NCT04654858

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcome of using direct esthetic composite restorations in managing MIH cases and the use of preformed metal crowns.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 4, 2021

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 3, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 5, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

MIH

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hypersensitivity

    Questioning the patient and/or the parent (Clemenus et al,2017) Binary (yes, no)

    12 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Acceptability of the treatment

    12 month

Study Arms (2)

Direct composite restorations

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

bulk-fill composite (Filtek BulkFlow, 3M Espe) will be used after infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar, following by carious tissue removal. Marginal bevelling of enamel will be performed. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M Espe) will be placed after selective enamel etching A bulk-fill composite will be used and covered using a nanohybrid composite, (Filtek XT, 3M Espe).

Procedure: Direct composite restorations

Performed metal crowns

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PMCs (3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany) will be placed after infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar, followed by removal of carious dentin and enamel, Tooth preparation for fitting the crown, The correct size of crown will be chosen, and then Cemented with glass ionomer luting cement (KetacCem, 3M Espe).

Procedure: Direct composite restorations

Interventions

bulk-fill composite (Filtek BulkFlow, 3M Espe) will be used aftar infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar,following by carious tissue removal. Marginal bevelling of enamel will be performed. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M Espe) will be placed after selective enamel etching A bulk-fill composite will be used and covered using a nanohybrid composite, (Filtek XT, 3M Espe).

Also known as: composite resin
Direct composite restorationsPerformed metal crowns

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children with MIH in one fully erupted molar or more.
  • Age ranging from 7-12 years.
  • cooperative children
  • Good general health.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients participating in other experiments.
  • Patients with parents planning to move away within the following year.
  • Patients with only mildly affected MIH molars that do not require extensive restorative treatment.
  • MIH-affected molars that have a very poor prognosis and require extraction.
  • First permanent molars that are affected with other developmental defects, such as hypoplasia, dental fluorosis or amelogenesis imperfecta.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • • • Alanzi A, Faridoun A, Kavvadia K, Ghanim A. 2018. Dentists' perception, knowledge, and clinical management of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in kuwait: A cross-sectional study. BMC oral health. 18(1):34. • Bakkal M, Abbasoglu Z, Kargul B. 2017. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on molar-incisor hypomineralisation: A pilot study. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 15(2):163-167. • Baroni C, Marchionni S. 2011. Mih supplementation strategies: Prospective clinical and laboratory trial. Journal of dental research. 90(3):371-376. • Bekes K, Heinzelmann K, Lettner S, Schaller HG. 2016. Efficacy of desensitizing products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate for hypersensitivity relief in mih-affected molars: An 8-week clinical study. Clinical oral investigations. • Bekes K, Steffen R. 2016. Das würzburger mih - konzept: Teil 1. Der mih - treatment need index (mih - tni). Ein neuer index zur befunderhebung und therapieplanung bei patienten mit molaren - inzisiven hypomineralisation Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde. 38(4):165-170. • Briggs A, Sculpher M. 1997. Commentary: Markov models of medical prognosis. BMJ. 314 (7077):345-345.Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. 2002. Thinking outside the box: Recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annual Review of Public Health. 23(1):377-401. • Byford, S., Knapp, M., Greenshields, J., Byford, S., Knapp, M., Greenshields, J., et al (2003) Cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy Cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate self- versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate selfharm: a rational decision making approach. harm: a rational decision making approach. Psychological Psychological MedicineMedicine, 33, 977 • Cuzick J. 2005. Rank regression. Encyclopedia of biostatistics vol 6. Wiley and Sons. de Souza JF, Fragelli CB, Jeremias F, Paschoal MAB, Santos-Pinto L, de Cassia Loiola Cordeiro R. 2017. • Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization. Clinical oral investigations. 21(5):1725-1733. • Dworkin SL. 2012. Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of sexual behavior. 41(6):1319-1320. • Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. 2016. Consort 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Bmj. 355:i5239

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Molar Hypomineralization

Interventions

Composite Resins

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Enamel HypomineralizationDevelopmental Defects of EnamelTooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Resins, SyntheticPlasticsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesDental MaterialsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinding to the child participants and legal guardian of each participating child, operator, outcome assessor and statistician.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2020

First Posted

December 4, 2020

Study Start

July 4, 2021

Primary Completion

September 3, 2023

Study Completion

November 5, 2023

Last Updated

February 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations