NCT06991140

Brief Summary

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints worldwide and is an important health problem that restricts the daily life activities of individuals. In particular, chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) describes pain that persists for at least 12 weeks without an underlying specific pathological cause and affects a large segment of the population. CNSNP leads not only to pain but also to functional limitations, postural disorders and decreased quality of life. In recent years, exercise-based approaches, especially core stabilisation exercises, have become prominent in the treatment of CNSNP. Core stabilisation exercises aim to increase postural control, improve segmental stability and thus reduce pain by activating deep muscle groups around the spine. However, it has been reported that exercises targeting only local muscle groups may be insufficient to meet the high-level biomechanical and neuromuscular needs of the cervical spine. In this context, the effect of the mobility of the thoracic spine on neck function is noteworthy. Hypomobility in the thoracic region may contribute to pain and dysfunction by increasing the load on the cervical spine. Therefore, it is thought that adding thoracic mobilisation exercises to core stabilisation exercises may be more effective in improving neck pain and postural disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding thoracic mobilisation to a core stabilisation exercise programme in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

neck painmobilization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Severity

    Visual Analogue Scale was used to determine severity of low back pain in the study participants. Visual Analogue Scale is a practical test with high validity and reliability in pain assessment. Visual Analogue Scale is an assessment method numbered from 0 to 10, where '0' indicates no pain and '10' indicates the presence of the most severe pain. Participants were asked to mark the degree of pain they had on this scale and recorded.

    6 week

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Disability

    6 week

  • Cervical muscle strength

    6 week

  • Spine Assessment

    6 week

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Core stabilisation exercises applied to both groups of the study were structured to target the activation of deep muscle groups supporting the stability of the cervical and thoracic spine. The exercise programme was performed 3 days a week for a total of 6 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The programme included exercises to improve head and neck control (chin tuck, head lift in supine position), exercises to improve scapular stability (scapular retraction, wall slide, serratus anterior activation) and exercises to improve trunk control in neutral spine position (arm and leg extension in four-point position, plank variations). The exercises were gradually made more difficult according to the tolerance of the individuals and each session lasted approximately 40-45 minutes. By ensuring that the exercises were performed in the correct form and in a controlled manner, overloading of the musculoskeletal system was prevented.

Other: Core Stabilization Exercises

Thorocal mobilization group

EXPERIMENTAL

Thoracic mobilisation exercises were performed 3 days a week for a total of 6 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Thoracic mobilisation programme consisted of active self-mobilisation techniques, mobilisation exercises with foam rollers, stretching exercises including thoracic rotation and extension movements and dynamic postural exercises. Especially 'thread the needle' exercise in sitting or quadruped position, 'thoracic extension press-up' in prone position and 'extension on foam rollers' were preferred to increase the mobility of thoracic vertebral segments. The exercises were gradually made more difficult according to the tolerance of the individuals. Each exercise was performed as 10-15 repetitions and 2-3 sets. Exercise safety was ensured by informing the patients about the correct posture and movement patterns before all applications. The main aim of the exercises was to alleviate the mechanical load of the cervicothoracic transition by reducing thoracic hypomobi

Other: Thorocal Mobilization ExercisesOther: Core Stabilization Exercises

Interventions

Thoracic mobilisation exercises were performed 3 days a week for a total of 6 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Thoracic mobilisation programme consisted of active self-mobilisation techniques, mobilisation exercises with foam rollers, stretching exercises including thoracic rotation and extension movements and dynamic postural exercises. Especially 'thread the needle' exercise in sitting or quadruped position, 'thoracic extension press-up' in prone position and 'extension on foam rollers' were preferred to increase the mobility of thoracic vertebral segments. The exercises were gradually made more difficult according to the tolerance of the individuals. Each exercise was performed as 10-15 repetitions and 2-3 sets. Exercise safety was ensured by informing the patients about the correct posture and movement patterns before all applications.

Thorocal mobilization group

Core stabilization exercises were structured to target activation of deep muscle groups supporting cervical and thoracic spine stability. The exercise programme was performed 3 days a week for a total of 6 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The programme included exercises to improve head and neck control (chin tuck, head lift in supine position), exercises to improve scapular stability (scapular retraction, wall slide, serratus anterior activation) and exercises to improve trunk control in neutral spine position (arm and leg extension in four-point position, plank variations). The exercises were gradually made more difficult according to the tolerance of the individuals and each session lasted approximately 40-45 minutes. By ensuring that the exercises were performed in the correct form and in a controlled manner, overloading of the musculoskeletal system was prevented.

Control GroupThorocal mobilization group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be between the ages of 18-65,
  • months of persistent neck pain,
  • Being sedentary,
  • Not being involved in any physiotherapy programme in the last 6 months

You may not qualify if:

  • History of previous spinal surgery or trauma,
  • Neurological deficit, vestibular pathology, neurological, cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal problems affecting physical performance, any pathology in the shoulder joint, any pathology in the jaw joint and pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University

Kırşehir, Kırşehir, 40100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mehmet CANLI, PhD.

    Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: randomized controlled trials
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2025

First Posted

May 25, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations