Exploring the Time Effect of Respiratory Muscle Training on the Pulmonary Function of Elderly People
Comparative Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training Versus Aerobic Exercise on Cardiopulmonary Function in Older Adults: Determination of Temporal Adaptation Thresholds
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effects of a 12-week respiratory muscle training (RMT) intervention on cardiopulmonary function and compare its efficacy with aerobic exercise in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What are the effects of RMT compared to aerobic exercise on cardiopulmonary function?
- What is the minimal effective duration (temporal threshold) for observable physiological adaptations to RMT?
- To what extent are the training effects retained at 4-weeks post-intervention? Participants were randomly divided into RMT group and aerobic exercise group. The RMT group performed 12 weeks of progressive resistance training (initial, moderate, and high levels) using the Lung Fitness® breathing trainer, consisting of 10 breaths per set, 3 sets per session, twice daily (morning and evening), 5 days per week. The Aerobic Exercise group performed daily 10,000-step walking sessions 5 days per week, with exercise adherence assessed using the Exercise Adherence Questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2025
CompletedJune 29, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.1 years
June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inspiratory muscle function
Inspiratory muscle function was quantified using a calibrated POWERbreathe K5 device (POWERbreathe International, Ltd., Southam, UK). Following standardized procedures \[18\], MIP and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) were recorded. Three technically acceptable maneuvers were performed at each session, with the highest value retained for analysis (coefficient of variation \<10%).
Each subject was tested at five standardized time points (baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12 [post-intervention], and week 16 [post-detraining]).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pulmonary function
Each subject was tested at five standardized time points (baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12 [post-intervention], and week 16 [post-detraining]).
Other Outcomes (1)
6MWT
Each subject was tested at five standardized time points (baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12 [post-intervention], and week 16 [post-detraining]).
Study Arms (2)
Aerobic Exercise Group
EXPERIMENTAL* Performed daily 10,000-step walking (5 days/week) * Exercise adherence was assessed using the Exercise Adherence Questionnaire
Respiratory Muscle Training (RMT) Group
EXPERIMENTAL* Performed 12-week progressive resistance training using the Lung Fitness breathing trainer (initial/moderate/high resistance levels) * Training protocol: 10 breaths/set, 3 sets/session (morning and evening), 5 days/week * Technique specification: 1. Diaphragmatic breathing pattern 2. Complete breath cycle = 1 repetition (inhalation ≤3s, exhalation ≤6s) * Resistance progression: * Initial level: Expiratory resistance - Level 1; Inspiratory resistance - Level 2 * Moderate level: Expiratory resistance - Level 2; Inspiratory resistance - Level 3 * High level: Expiratory resistance - Level 3; Inspiratory resistance - Level 4
Interventions
Performed 12-week progressive resistance training using the Lung Fitness® breathing trainer (initial/moderate/high resistance levels)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older adults aged 60-75 years; Regardless of sex; Individuals classified as either physically inactive or habitual exercisers;
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with cardiorespiratory diseases, hypertension, metabolic disorders, or other underlying medical conditions; Persons with impaired mobility, exercise contraindications, or inability to complete the exercise protocol; Inability to independently complete a Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Sports University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100084, China
Related Publications (1)
Rodrigues GD, Dal Lago P, da Silva Soares PP. Time-dependent effects of inspiratory muscle training and detraining on cardiac autonomic control in older women. Exp Gerontol. 2021 Jul 15;150:111357. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111357. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PMID: 33864832BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mei Xue Li, Doctor
Beijing Sports University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xu Guo, Master
Beijing Sports University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2025
First Posted
June 29, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06