Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Class II Posterior Composite Restorations
1 other identifier
interventional
37
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of direct resin composite restorations placed with different placement techniques (incremental or bulk) and with different flowable linings (conventional or bulk-fill flowable) used in open-sandwich technique, in endodontically treated Class II cavities (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal), in a randomized controlled comparison.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedAugust 8, 2016
August 1, 2016
3.6 years
July 26, 2016
August 3, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical performance evaluation of different composite resin restorations with USPHS criteria
Every year in three years period
three years
Study Arms (2)
Aelite Flo
ACTIVE COMPARATORMicrohybrid flowable composite
x-tra base
ACTIVE COMPARATORBulk-fill flowable composite
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Permanent premolars and molars without any restorations were included in the study. Every tooth included in the study had neighboring teeth and were in occlusion to antagonistic teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded who needed indirect restorations due to significant loss of tooth structure, known allergies to product ingredients, had poor oral hygiene and a history of bruxism.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2016
First Posted
August 8, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share