Comparing CAD/CAM vs Composite for Carious Hypomineralized Molars Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Both Treatments.
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Partial Coverage CAD/CAM Restoration Versus Nanohybrid Composite of Carious Hypomineralized Permanent Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is enamel hypomineralization defined as qualitative defects caused by disruptions in either the calcification or maturation phases of amelogenesis affecting one or more first permanent molars (FPMs) and permanent incisors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.1 years
May 28, 2024
June 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Aesthetic Clinical success
According to FDI World Dental Federation criteria Five subcategories. From best to worst, the subcategories were: (1) clinically excellent, (2) clinically good, (3) clinically sufficient, (4) clinically not sufficient but repairable, and (5) clinically unacceptable. Assessment with category (5) was rated as a clinical failure.
12 months (baseline ''1 day '', 6 and 12 months)
Functional Clinical success
According to FDI World Dental Federation criteria Five subcategories. From best to worst, the subcategories were: (1) clinically excellent, (2) clinically good, (3) clinically sufficient, (4) clinically not sufficient but repairable, and (5) clinically unacceptable. Assessment with category (5) was rated as a clinical failure.
12 months (baseline ''1 day '', 6 and 12 months)
Biological clinical success
According to FDI World Dental Federation criteria Five subcategories. From best to worst, the subcategories were: (1) clinically excellent, (2) clinically good, (3) clinically sufficient, (4) clinically not sufficient but repairable, and (5) clinically unacceptable. Assessment with category (5) was rated as a clinical failure.
12 months (baseline ''1 day '', 6 and 12 months)
Study Arms (2)
Direct nanohybrid flowable composite
ACTIVE COMPARATORis a bioactive flowable nano-hybrid restorative with a newly developed patented nanofiller. It is indicated for all classes including occlusal and cusp. It has all of the Giomer Technology attributes, anti-bacterial, acid neutralization, and fluoride release and recharge, with improved handling and effortless polishing, and maintains a long-lasting shine. Beautifil Flow Plus X has the strength, durability, and aesthetics of a hybrid composite
IPS e.max CAD
EXPERIMENTALglass-ceramic-based restorations still offer the best translucency and esthetic qualities. The novel generation of lithium disilicate-based materials as IPS e.max CAD provides standard thickness and quick fabrication. Moreover, the adhesive technique used with this restoration type significantly raises its mechanical properties
Interventions
(Shofu)is a bioactive flowable nano-hybrid restorative with a newly developed patented nanofiller. It is indicated for all classes including occlusal and cusp. It has all of the Giomer Technology attributes, anti-bacterial, acid neutralization, and fluoride release and recharge, with improved handling and effortless polishing, and maintains a long-lasting shine. Beautifil Flow Plus X has the strength, durability, and aesthetics of a hybrid composite.
glass-ceramic-based restorations still offer the best translucency and esthetic qualities. The novel generation of lithium disilicate-based materials as IPS e.max CAD provides standard thickness and quick fabrication. Moreover, the adhesive technique used with this restoration type significantly raises its mechanical properties.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Cooperative children with large carious First Permanent Molars (FPM) lesions associated with weak cusps and defected hypo-mineralized enamel.
- Controlled dental disease - no active caries or periodontal diseases
- Patients will be available to be clinically reviewed up to 1 year
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with Symptoms of pulpitis.
- Patients with uncontrolled active tooth decay or periodontal disease (i.e. 4+ mm probing depth and bleeding on probing).
- Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, biting on hard objects).
- Patients with debilitating illnesses or complicating medical conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MSA University
El-Sheikh Zayed City, Giza Governorate, 16672, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahmoud M. Attia, Ph.D
Lecturer of Fixed Prosthodontics MSA University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2024
First Posted
July 3, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share