Laser Photobiomodulation After Dental Implant Surgery: A Comparison of 650 nm and 810 nm Diode Lasers
Comparative Effects of 650 nm and 810 nm Diode Laser Photobiomodulation on Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Use, and OHRQoL After Dental Implant Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of laser light therapy, known as photobiomodulation (PBM), in reducing pain after dental implant surgery. The study involves adult patients receiving a single dental implant in the upper posterior (back) area of the mouth. Participants are randomly assigned to receive PBM using either a 650 nm red diode laser, an 810 nm infrared diode laser, or a sham (inactive) laser. The study aims to assess whether PBM therapy can reduce pain during the first three days after surgery, decrease the need for pain medication, and improve oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). PBM is applied immediately after surgery and again within 48 hours. Pain intensity is measured at multiple time points (2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours), analgesic use is recorded, and OHRQoL is evaluated using a standardized questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Aug 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 17, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedMay 25, 2025
May 1, 2025
10 months
May 14, 2025
May 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Intensity Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS: 0-10) at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Participants recorded the maximum pain experienced since the previous interval. Pain was analyzed in two ways: (1) Temporal analysis of mean NRS scores across Day 1 (defined as the highest score within 24 hours), Day 2, and Day 3 to assess daily pain evolution; and analysis of specific time points on Day 1 (2, 6, 12, 24 hours) to explore early postoperative pain dynamics. (2) Categorical analysis of NRS scores classified into five pain severity levels: no, mild, moderate, severe, and unbearable pain. Group comparisons were conducted using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical distributions.
2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Analgesic Intake (Acetaminophen 1000 mg)
2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) Using OHIP-14
Baseline, 1 week post-implant placement, and 1 week post-prosthesis placement
Study Arms (3)
650 nm PBM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received photobiomodulation therapy using a 650 nm red diode laser. The laser was applied at three points (buccal, palatal, and crestal) around the implant site at 100 mW for 60 seconds per point, delivering a total dose of 18 J. PBM was applied immediately after implant placement and repeated within 48 hours.
810 nm PBM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received photobiomodulation therapy using an 810 nm infrared diode laser. The laser was applied at three points (buccal, palatal, and crestal) around the implant site at 100 mW for 60 seconds per point, delivering a total dose of 18 J. PBM was applied immediately after implant placement and repeated within 48 hours.
Sham PBM
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in this arm received sham photobiomodulation therapy. The same laser handpiece was applied at the same points and durations as the active groups, but with the laser emission disabled. The procedure was designed to appear identical to active PBM treatment to maintain blinding. The sham was applied immediately after implant placement and repeated within 48 hours.
Interventions
A 650 nm red diode laser applied at three points (buccal, palatal, and crestal) around the implant site using 100 mW power for 60 seconds per point (total dose 18 J). Applied immediately post-op and repeated within 48 hours. Used for photobiomodulation to reduce pain and improve healing.
A 810 nm red diode laser applied at three points (buccal, palatal, and crestal) around the implant site using 100 mW power for 60 seconds per point (total dose 18 J). Applied immediately post-op and repeated within 48 hours. Used for photobiomodulation to reduce pain and improve healing.
Identical laser handpiece applied at the same locations and durations as the active PBM groups, but without laser emission. Used to maintain blinding and simulate treatment without therapeutic effect.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 20-65 years.
- Indicated for single dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla.
- ASA physical status I or II.
- Good oral health.
- Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up schedule.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of analgesics, NSAIDs, or corticosteroids within 48 hours prior to surgery.
- History of alcohol abuse or regular consumption of \>14 drinks/week (men) or \>7 drinks/week (women), or withdrawal within the last 6 months.
- History of chronic pain or long-term pain medication use.
- Need for grafting, sinus lift, or complex implant procedures.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunodeficiency).
- History of epilepsy, photosensitivity, or contraindications to laser therapy.
- Allergy or contraindication to acetaminophen.
- Previous implant or surgical treatment in the same site within the past 6 months.
- Heavy smokers (\>12 cigarettes/day) or individuals who quit smoking within the past 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences (NILES), Cairo University
Giza, Giza Governorate, 12613, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad M Abdussalam, BDS, MSc
National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences (NILES), Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The operator administering the laser therapy was not blinded due to the nature of the device used. Sham PBM was visually identical to active laser settings to maintain blinding for all other parties.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
August 17, 2023
Primary Completion
June 2, 2024
Study Completion
June 29, 2024
Last Updated
May 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be shared beginning 6 months following publication and will be available for up to 3 years upon reasonable request.
- Access Criteria
- * Data will be made available to qualified researchers for individual participant meta-analysis or academic research focused on dental implant outcomes and photobiomodulation. Requests should be submitted with a brief research proposal and data use agreement. Approved data will be shared electronically via email or a secure cloud-based system. * Mechanism of access: Requests should be sent to std.zein.adham@niles.edu.eg
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this article will be made available after de-identification, upon reasonable request and following institutional and ethical approvals. Supporting documents such as study protocol and statistical analysis plan may also be shared as needed.