle joint with a low cost monoarticular ankle robotic exoskeleton: Preliminary results. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 25;10:1015201. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1015201. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36507258BACKGROUNDArene N, Hidler J. Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):346-56. doi: 10.1310/tsr1605-346.
PMID: 19903653BACKGROUNDAn, S.H., Park, D-S., Limb, Ji-Y. 2017. ''Discriminative validity of the timed up and go test for community ambulation in persons with chronic stroke'', Phys Ther Rehabil Sci., 6 (4), 176-181
BACKGROUNDKarimi-AhmadAbadi A, Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Fakhari Z, Khalifeloo M. A clinical single blind study to investigate the immediate effects of plantar vibration on balance in patients after stroke. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):242-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 5.
PMID: 29861214BACKGROUNDBonassi G, Biggio M, Bisio A, Ruggeri P, Bove M, Avanzino L. Provision of somatosensory inputs during motor imagery enhances learning-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 24;7(1):9300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09597-0.
PMID: 28839226RESULTBensoussan L, Mesure S, Viton JM, Delarque A. Kinematic and kinetic asymmetries in hemiplegic patients' gait initiation patterns. J Rehabil Med. 2006 Sep;38(5):287-94. doi: 10.1080/16501970600694859.
PMID: 16931458RESULTHakverdioglu Yont G, Khorshid L. Turkish version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Jun;59(2):274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
PMID: 22591101RESULTWilliams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1362-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.7.1362.
PMID: 10390308RESULTFugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
PMID: 1135616RESULTHosoi Y, Kamimoto T, Sakai K, Yamada M, Kawakami M. Estimation of minimal detectable change in the 10-meter walking test for patients with stroke: a study stratified by gait speed. Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1219505. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219505. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37538254RESULThttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.04.013
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study will be single-blind. Outcome assessments will be performed by an experienced physiotherapist blinded to group allocation. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants and treating physiotherapists cannot be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2025
First Posted
July 29, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2027
Last Updated
May 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share