NCT05250622

Brief Summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to clarify whether providing translated evidence summary (Advanced Clinical Evidence (ACE) reports from OrthoEvidence) will increase the access to the summary compared to providing the original version of evidence summary among Japanese orthopaedic surgeons

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2022

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 22, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 8, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 29, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 31, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 30, 2022

Conditions

Healthy Volunteer

Keywords

Surveys and QuestionnairesClinical CompetenceOrthopedicsAttitude of Health PersonnelEvidence-based medicine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of access to evidence summaries

    Total number of access to evidence summaries

    Four weeks (28 days) after the commencement of the trial

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Self-rated score of understanding the contents of the provided materials

    Within four weeks after the end of intervention

  • Self-rated score in changing their practice based on the contents of the materials

    Within four weeks after the end of intervention

Study Arms (2)

Japanese group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who will receive Japanese-translated version of evidence summaries

Other: Japanese-translated evidence summaries (Advanced Clinical Evidence report from OrthoEvidence)

English group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants who will receive English version of evidence summaries

Other: English evidence summaries (Advanced Clinical Evidence report from OrthoEvidence)

Interventions

Japanese-translated evidence summaries (Advanced Clinical Evidence report from OrthoEvidence)OTHER

Participants will receive emails with the link to Japanese-translated version of evidence summaries.

Japanese group
English evidence summaries (Advanced Clinical Evidence report from OrthoEvidence)OTHER

Participants will receive emails with the link to English version of evidence summaries.

English group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Member of Japanese Society for Fracture Repair (JSFR)
  • Spend at least 20% of their time in clinical practice
  • Non-native speaker of English
  • Has regular access to internet
  • Prefer to read Japanese-translated material, if there are both translated and English version of the same material.

You may not qualify if:

  • We will exclude surgeons who cannot provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4E8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Sprague S, Smith C, Bhandari M. OrthoEvidence: A Clinical Resource for Evidence-Based Orthopedics. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015 Jun 3;7(2):5762. doi: 10.4081/or.2015.5762. eCollection 2015 Jun 3.

    PMID: 26330990BACKGROUND

  • Poolman RW, Sierevelt IN, Farrokhyar F, Mazel JA, Blankevoort L, Bhandari M. Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: Are surgeons getting better? A questionnaire survey of members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):206-15. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00633.

    PMID: 17200328BACKGROUND

  • Dahm P, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Fesperman SF, Baum J, Kosiak B, Carrick T, Preminger GM; American Urological Association Membership. Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: a survey of the American Urological Association Membership. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):767-77. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

    PMID: 19091333BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Kim Madden, PhD

    McMaster University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2022

First Posted

February 22, 2022

Study Start

April 8, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2022

Study Completion

July 29, 2022

Last Updated

August 2, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

CA(1)