NCT06954194

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of explicit vs. implicit intervention on subject relative clause production in Cantonese-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). It will also learn about individual difference predictors of intervention outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Undergo diagnostic assessments of DLD to confirm their DLD status.
  • Complete pre-intervention assessments to assess their procedural learning and working memory capacities.
  • Undergo the intervention phase, which consists of a pretest, 10 intervention sessions, three posttests (after the 1st, 5th and 10th intervention), and a retention test (1 month after the last intervention).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 10, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 4, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

April 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Randomized Controlled TrialExplicit interventionImplicit interventionProcedural circuit Deficit HypothesisIndividual differenceRelative clauseSyntactic primingShape coding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Production accuracy

    Production accuracy of the target structure

    From pretest to the retention test (1 month after all 10 intervention sessions are completed)

  • Number of successful learners

    The number of successful learners (≥80% accuracy)

    From pretest to the retention test (1 month after all 10 intervention sessions are completed)

Study Arms (2)

Explicit intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will receive explicit teaching of the target structure using the Shape Coding scheme adapted to be age- and language (Cantonese)-appropriate, followed by syntactic priming sessions.

Behavioral: Explicit intervention (Shape Coding+syntactic priming)

Implicit intervention group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm will receive identical syntactic priming sessions to the explicit intervention group, but without explicit teaching of the target structure using the Shape Coding scheme.

Behavioral: Implicit intervention (syntactic priming only)

Interventions

For explicit intervention, a syntactic priming task will be preceded by explicit teaching of the target structure using the Shape Coding scheme adapted to be age- and language (Cantonese)-appropriate. A different set of 10 sentences will be used for teaching in each explicit intervention session, with five sentences used as exemplars for the experimenter to explain the target structure, and the remaining five sentences for children to practice. The syntactic priming session will be presented as a game to sustain the children's interest and to disguise the purpose of the study. Each intervention session will contain 40 pairs of prime-target pictures, 40 pairs of control-target pictures, and 20 pairs of filler pictures, randomly presented to the experimenter and child and controlled by the experimenter. In total, there are 500 doses of SRC-O sentences (50 sentences x10 sessions).

Explicit intervention group

For implicit intervention, the same 10 sessions of syntactic priming will be provided to the children without explicit instruction of the SRC-O structure using the Shape Coding System. Nonetheless, to make the exposure and dosage as comparable as possible between the two groups, children in the implicit intervention group will also receive 10 listening sessions before the syntactic priming sessions. During the listening sessions, the same sets of sentences used in the explicit instruction sessions will be presented and the children will be instructed to listen closely as the tutor reads aloud the SRC-O sentence. Each listening session will be followed by a syntactic priming session that is identical to that of the explicit intervention group. In total, there are also 500 doses of SRC-O sentences (50 sentences x10 sessions).

Implicit intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 8 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • being Cantonese dominant who learned Cantonese as their first language and attending Cantonese-medium primary schools.
  • having normal IQ and no hearing impairment.
  • scoring at least -1.25 SD below the mean in any two subtests of the Hong Kong Cantonese Oral Language Assessment Scale (a standardized language assessment tool for Hong Kong Cantonese-speaking children).

You may not qualify if:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Speech and Language Sciences Laboratory (SLS Lab)

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Language Development Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Language DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Caicai Zhang, PhD

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2025

First Posted

May 1, 2025

Study Start

February 10, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations