The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
Clinical Performance And Radiographic Assessment Of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Adhesive Vs. Universal Adhesive In Class II Carious Lesions
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
a two-year, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of a bioactive glass adhesive (Hi-Bond Universal) versus a conventional adhesive (OptiBond Universal) in Class II carious lesions. The study will assess clinical outcomes such as fracture resistance and marginal adaptation and radiographic evidence of dentin remineralization in 80 adult participants. Hypersensitivity and secondary caries development will also be monitored at multiple time points to determine comparative efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
May 25, 2025
May 1, 2025
2 years
May 8, 2025
May 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Performance - Functional Properties (Retention loss)
The clinical performance of the adhesive systems will be assessed based on the functional properties, specifically focusing on the retention of the composite Restoration Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials. Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Clinical Performance - Functional Properties (fracture of the material)
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Approximal Anatomical Form
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Marginal Adaptation
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Clinical Performance - Biological Properties (Caries at Restoration Margins)
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Postoperative Hypersensitivity
24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Optibond Universal adhesive
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the control group will receive a conventional universal adhesive (OptiBond Universal) applied after selective caries removal. The adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by placement of a nano-hybrid composite (Optishade Universal Kerr Dental).
Intervention - Hi-Bond Universal Adhesive
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive a bioactive glass-modified adhesive, Hi-Bond Universal (Mediclus, Korea). This adhesive releases calcium and phosphate ions to enhance dentin remineralization and reduce hypersensitivity, applied after selective caries removal and followed by composite restoration.
Interventions
A bioactive glass adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass designed to promote dentin remineralization, manufactured by Mediclus, Korea. It releases calcium and phosphate ions to enhance dentin sealing and reduce hypersensitivity The adhesive will be applied after selective caries removal following a standardized protocol: Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. Application of HI Bond Universal adhesive with agitation for 20 seconds. Light curing for 20 seconds using a LED curing device. Incremental application of a nano-hybrid composite (Optishade Universal Kerr Dental, USA). Occlusal adjustment, finishing, and polishing.
conventional universal adhesive designed for bonding composite restorations to enamel and dentin. The adhesive will be applied after selective caries removal following a standardized protocol: Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. Application of OptiBond Universal adhesive with agitation for 20 seconds. Light curing for 20 seconds using a LED curing device. Incremental application of a nano-hybrid composite (Optishade Universal Kerr Dental, USA). Occlusal adjustment, finishing, and polishing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 22 to 42 years.
- Presence of Class II carious lesions in posterior permanent teeth (ICDAS 5 \& 6).
- Radiographic evidence of caries extending to 50% of dentin with a radiopaque layer between the lesion and pulp chamber.
- Teeth with normal pulp vitality confirmed through cold pulp sensibility test.
- Teeth with no periapical pathosis on radiographic examination.
- Good oral hygiene as determined by the attending clinician.
- Willingness to sign the informed consent and comply with the 2-year follow-up protocol.
- Cooperative patients who can attend all follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to any of the restorative materials (OptiBond Universal or Hi-Bond Universal).
- Patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
- Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy during the study period.
- Patients with systemic diseases that could interfere with dental treatment (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular diseases).
- Use of analgesics or medications that could mask postoperative sensitivity.
- Teeth with previous restorations or treatment in the target area.
- Teeth exhibiting spontaneous pain or lingering pain after sensitivity testing, indicating irreversible pulpitis.
- Negative response in cold pulp sensibility test, indicating pulp necrosis.
- Teeth with periapical radiolucencies or signs of infection.
- Mobile teeth due to periodontal disease or trauma.
- Teeth with extensive structural damage, such as cusp fractures or deep cracks.
- Patients unable to comply with the follow-up schedule.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, 11559, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Ahmed Hesham Samaha, PhD candidate Conservative Dep
CONTACT
Prof. Dr. Rasha Raafat Main Supervisor / Data Monitoring, professor conservative depar.
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study employs a double-blinded design to minimize potential biases in outcome assessment and data analysis. The following masking strategy will be implemented: Participant Blinding: Participants will be unaware of the type of adhesive used during the restorative procedure. Both adhesives (Hi-Bond Universal and OptiBond Universal) will be applied using identical clinical procedures to maintain blinding. Outcomes Assessor Blinding: The outcomes assessors (N.S. and R.A.), responsible for evaluating clinical performance (fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, hypersensitivity) and radiographic assessments, will be blinded to the group assignment. They will not have access to information regarding the type of adhesive used for each patient. Operator (A.H.) Not Blinded: The operator performing the restorative procedures cannot be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. The operator will be aware of the adhesive used but will not participate in the outcome assessments.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD candidate Conservative Department Cairo University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05