NCT05529329

Brief Summary

the study evaluate the clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restorations for restoring vital young permanent first molar teeth affected with moderate form of molar Incisor hypomineralization: randomized clinical trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 2, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

MIH - zironia - Lithium Disilicate - Overlays

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Outcome

    compare the one-year clinical outcome of zirconia versus lithium disilicate overlays restoration of vital young permanent first molar teeth affected with moderate form of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

    one year

  • Restoration Evaluation

    Restorations were assessed clinically using dental explorer, mirror and radiographically according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria over one-year period at (base line "1 week", 3, 6 and 12 months) afterward cementation. There were three assessment categories (esthetics, function, biological) each with five subcategories. From best to worst, the subcategories were: (1) clinically excellent, (2) clinically good, (3) clinically sufficient, (4) clinically not sufficient but repairable and (5) clinically unacceptable. Assessment with category (5) was rated as a clinical failure. Statistical analysis for baseline and follow-up criteria was performed with Wilcoxon-Test (p\<0.05) (SPSS; IBM,Chicago, IL).

    one year

Study Arms (2)

Group (Z)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients received zirconia restorations group

Procedure: overlay

Group (EC)

EXPERIMENTAL

patients received IPS E.max Cad restorations group

Procedure: overlay

Interventions

overlayPROCEDURE

Lithium Disilicate partial coverage of hypo-mineralized defected enamel

Also known as: Zirconia partial coverage of hypo-mineralized defected enamel
Group (EC)Group (Z)

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children's age ranging from 10 to 15 years old.
  • Existence of large carious lesion in young permanent first molar teeth associated with weak cusps.
  • Signs of vital pulp without symptoms of pulpitis.
  • Presence of antagonists and adjacent teeth and occlusal contacts with good level of oral hygiene.
  • Children should be able to physically and psychologically tolerate conventional restorative procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with poor oral hygiene and symptoms of pulpitis.
  • Children suffer from parafunctional habits.
  • Children with any debilitating systemic disorder.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Al-Azhar University

Cairo, Naser City, 11884, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Molar Hypomineralization

Interventions

Denture, Overlay

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Enamel HypomineralizationDevelopmental Defects of EnamelTooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DenturesDental ProsthesisProsthodonticsDentistryProstheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • alaa F mohammed, Ph. D

    Al-Azhar University- faculty of dentistry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Clinical Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
lecturer of Pediatric dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2022

First Posted

September 7, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

April 1, 2022

Study Completion

August 20, 2022

Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Twenty patients were distributed into two groups in relation to the material used for the fabrication of overlays restorations; group (Z) (n=10): patients received zirconia restorations, group (EC): patients received IPS E.max Cad restorations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of these restorations were carried out at base line (1 week), 3, 6 and 12 months after cementation using FDI World Dental Federation criteria

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
one year
Access Criteria
alaaaldehna.26@azhar.edu.eg

Locations