Nalbuphine Dosing and Its Impact on Anxiety and Depression in Ectopic Pregnancy Surgery
Effects of Different Doses of Nalbuphine on Anxiety and Depression in Patients Undergoing Ectopic Pregnancy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
165
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, controlled study aims to evaluate the impact of different doses of nalbuphine on anxiety and depression in patients undergoing surgery for ectopic pregnancy. Ectopic pregnancy, which occurs in approximately 2% of all pregnancies, often requires surgical intervention, leading to potential psychological distress such as anxiety and depression in affected women. Effective postoperative pain management is essential to enhance recovery and reduce emotional disturbances. The study will involve 165 eligible patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy at Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups, each receiving a different concentration of nalbuphine combined with metoclopramide for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome will focus on changes in anxiety and depression scores measured on postoperative day three, while secondary outcomes will assess pain levels, the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), the necessity for rescue analgesics, and the occurrence of adverse reactions. Sample size calculations suggest that at least 165 participants are required to achieve adequate statistical power. Data will be analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software, with results expected to provide insights into the effectiveness of nalbuphine in improving postoperative recovery and mental health in women experiencing ectopic pregnancy. The study has received ethical approval and is funded by the Chengdu Medical Research Projects (No. 2023465, 2022548, and 2023304).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedJune 8, 2025
June 1, 2025
4 months
May 27, 2025
June 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Anxiety and Depression Scores
The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the levels of anxiety and depression in patients following surgery for ectopic pregnancy. This will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the following specific time point:
Day 3 post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
Postoperative 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours
Effective Presses of the Pain Pump
48 hours post-surgery
Need for Rescue Analgesia
48 hours post-surgery
Number of participants experience feelings of drowsiness
day 2 post-surgery
Time to Ambulate
Perioperative
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
N1 Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.20 mg/ml, totaling 30 mg, combined with 10 mg of Metoclopramide for postoperative analgesia. This group aims to evaluate the effects of this specific dosing on anxiety and depression levels following ectopic pregnancy surgery.
N2 Group
EXPERIMENTALarticipants in this group will be administered Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.27 mg/ml, totaling 40 mg, along with 10 mg of Metoclopramide for postoperative pain management. The focus will be on assessing the impact of this dosage on the patients' anxiety and depression scores post-surgery.
N3 Group
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals in this group will receive Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.33 mg/ml for a total of 50 mg, paired with 10 mg of Metoclopramide for effective postoperative analgesia. This group will help determine the effects of this higher dosage on levels of anxiety and depression after surgery for ectopic pregnancy.
Interventions
In this group, participants will receive an intravenous infusion of Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.20 mg/ml, which delivers a total of 30 mg over the course of 48 hours. Additionally, 10 mg of Metoclopramide will be administered to manage potential postoperative nausea. This intervention aims to assess the analgesic efficacy and its subsequent effect on psychological outcomes, specifically anxiety and depression, in patients undergoing surgery for ectopic pregnancy.
Participants assigned to this group will be treated with an intravenous infusion of Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.27 mg/ml, resulting in a total dosage of 40 mg administered during the 48-hour postoperative period. They will also receive 10 mg of Metoclopramide to mitigate nausea and vomiting. This intervention is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of this dose in pain management and its influence on anxiety and depression levels post-surgery.
In this group, subjects will receive Nalbuphine at a concentration of 0.33 mg/ml, totaling 50 mg, delivered through intravenous infusion for 48 hours. Along with this, 10 mg of Metoclopramide will be included to address potential postoperative discomfort. This intervention seeks to explore how this higher concentration impacts pain relief and subsequent psychological effects, specifically targeting anxiety and depression following ectopic pregnancy surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, aged ≥18 years, and with normal psychological status.
- Patients planned to undergo single-port laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, followed by postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).
- Patients classified as ASA I or II.
- Able to understand the study process and methods, voluntarily participate, and sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients using other analgesic methods or multiple analgesic approaches.
- Patients with a history of allergies or allergies to anesthetic drugs.
- Patients with a history of depression or mental illness.
- Patients with other severe organ dysfunction.
- Patients unable to operate the intravenous analgesia pump independently.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Bollig KJ, Friedlander H, Schust DJ. Ectopic Pregnancy and Lifesaving Care. JAMA. 2023 Jun 20;329(23):2086-2087. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7292.
PMID: 37261808BACKGROUNDFarren J, Jalmbrant M, Falconieri N, Mitchell-Jones N, Bobdiwala S, Al-Memar M, Tapp S, Van Calster B, Wynants L, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Posttraumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):367.e1-367.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.102. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
PMID: 31953115BACKGROUNDFarren J, Jalmbrant M, Falconieri N, Mitchell-Jones N, Bobdiwala S, Al-Memar M, Tapp S, Van Calster B, Wynants L, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Differences in post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy between women and their partners: multicenter prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):141-148. doi: 10.1002/uog.23147.
PMID: 33032364BACKGROUNDPan X, Wang J, Lin Z, Dai W, Shi Z. Depression and Anxiety Are Risk Factors for Postoperative Pain-Related Symptoms and Complications in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2337-2346. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 May 28.
PMID: 31229373BACKGROUNDAkshat S, Ramachandran R, Rewari V, Chandralekha, Trikha A, Sinha R. Morphine versus Nalbuphine for Open Gynaecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double Blinded Trial. Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:727952. doi: 10.1155/2014/727952. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
PMID: 24834352BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study employs a randomized, double-blind design to ensure that both the participants and the assessors are unaware of their respective treatment assignments. All patients will be randomly assigned to three groups, receiving different concentrations of nalbuphine via a pain management pump, while the researchers conducting postoperative evaluations (including anxiety, depression, and pain scores) will remain blind to the specific group assignments. Data analysis will also be conducted in a blinded manner to minimize bias. This comprehensive masking approach aims to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the study's results, accurately assessing the impact of nalbuphine on postoperative psychological and pain management in patients with ectopic pregnancy.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Anesthesiology Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2025
First Posted
June 8, 2025
Study Start
June 20, 2025
Primary Completion
October 22, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For our study "Effects of Different Doses of Nalbuphine on Anxiety and Depression in Patients Undergoing Ectopic Pregnancy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study" we have decided not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD). This decision is due to privacy concerns, data security requirements, ethical approval limitations, legal restrictions, and the study's design which did not accommodate data sharing. We believe this aligns with ethical standards and operational capabilities.