Virtual Reality in Chronic Neck Pain
Effectiveness of Exercise Training and Virtual Reality on Disability, Pain and Joint Position Sense in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality, which encourages active neck movements, in individuals with chronic neck pain, with the control group receiving only neck exercises. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups; Half of them will be given only a neck exercises program, and the other half will be given neck exercises and virtual reality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 15, 2024
August 1, 2024
10 months
August 8, 2024
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neck disability index
Neck disability index was used to determine the pain experience and functional disability of the participants. It consists of 10 questions concern of the pain severity, ability for personal care, lifting weight, job capability headache intensity, concentration, quality of sleeping and driving and recreation activities. Total score ranges between 0 to 50 points. Zero to four points mean "no disability", 5 to 14 points mean "light disability", 15 to 24 points mean "moderate disability", 25 to 34 points mean "severe disability", and 35 to 50 points mean "complete disability".
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Visual analog scale
8 weeks
Joint position sense error
8 weeks
Pressure pain threshold
8 weeks
joint range of motion
8 weeks
Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire
8 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VR and exercise
EXPERIMENTALvirtual reality and neck exercises
exercise
SHAM COMPARATORonly neck exercise
Interventions
Participants will perform a 20-minute exercise program consisting of neck joint mobility exercises, neck and scapulothoracic muscle strengthening exercises, and stretching exercises. Then, for the next 20 minutes, they will engage in active neck movements using the Oculus Quest2 headset with the Ocean Rift game.
The control group will perform a 40-minute same neck exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18 to 45
- Having a history of non-traumatic neck pain persisting for more than three months
- Having a Neck Disability Index score greater than 5 points
- Not having participated in a physiotherapy program for at least 3 months
- Being able to read and write in Turkish to understand, interpret, and respond to the questionnaires
You may not qualify if:
- Having a surgical history in the neck region
- Having cervical spine flexion, extension, and rotation range of motion \<10 degrees
- Having a history of rheumatologic, vestibular, neurological, or cardiopulmonary diseases
- Vertigo associated with neck pain
- Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures,spinal tumors
- Presence of radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Traumatic spinal cord injury
- Neck pain associated with progressive neurological deficits or loss of strength
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Koç Universitylead
- Biruni Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Koc University School of Medicine
Istanbul, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (13)
Ghamkhar L, Kahlaee AH. Are Ultrasonographic Measures of Cervical Flexor Muscles Correlated With Flexion Endurance in Chronic Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Participants? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):874-880. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000778.
PMID: 28644248BACKGROUNDChilds JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM, Sopky BJ, Godges JJ, Flynn TW; American Physical Therapy Association. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
PMID: 18758050BACKGROUNDAudette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
PMID: 20436238BACKGROUNDTousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, Breton E, Corriveau H. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242.
PMID: 16676874BACKGROUNDReddy RS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira AS, Tedla JS, Kandakurti PK, Kakaraparthi VN. Comparison of neck extensor muscle endurance and cervical proprioception between asymptomatic individuals and patients with chronic neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.040. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
PMID: 33992242BACKGROUNDWibault J, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N, Dedering A, Peolsson A. Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23473752BACKGROUNDClark P, Lavielle P, Martinez H. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;30(7):1584-8.
PMID: 12858463BACKGROUNDBolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(3):141-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.123333.
PMID: 11986574BACKGROUNDYlinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykanen M, Hakkinen A, Pohjolainen T, Karppi SL, Airaksinen O. Effect of long-term neck muscle training on pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2005 Dec;9(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.001.
PMID: 16246820BACKGROUNDTejera DM, Beltran-Alacreu H, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Leon Hernandez JV, Martin-Pintado-Zugasti A, Calvo-Lobo C, Gil-Martinez A, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of Virtual Reality versus Exercise on Pain, Functional, Somatosensory and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165950.
PMID: 32824394BACKGROUNDHanney WJ, Kolber MJ, George SZ, Young I, Patel CK, Cleland JA. Development of a preliminary clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain that may benefit from a standardized program of stretching and muscle performance exercise: a prospective cohort study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;8(6):756-76.
PMID: 24377062BACKGROUNDPeolsson A, Landen Ludvigsson M, Tigerfors AM, Peterson G. Effects of Neck-Specific Exercises Compared to Waiting List for Individuals With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.087. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
PMID: 26514296BACKGROUNDFalla D, Lindstrom R, Rechter L, Boudreau S, Petzke F. Effectiveness of an 8-week exercise programme on pain and specificity of neck muscle activity in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Pain. 2013 Nov;17(10):1517-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00321.x. Epub 2013 May 6.
PMID: 23649799BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2024
First Posted
August 12, 2024
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share