Zirconia Versus Lithium Di-silicate Overlays for Restoring Hypomineralized Molars Affected With MIH
Clinical Outcome of Zirconia Versus Lithium Di-silicate Overlays Restorations for Restoring Vital Young Permanent First Molar Teeth Affected With Moderate Form of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the study evaluate the clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restorations for restoring vital young permanent first molar teeth affected with moderate form of molar Incisor hypomineralization: randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2022
CompletedFebruary 3, 2023
February 1, 2023
1 year
September 2, 2022
February 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Outcome
compare the one-year clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restoration of vital young permanent first molar teeth affected with moderate form of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
one year
Restoration Evaluation
Restorations were assessed clinically using dental explorer, mirror and radiographically according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria over one-year period at (base line "1 week", 3, 6 and 12 months) afterward cementation. There were three assessment categories (esthetics, function, biological) each with five subcategories. From best to worst, the subcategories were: (1) clinically excellent, (2) clinically good, (3) clinically sufficient, (4) clinically not sufficient but repairable and (5) clinically unacceptable. Assessment with category (5) was rated as a clinical failure. Statistical analysis for baseline and follow-up criteria was performed with Wilcoxon-Test (p\<0.05) (SPSS; IBM,Chicago, IL).
one year
Study Arms (2)
Group (Z)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients received zirconia restorations group
Group (EC)
EXPERIMENTALpatients received IPS E.max Cad restorations group
Interventions
Lithium Disilicate partial coverage of hypo-mineralized defected enamel
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children's age ranging from 10 to 15 years old.
- Existence of large carious lesion in young permanent first molar teeth associated with weak cusps.
- Signs of vital pulp without symptoms of pulpitis.
- Presence of antagonists and adjacent teeth and occlusal contacts with good level of oral hygiene.
- Children should be able to physically and psychologically tolerate conventional restorative procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with poor oral hygiene and symptoms of pulpitis.
- Children suffer from parafunctional habits.
- Children with any debilitating systemic disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-Azhar University
Cairo, Naser City, 11884, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
alaa F mohammed, Ph. D
Al-Azhar University- faculty of dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of Pediatric dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2022
First Posted
September 7, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 20, 2022
Last Updated
February 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- one year
- Access Criteria
- alaaaldehna.26@azhar.edu.eg
Twenty patients were distributed into two groups in relation to the material used for the fabrication of overlays restorations; group (Z) (n=10): patients received zirconia restorations, group (EC): patients received IPS E.max Cad restorations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of these restorations were carried out at base line (1 week), 3, 6 and 12 months after cementation using FDI World Dental Federation criteria