NCT07040423

Brief Summary

This study uses MRI imaging to evaluate the spread of local anesthetic following the administration of a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. The goal is to determine whether a distinct fascial plane exists between neurovascular structures, potentially explaining the block's observed clinical effectiveness.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Jun 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress70%
Jun 2025Oct 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

June 27, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

AnestheticsAnesthetics, LocalPainAcute PainPENG blockPelvic MRIRegional anesthesiaFascial planeLocal anesthetic spread

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Extent of local anesthetic spread as visualized on MRI after PENG block administration

    MRI images will be used to assess the diffusion pattern of local anesthetic following PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block. The assessment will focus on whether the anesthetic reaches a specific fascial plane between the femoral vessels and nerves. A radiologist will evaluate the extent and location of the anesthetic spread in relation to key anatomical landmarks (according to centimeter-based measurements as per MRI protocols).

    10 minutes after injection

Study Arms (1)

PENG Block with MRI-Based Local Anesthetic Spread Assessment

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients receive standardized multimodal analgesia before surgery. Patients in this arm receive an ultrasound-guided PENG block in the supine position under sterile conditions. A low-frequency (2-5 MHz) curvilinear probe is placed above the AIIS and rotated \~45° to align with the pubic ramus. Using an in-plane lateral-to-medial approach, a 10 cm, 20G needle is advanced to the interfascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and pubic ramus. After negative aspiration, ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% is injected in 5 mL increments up to 20 mL, observing spread via ultrasound. A pelvic MRI is then performed to assess anesthetic diffusion before the patient proceeds to total hip arthroplasty.

Procedure: PENG BlockProcedure: Magnetic resonance imaging

Interventions

PENG BlockPROCEDURE

Preoperative ultrasound giuded PENG block (ropivacaine 0,5% 20mL)

PENG Block with MRI-Based Local Anesthetic Spread Assessment

The patient will undergo a pelvic MRI to assess anesthetic diffusion after PENG block

PENG Block with MRI-Based Local Anesthetic Spread Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for total hip replacement surgery
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ASA physical status classification I-III
  • Signed informed consent obtained
  • Orthopedic indication for preoperative MRI study

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Infection at the planned puncture site
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Claustrophobia
  • Altered consciousness or severe dementia
  • Presence of MRI-incompatible implanted devices (e.g., pacemakers implanted before 2000)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico

Roma, Italy, 00128, Italy

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Gargano F, Migliorelli S, Pascarella G, Costa F, Strumia A, Bellezze A, Ruggiero A, Carassiti M. A randomized clinical trial comparing different combination of peripheral nerve blocks for intraoperative analgesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs undergoing hip fracture surgery: pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus femoral and obturator nerve block. Minerva Anestesiol. 2025 Jun;91(6):524-532. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18534-3. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

    PMID: 39656148BACKGROUND
  • Nielsen ND, Greher M, Moriggl B, Hoermann R, Nielsen TD, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Spread of injectate around hip articular sensory branches of the femoral nerve in cadavers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):1001-1006. doi: 10.1111/aas.13122. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

    PMID: 29664158BACKGROUND
  • Pascarella G, Costa F, Del Buono R, Pulitano R, Strumia A, Piliego C, De Quattro E, Cataldo R, Agro FE, Carassiti M; collaborators. Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1492-1498. doi: 10.1111/anae.15536. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

    PMID: 34196965BACKGROUND
  • Sakamoto J, Manabe Y, Oyamada J, Kataoka H, Nakano J, Saiki K, Okamoto K, Tsurumoto T, Okita M. Anatomical study of the articular branches innervated the hip and knee joint with reference to mechanism of referral pain in hip joint disease patients. Clin Anat. 2018 Jul;31(5):705-709. doi: 10.1002/ca.23077. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

    PMID: 29577432BACKGROUND
  • Lee DJ, Elfar JC. Timing of hip fracture surgery in the elderly. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2014 Sep;5(3):138-40. doi: 10.1177/2151458514537273.

    PMID: 25360345BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAcute Pain

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Francesca Gargano, Medical Doctor

    Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical doctor, Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2025

First Posted

June 27, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations