Sucralose as a Way to Enhance Regulatory T Cells
SWEET
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Title: Taking the SWEET approach to protect the transplanted kidney. Background: Kidneys are essential organs in our body. When they do not work, patients require machines to help them or receive a new kidney from a donor (transplantation) to survive. Thus far, transplantation is the best treatment. However, the immune system will recognize the new kidney as foreign and try to destroy it, which is called kidney rejection. To prevent rejection, patients with kidney transplants depend on drugs to suppress the immune system. However, these drugs have many side effects, including the risk of infection, cancer, and diabetes. The immune system is made of many different types of cells. One cell type in particular is T cells that, when kept unchecked, will attack the kidney transplant. However, there is a small subset of these T cells called regulatory T cells (Tregs) that police the immune system and aid in accepting the new kidney. Current ways to increase these police cells (Tregs) after a transplant are expensive and not widely available. Therefore, there is a need to find a better and more accessible way to increase Treg numbers after a transplant to increase the longevity of the newly transplanted kidney. What we eat is critical in shaping the immune system. Artificial sweeteners, like sucralose (found in Splenda), are often used as a sugar substitute. They are low in calories and safe to consume. However, recent studies suggest they may have unexpected effects on the body. Research in mice has shown that sucralose impacts the immune system. Specifically, the investigators have found that it could suppress T cells that could cause kidney rejection while increasing the Tregs (the police). Given these findings, the investigators hypothesize that sucralose could be beneficial in conditions where dampening the immune system is desirable, such as in the case of transplantation. By boosting Tregs and reducing the anti-transplant T cells, sucralose may help to protect against organ rejection. Purpose: The goal of this study is thus to test whether sucralose can safely and effectively modulate the immune system in humans. Method: The investigator propose to test the impact of sucralose on the immune system. This pilot study will test the effect of sucralose in 10 healthy volunteers. The participants will take sucralose or placebo as a pill twice daily for a month. Healthy volunteers will then stop for a two weeks (washout period). After the washout period, the volunteers on sucralose will switch to placebo, while the placebo group will switch to sucralose pills for one more months. The investigators will take blood samples at the beginning, after one month, after the washout and at the end of the study to study how the immune system changes. Anticipated outcomes: The investigators expect that sucralose will impact the immune system and increase the number of regulatory T cells. Relevance to patient/community: Artificial sweeteners are commonly used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. However, their impact on the immune system has not been thoroughly investigated in humans. Conclusion: Kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for kidney failure, but the immune system's rejection of the transplanted organ remains a major challenge. Current immunosuppressive drugs used to prevent rejection have significant side effects, underscoring the need for safer alternatives. The investigator research suggests that sucralose, a widely used artificial sweetener, may offer a novel solution by increasing the good T cells (Tregs) and reducing harmful T cells that contribute to rejection. This pilot study will explore sucralose's potential to modulate the immune system in humans, potentially leading to improved transplant outcomes and broader implications for immune regulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
June 5, 2025
January 1, 2025
1 year
December 20, 2024
June 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Regulatory T cells
Change in % regulatory T cells on total CD4+ T cells compared to baseline
After 4 weeks on sucralose and placebo.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
T cell cytokine production (TNFa, IFNy, IL2)
4 weeks compared to baseline on either placebo or sucralose
Frequency of immune populations in the blood (CD4+, CD8+, NK, B cells, CD11b myeloid cells)
4 weeks compared to baseline on either sucralose or placebo
Frequency of CD4+ T cells lineages
4 weeks compared to baseline on sucralose or placebo
Frequency of naive, central and effector memory or terminally differentiated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
4 weeks compared to baseline on both sucralose or placebo
Study Arms (2)
Starting with placebo - washout - sucralose.
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group will start with a placebo (4 weeks) , then will have a washout period (2 weeks) and then will test sucralose (4 weeks)
Starting with sucralose - washout - placebo.
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will start with sucralose (4 weeks) , then will have a washout period (2 weeks) and then will test the placebo (4 weeks)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Body weight comparable to average reported in Canada
You may not qualify if:
- Past medical history of autoimmune disease
- The use of any regular medication except contraceptive pills
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Caroline Lamarchelead
- Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, clinical assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2024
First Posted
May 30, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share