NCT07083167

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the communication between the anesthesiologist and the patient prior the initiation and during the administration of the labor neuraxial analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that there will be differences among anesthesiologists during the informed consent process and communication during the procedure, specifically, how the anesthesiologists describe the technical aspects of the procedure, alternatives, risks, complications, and expected effects of labour neuraxial analgesia. The anesthesiologists will be observed during a routine labor neuraxial analgesia procedure for healthy uncomplicated patients.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 2, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 13, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 13, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Informed consent

    Incidence of key elements (such as technique desciption, alternatives, risks, complications, and expected effects) during the consent process before the labour neuraxial analgesia procedure. This will be assessed using a structured observation checklist with dichotomous variables (yes/no).

    From the first contact with the patient before labour neuraxial analgesia until the procedure is finished.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Procedure description

    During the standard clinical consent process provided to patients prior to the administration of labour neuraxial anesthesia.

  • Additional labour analgesia options

    During the standard clinical consent process provided to patients prior to the administration of labour neuraxial analgesia.

  • Risks and complications

    During the standard clinical consent process provided to patients prior to the administration of labour neuraxial analgesia.

  • Anticipated effects

    During the standard clinical consent process provided to patients prior to the administration of labour neuraxial analgesia.

  • Patient information sheets

    During the standard clinical consent process provided to patients prior to the administration of labour neuraxial analgesia.

Study Arms (1)

Anesthesiologists

All anesthesiologists providing labor neuraxial analgesia

Other: No Interventions.

Interventions

No interventions.

Anesthesiologists

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All obstetric anesthesiologists working in maternity unit

You may qualify if:

  • all obstetric anesthesiologists working in maternity unit

You may not qualify if:

  • any comorbidity of the patient that would necessitate deviation from a routine practice for the initiation of labor neuraxial analgesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesia at BC Women's Hospital, University of British Columbia.

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Yentis SM, Hartle AJ, Barker IR, Barker P, Bogod DG, Clutton-Brock TH, Ruck Keene A, Leifer S, Naughton A, Plunkett E. AAGBI: Consent for anaesthesia 2017: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/anae.13762.

    PMID: 27988961BACKGROUND
  • Tait AR, Teig MK, Voepel-Lewis T. Informed consent for anesthesia: a review of practice and strategies for optimizing the consent process. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):832-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0188-8. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

    PMID: 24898765BACKGROUND
  • Pattee C, Ballantyne M, Milne B. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues. Can J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;44(9):918-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03011961.

    PMID: 9305553BACKGROUND
  • Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.

    PMID: 29781504BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Vit B Gunka, MD

    Department of Anesthesia at BC Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Vit B Gunka, MD

CONTACT

Juliana Barrera, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Site Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2025

First Posted

July 24, 2025

Study Start

April 2, 2025

Primary Completion

September 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations