NCT04593290

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate the association between listening effort and cognitive function for both cognitively healthy individuals and for patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in mid-to-late stages of life, and furthermore to investigate listening effort and cognitive function after several weeks of hearing aid use. Listening effort is measured by the recording of peak pupil dilation during a sentence-final word identification and recall (SWIR) test, cognitive performance is measured using a battery of pen and paper cognitive tests, and hearing loss is measured with pure tone audiometry (PTA). A select number of participants in both the cognitively healthy and MCI group will be administered hearing aids, and the study will re-test both listening effort and cognitive performance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 8, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 19, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Listening effort

    Listening effort will be measured by the percent of correctly recalled words in the SWIR test and the time-bound pattern in the pupil dilation traces during the SWIR test.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • The Stroop Color and Word test

    Neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect. Measure: time (seconds) and number of mistakes. Increased time corresponds to poorer performance. Increased mistakes correspond to poorer performance.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • Rey Complex Figure Test

    Neuropsychological assessment, administered by trained neuropsychologist, where examinees are asked to reproduce a complicated line drawing, first by copying it freehand and then drawing it from recall. This tests both recognition and recall, and uses visuospatial abilities, memory, attention, planning, working memory and executive functions. Measure: Accuracy scores between 0 and 2 on 18 figure elements (from 0 to a maximum of 36) on both copy and delayed recall Higher score = improved performance

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • Symbol-Digit Modalities Test

    Neuropsychological assessment commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess neurological dysfunction. The participant has 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Like other substitution tasks, performance is underpinned by attention, perceptual speed, motor speed, and visual scanning. Measure: Total score based on number of pairings made in 90 seconds ( maximum of 110 pairings). Higher score corresponds to improved performance.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • Trail Making Test A and B

    Neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. Test A has participants follow numbers sequentially, while Test B has participants follow alternating numbers and letters, sequentially. The test can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, as well as executive functioning. Measure: Test A - total time (seconds) required to connect 25 numbers, Test B - total time (seconds) required to connect 13 numbers and alphabet to letter H. Increased time corresponds to poorer performance.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • Verbal Fluency Test (category and lexical)

    Participants are given 1 minute to produce as many unique words as possible within a semantic category (category fluency) or starting with a given letter (letter fluency). Category fluency tasks rely on language representations of semantic concepts, whereas lexical and action word task rely more on the central executive component of working memory. Measure: Number of unique words identified within 1 minute. More words correspond to improved performance.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

  • Logical Memory Test A

    The Logical Memory test (part A) is a subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, and is a standardised assessment of narrative episodic memory. A short story is orally presented and the examinee is asked to recall the story verbatim. 25-35 minutes later, free recall of the story is again elicited (delayed recall), and a series of 30 questions are asked about the story. Measure: scores between 0 and 1 on specific pieces of the story (maximum score of 25) in both immediate and delayed recall. For the questions, a score of 0 or 1 is given to the corresponding 30 questions (maximum score of 30). Higher score corresponds to improved performance.

    Baseline, pre-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Listening effort post-hearing aid use

    Post-intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention (hearing aid use)

  • Logical Memory Test A post-hearing aid use

    Post-intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention (hearing aid use)

  • Verbal Fluency Test (category and lexical) post-hearing aid use

    Post-intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention (hearing aid use)

  • Trail Making Test A and B - post-hearing aid use

    Post-intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention (hearing aid use)

  • Symbol-Digit Modalities Test

    Post-intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention (hearing aid use)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

EXPERIMENTAL

MCI is defined as an early stage of cognitive decline that lies between normal age-matched cognitive function and the onset of very mild forms of dementia, and is associated with a slight but noticeable decline in abilities such as memory and thinking skills. Listening effort testing (with pupillometry) and cognitive testing will be administered for this group - and after a 6-week period of hearing aid use, these measures will be re-tested.

Device: Oticon Opn S 1 miniRITE hearing aid

Cognitively Healthy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group is 40-85 years old and has no significant neurological or psychiatric disease. Listening effort testing (with pupillometry) and cognitive testing will be administered for this group - and after a 6-week period of hearing aid use, these measures will be re-tested.

Device: Oticon Opn S 1 miniRITE hearing aid

Interventions

Everyone who participates in Part 1 (listening effort testing and cognitive testing) will be invited to participate in Part 2 (hearing aids). It is not a requirement to participate in the administration, 6-week use, and re-testing procedures involved in Part 2 of the study. All cognitively healthy participants will be invited to participate, only MCI patients with a live-in informant will be given this opportunity. After ear measurement and dome and wire length selection, Oticon Opn S 1 miniRITE hearing aid fitting will occur wirelessly using Genie software, followed by hearing aid use instructions. The fitting will use Open domes, the standard NAL-NL2 protocol, and will increase gain seven steps on top of Real Ear Unaided Gain (REUG) from 750 Hz to 6 kHz.

Cognitively HealthyMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Is 40-85 years old;
  • Has no other significant neurological or psychiatric disease;
  • Has normal hearing (0 - 25 dB thresholds from 250 -6 kHz) measured using PTA;
  • Has normal or corrected to normal vision;
  • Has an MCI diagnosis, according to Winblad criteria, with a score on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) less than or equal to 26 (MMSE ≤ 26);
  • Has a CDR = 0.5;
  • Speaks Danish as native language
  • (For part 2 of the study - hearing aid use) has a live-in informant.

You may not qualify if:

  • Takes medication or treatment that could impact the pupillary dilation: eye drops (e.g. atropine or phenylephrine);
  • Takes medication or treatment that could impact cognitive function;
  • Abuses alcohol or drugs;
  • Is unable to comply with study procedures.
  • Cognitively healthy group:
  • Is 40-85 years old;
  • Has a score above 26 on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (MMSE \> 26);
  • Has a CDR Global score = 0;
  • Has no significant neurological or psychiatric disease;
  • Has Normal hearing (0 - 25 dB thresholds from 250 -6 kHz) measured using PTA;
  • Has Normal or corrected to normal vision;
  • Speaks Danish as a native language.
  • Meets the criteria for MCI (Winblad criteria) or dementia (ICD 10);
  • Takes medication or treatment that could impact the pupillary dilation: eye drops (e.g. atropine or phenylephrine);
  • Takes medication or treatment that could impact cognitive function;
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Copenhagen Memory Clinic, Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, Region H, 2100, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, Edwards B, Hornsby BW, Humes LE, Lemke U, Lunner T, Matthen M, Mackersie CL, Naylor G, Phillips NA, Richter M, Rudner M, Sommers MS, Tremblay KL, Wingfield A. Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.

    PMID: 27355771BACKGROUND
  • Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.

    PMID: 21233711BACKGROUND
  • Dawes P, Emsley R, Cruickshanks KJ, Moore DR, Fortnum H, Edmondson-Jones M, McCormack A, Munro KJ. Hearing loss and cognition: the role of hearing AIDS, social isolation and depression. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0119616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119616. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25760329BACKGROUND
  • Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Logroscino G. Age-related hearing impairment-a risk factor and frailty marker for dementia and AD. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Mar;11(3):166-75. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.12. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

    PMID: 25686757BACKGROUND
  • Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimaki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32738937BACKGROUND
  • Griffiths TD, Lad M, Kumar S, Holmes E, McMurray B, Maguire EA, Billig AJ, Sedley W. How Can Hearing Loss Cause Dementia? Neuron. 2020 Nov 11;108(3):401-412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

    PMID: 32871106BACKGROUND
  • Feldman A, Patou F, Baumann M, Stockmarr A, Waldemar G, Maier AM, Vogel A. Listen Carefully protocol: an exploratory case-control study of the association between listening effort and cognitive function. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e051109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051109.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive DysfunctionHearing Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Anja Maier, Ph.D.

    DTU - Technical University of Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Deputy Head of Division, Group Leader

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2020

First Posted

October 19, 2020

Study Start

August 8, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations