NCT07024186

Brief Summary

This study compares two methods used to improve gingival tissue around dental implants placed in (the maxillary esthetic zone). After a tooth is removed and a dental implant is placed early (usually 4-8 weeks later), additional soft tissue is sometimes needed to ensure the implant looks natural and functions well. The two techniques being studied are: Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) - where tissue is taken from the patient's own mouth (usually the palate) Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) - a processed collagen material from animals, used as a substitute for the patient's own tissue. The goal is to see which method is better in terms of gingival thickness, esthetic appearance, healing, and patient comfort. This research may help dentists choose the most effective and comfortable treatment for their patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 17, 2022

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 8, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Xenogenic Collagen MatrixConnective Tissue GraftSoft Tissue Augmentation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Peri-implant soft tissue thickness

    change in soft tissue thickness measured in millimeters at the buccal aspect of the implant site.

    12 months after implant placement

Study Arms (2)

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm involves the use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Procedure: Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm involves the use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Procedure: subepithelial connective tissue graft

Interventions

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix The xenogeneic collagen matrix is a biomaterial used to promote soft tissue regeneration and support healing in dental implant procedures.

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

ubepithelial Connective Tissue Graft The subepithelial connective tissue graft is a biological tissue taken from the patient's own palate or other donor sites to promote healing and aesthetic outcomes around dental implants.

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Non-restorable or hopeless teeth from maxillary anterior to first premolar due to one or more of the following:
  • Extensive caries
  • Root fractures
  • Inability to perform functional crown lengthening due to gingival zenith line with high gingival display
  • Improper crown-to-root ratio due to bone removal leading to aesthetic or restorative failure
  • Patients aged 25-55 years
  • Both male and female patients
  • Thin tissue biotype

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Smokers
  • Presence of persistent chronic infection at the implant site
  • Patients in the growth phase with partially erupted teeth
  • Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching that may overload the implant
  • Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space in centric occlusion to accommodate restorative components

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Minya

Minya, Minya Governorate, 61519, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone LossGingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesGingival Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mohamed O Ismail, MSc

    Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The outcomes assessor responsible for evaluating soft tissue volume and esthetic results is blinded to the group allocation to reduce assessment bias. Participants and care providers are not blinded due to the nature of the surgical interventions.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are assigned in parallel to either the xenogeneic collagen matrix group or the subepithelial connective tissue graft group for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Group allocation is determined by simple randomization using a coin toss.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Candidate, Faculty of Dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2025

First Posted

June 17, 2025

Study Start

March 17, 2022

Primary Completion

November 8, 2024

Study Completion

February 20, 2025

Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations