Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With (MIH) Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcome of using direct esthetic composite restorations in managing MIH cases and the use of preformed metal crowns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2023
CompletedFebruary 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
2.2 years
November 3, 2020
February 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hypersensitivity
Questioning the patient and/or the parent (Clemenus et al,2017) Binary (yes, no)
12 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Acceptability of the treatment
12 month
Study Arms (2)
Direct composite restorations
ACTIVE COMPARATORbulk-fill composite (Filtek BulkFlow, 3M Espe) will be used after infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar, following by carious tissue removal. Marginal bevelling of enamel will be performed. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M Espe) will be placed after selective enamel etching A bulk-fill composite will be used and covered using a nanohybrid composite, (Filtek XT, 3M Espe).
Performed metal crowns
ACTIVE COMPARATORPMCs (3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany) will be placed after infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar, followed by removal of carious dentin and enamel, Tooth preparation for fitting the crown, The correct size of crown will be chosen, and then Cemented with glass ionomer luting cement (KetacCem, 3M Espe).
Interventions
bulk-fill composite (Filtek BulkFlow, 3M Espe) will be used aftar infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar,following by carious tissue removal. Marginal bevelling of enamel will be performed. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M Espe) will be placed after selective enamel etching A bulk-fill composite will be used and covered using a nanohybrid composite, (Filtek XT, 3M Espe).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with MIH in one fully erupted molar or more.
- Age ranging from 7-12 years.
- cooperative children
- Good general health.
You may not qualify if:
- patients participating in other experiments.
- Patients with parents planning to move away within the following year.
- Patients with only mildly affected MIH molars that do not require extensive restorative treatment.
- MIH-affected molars that have a very poor prognosis and require extraction.
- First permanent molars that are affected with other developmental defects, such as hypoplasia, dental fluorosis or amelogenesis imperfecta.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
• • Alanzi A, Faridoun A, Kavvadia K, Ghanim A. 2018. Dentists' perception, knowledge, and clinical management of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in kuwait: A cross-sectional study. BMC oral health. 18(1):34. • Bakkal M, Abbasoglu Z, Kargul B. 2017. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on molar-incisor hypomineralisation: A pilot study. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 15(2):163-167. • Baroni C, Marchionni S. 2011. Mih supplementation strategies: Prospective clinical and laboratory trial. Journal of dental research. 90(3):371-376. • Bekes K, Heinzelmann K, Lettner S, Schaller HG. 2016. Efficacy of desensitizing products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate for hypersensitivity relief in mih-affected molars: An 8-week clinical study. Clinical oral investigations. • Bekes K, Steffen R. 2016. Das würzburger mih - konzept: Teil 1. Der mih - treatment need index (mih - tni). Ein neuer index zur befunderhebung und therapieplanung bei patienten mit molaren - inzisiven hypomineralisation Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde. 38(4):165-170. • Briggs A, Sculpher M. 1997. Commentary: Markov models of medical prognosis. BMJ. 314 (7077):345-345.Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. 2002. Thinking outside the box: Recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annual Review of Public Health. 23(1):377-401. • Byford, S., Knapp, M., Greenshields, J., Byford, S., Knapp, M., Greenshields, J., et al (2003) Cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy Cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate self- versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate selfharm: a rational decision making approach. harm: a rational decision making approach. Psychological Psychological MedicineMedicine, 33, 977 • Cuzick J. 2005. Rank regression. Encyclopedia of biostatistics vol 6. Wiley and Sons. de Souza JF, Fragelli CB, Jeremias F, Paschoal MAB, Santos-Pinto L, de Cassia Loiola Cordeiro R. 2017. • Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization. Clinical oral investigations. 21(5):1725-1733. • Dworkin SL. 2012. Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of sexual behavior. 41(6):1319-1320. • Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. 2016. Consort 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Bmj. 355:i5239
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding to the child participants and legal guardian of each participating child, operator, outcome assessor and statistician.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2020
First Posted
December 4, 2020
Study Start
July 4, 2021
Primary Completion
September 3, 2023
Study Completion
November 5, 2023
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share