Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Early Maxillary Implants
Soft Tissue Augmentation by Xenogenic Collagen Matrix Versus Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft Around Early Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two methods used to improve gingival tissue around dental implants placed in (the maxillary esthetic zone). After a tooth is removed and a dental implant is placed early (usually 4-8 weeks later), additional soft tissue is sometimes needed to ensure the implant looks natural and functions well. The two techniques being studied are: Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) - where tissue is taken from the patient's own mouth (usually the palate) Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) - a processed collagen material from animals, used as a substitute for the patient's own tissue. The goal is to see which method is better in terms of gingival thickness, esthetic appearance, healing, and patient comfort. This research may help dentists choose the most effective and comfortable treatment for their patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 17, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2025
CompletedJune 17, 2025
June 1, 2025
2.6 years
May 12, 2025
June 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peri-implant soft tissue thickness
change in soft tissue thickness measured in millimeters at the buccal aspect of the implant site.
12 months after implant placement
Study Arms (2)
Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm involves the use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm involves the use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.
Interventions
Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix The xenogeneic collagen matrix is a biomaterial used to promote soft tissue regeneration and support healing in dental implant procedures.
ubepithelial Connective Tissue Graft The subepithelial connective tissue graft is a biological tissue taken from the patient's own palate or other donor sites to promote healing and aesthetic outcomes around dental implants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-restorable or hopeless teeth from maxillary anterior to first premolar due to one or more of the following:
- Extensive caries
- Root fractures
- Inability to perform functional crown lengthening due to gingival zenith line with high gingival display
- Improper crown-to-root ratio due to bone removal leading to aesthetic or restorative failure
- Patients aged 25-55 years
- Both male and female patients
- Thin tissue biotype
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Smokers
- Presence of persistent chronic infection at the implant site
- Patients in the growth phase with partially erupted teeth
- Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching that may overload the implant
- Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space in centric occlusion to accommodate restorative components
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Minia Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Minya
Minya, Minya Governorate, 61519, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed O Ismail, MSc
Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor responsible for evaluating soft tissue volume and esthetic results is blinded to the group allocation to reduce assessment bias. Participants and care providers are not blinded due to the nature of the surgical interventions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Candidate, Faculty of Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2025
First Posted
June 17, 2025
Study Start
March 17, 2022
Primary Completion
November 8, 2024
Study Completion
February 20, 2025
Last Updated
June 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06