Investigation of the Efficacy of Internal and External Perturbation Exercises on Functional Parameters in Stroke Rehabilitation
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is a serious medical condition that causes the death of brain cells as a result of blockage of a blood vessel that feeds the brain (ischemic stroke) or bleeding in or around the brain (hemorrhagic stroke). People who have had a stroke have a higher risk of falling than people who have not had a stroke at the same age. Lack of balance control not only increases the risk of falling, but also leads to fear of falling and reduces the integration of people with stroke into society. The central nervous system uses two main postural strategies to maintain and restore balance when perturbed. These; are anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments. Anticipatory postural adjustments control the position of the body's center of mass by activating the trunk and leg muscles prior to a forthcoming body perturbation, thus minimizing the risk of loosing equilibrium. Compensatory postural adjustment are initiated by sensory feedback signals and serve as a mechanism of restoration of the position of the center of mass after a perturbation has already occurred. In this study, the investigators aimed to determine which one is more effective, unlike previous studies that showed that internal and external perturbation exercises were effective when applied together. For this purpose, the researchers the planned to investigate and compare the effects on balance, performance, activity and participation in individuals to whom only internal perturbations were applied and only external perturbations were applied. The participants will be divided into 2 groups, as Group A and Group B, with 10 participants in each group, in a randomized controlled manner. Treatment Protocol: Conventional treatment was applied to participants included in both groups for 4 weeks, 5 days a week, 40-minute sessions. In addition to conventional treatment, 30 minutes of perturbation-based balance training was given to the participant in the study. Participants in Group A received internal perturbation training, and participants in Group B received external perturbation training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2022
CompletedJuly 15, 2022
July 1, 2022
4 months
March 8, 2022
July 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline in dynamic and static balance on the Berg Balance Scale at 4 weeks
Berg balance scale is a valid and reliable test that measures both dynamic and static balance. It evaluates the body's ability to maintain position during 14 different activities in which the support surface decreases and the center of gravity changes, by observation. It is scored between 0-4 points, while at 0 the activity cannot be completed, at 4 it is completed independently. The total score is 56. If the score obtained at the end of the test is between 0-20, it is interpreted as poor balance skills, between 21-40 as acceptable balance and between 41-56 as advanced balance skills.
baseline and 4 weeks
Change from baseline in balance on the Timed Up and Go Test at 4 weeks
For the timed up and go test, the patient gets up from the chair without arm support, walks 3 meters, returns and sits back in the chair. The total time it takes to complete the test is recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. The evaluation results are valid as they include maneuvers used in daily life. Individuals with independent balance and mobility skills complete the test in less than 10 seconds, individuals who complete it in more than 30 seconds are dependent on many activities and mobility skills in daily life.
baseline and 4 weeks
Change from baseline in balance 10-meter Walking Test at 4 weeks
In this test, the person is asked to walk at his own normal pace in a pre-measured 10-meter area. The time starts when the person's foot is on the starting line and ends when they cross the finish line. Two measurements are made and the best value is recorded in meters/second.
baseline and 4 weeks
Change from baseline in balance on the One Leg Standing Test at 4 weeks
One foot is lifted so that it does not touch the other leg and the time is measured with a stopwatch. At first the eyes are open. When the eye open test is completed, the test is done with the eyes closed and it is expected that he can maintain his balance for 30 seconds. An imbalance is considered if the lifted leg touches the other leg, the foot touches the floor, bounces or bounces, or anything in the environment is touched for support.
baseline and 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change from baseline in daily life activities on the Nottingham Health Profile at 4 weeks
baseline and 4 weeks
Change from baseline in ambulation ability on the Functional Ambulation Classification (FAS) at 4 weeks
baseline and 4 weeks
Motor development in stroke patients on the Brunnstrom Hemiplegia Recovery Staging at baseline
baseline
Assessment method for spasticity on the Modified Ashworth Scale at baseline
baseline
Change from baseline in level of disability on the Barthel Index at 4 weeks
baseline and 4 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Internal perturbation
EXPERIMENTALThe people included in this group did 6 internal perturbation exercises with 10 repetitions in each session. The patients performed a total of 60 perturbation exercises in one session. Perturbations were chosen according to the patient's tolerance, from easy to difficult. Treatment protocols of stroke individuals were determined according to their functional levels. 6 of the exercises given below were chosen according to the levels determined at the beginning of the study and were progressed by getting more difficult.
Eksternal perturbation
EXPERIMENTALThe individuals included in this group performed 6 external perturbation exercises with 10 repetitions in each session. The patients performed a total of 60 perturbation exercises in one session. Perturbations were chosen according to the patient's tolerance, from easy to difficult. Treatment protocols of stroke individuals were determined according to their functional levels. 6 of the exercises given below were chosen according to the levels determined at the beginning of the study and were progressed by getting more difficult.
Interventions
* Raising and lowering arms 90 degrees forward and sideways with eyes open and closed. * In tandem stance with eyes open and closed, arms are raised and lowered 90 degrees forward and to the side. * While standing on one leg with eyes open and closed, arms are raised and lowered 90 degrees forward and to the side. * Step forward and backward with right and left foot alternately * Take a step back and step back alternately with right and left foot * Put the right foot on the step and take it back, then do the same with the left foot and ask the patient to do it quickly. * First step on the step with the right foot and put the left foot next to it, then step down with the right foot and take the left foot with it, repeat the same with the left foot and ask the patient to do this. rapidly. * Normal gait, sideways gait, tandem gait, backward gait, raising and lowering the arms forward and sideways 90 degrees, respectively, during back-to-back tandem gait.
* Front, side, and rear loading and release, pushing and pulling while standing with eyes open and closed * Front, side and rear loading and release, pushing and pulling while standing in tandem with eyes open and closed * Loading and releasing from the front, sides and back, pushing and pulling while turning the head left and right while standing * Front, side and rear loading and release, pushing and pulling while standing up and down with eyes open and closed * Front, side, and rear loading and release, pushing and pulling while standing on one leg with eyes open and closed * Holding the ball thrown by physiotherapist * Kicking a ball thrown by physiotherapist * Holding the ball thrown by the physiotherapist while standing in tandem, walking, walking sideways, walking in tandem, walking backwards.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral stroke history
- Adults with chronic stroke (\>6 months poststroke)
- Ability to stand for at least 30 seconds without support
You may not qualify if:
- Those with Parkinson's disease, amputation, severe osteoporosis
- Those with uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension
- In addition to stroke, the presence of any problem that may adversely affect balance
- Areas below 24 in the mini mental state test
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medipol University Sefakoy Hospital
Istanbul, 34515, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2022
First Posted
April 7, 2022
Study Start
April 20, 2022
Primary Completion
August 20, 2022
Study Completion
November 20, 2022
Last Updated
July 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07