NCT07081529

Brief Summary

This clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the long-term clinical performance of direct and indirect restorations in Class I cavities of molar teeth over a 10-year period. A total of 54 restorations (27 direct and 27 indirect) were placed in 27 patients, with each patient receiving one direct and one indirect restoration. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 1-, 2-, and 10-year follow-ups using modified USPHS criteria.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
9.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2025

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 23, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 10-Year Clinical Success Rate of Direct and Indirect Restorations

    The primary outcome is the clinical success rate of direct and indirect Class I restorations in molar teeth after 10 years. Success and failure were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. A restoration was considered a failure if it required replacement due to secondary caries or other clinical complications.

    10 years

Study Arms (1)

Direct and Indirect Restorations

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm received two different types of restorations in Class I cavities of molar teeth: one direct restoration using a microhybrid universal composite, and one indirect restoration using a reinforced microfill composite system. Each patient received one of each restoration type on different molar teeth. Clinical evaluations were conducted at baseline, 1 year, 2 years, and 10 years using modified USPHS criteria.

Device: Direct Restoration with Microhybrid CompositeDevice: Indirect Restoration with Reinforced Microfill Composite

Interventions

Direct Class I restorations were placed in molar teeth using a microhybrid universal composite (Aelite All-Purpose Body, Bisco) and an adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Direct and Indirect Restorations

Indirect Class I restorations were fabricated using a reinforced microfill composite system (Tescera Indirect Composite System Body, Bisco) in the laboratory and cemented into molar teeth using resin cement.

Direct and Indirect Restorations

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting with two Class I cavities
  • Good oral hygiene maintenance
  • Absence of pulp or periodontal disease
  • Requirement for restoration of permanent molars due to occlusal caries

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism or clenching)
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Lack of interest in or refusal to comply with oral hygiene instructions
  • Pulp exposure during caries removal
  • Percussion sensitivity indicating possible pulpal or periapical pathology
  • Spontaneous discomfort associated with periodontal disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Tekce N, Demirci M, Tuncer S, Oghan Turkoglu M, Turgut V, Balci SN, Yersel G. Clinical evaluation of direct and indirect restorations in class I cavities: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 25;25(1):1430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06775-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Neslihan Tekçe

    Kocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2025

First Posted

July 23, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2024

Last Updated

July 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share