Improving Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer After Surgery With Intensified Follow-up & Surveillance
iRECOVER
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to gain further insights into the treatment of patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) symptoms after rectal resection. The main question is: Can LARS symptoms and quality of life be improved by implementing an intensified follow-up program? Researchers will compare the results of the intervention group with the results of a control group in which patients do not receive an intensified follow-up program to determine whether the intervention works. Participants will undergo an intensified follow-up program which consists of several follow-up visits and medical treatment, pelvic floor muscle training and gynaecological and urological co-treatment in case of LARS symptoms and urinary or sexual complaints.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2028
May 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.4 years
March 24, 2025
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of the LARS score after 13 months
The primary outcome is the change of the LARS score after participation for 13 months in an intensified follow-up program compared to standard treatment which means patients are only treated if they present themselves in our consultation hours due to complaints. The LARS score is recorded using the LARS score questionnaire, developed 2012 by Emmertson et al.. The LARS score consists of five questions on the topics incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stools, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools and urgency. Each answer results in a number of points, those points are summarized in the end to give a total score. This score is categorized into a range of no LARS (score 21 and lower), minor LARS (score 21 - 29) and major LARS (score 30 - 42).
13 months after closure of ileostomy
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Patients' quality of life (QoL)
1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Urinary symptoms in women and men
1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Sexual function in women
1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Sexual function in men
1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Readmission to hospital
13 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntensified follow-up program consisting of of several follow-up visits at 1, 4, 7 and 13 months and medical treatment, pelvic floor muscle training and gynaecological and urological co-treatment in case of LARS symptoms and urinary or sexual complaints which will be recorded using questionnaires.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment according to standard guidelines, recording of symptoms using questionnaires at 1 and 13 months.
Interventions
The study intervention will be an intensified follow-up program which consists of different measures. Patients will attend follow-up visits 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after ileostomy repositioning, at which LARS symptoms, quality of life as well as sexual and urinary function will be recorded using various questionnaires. In case of LARS symptoms patients will receive medical treatment with loperamide and metamucil as well as pelvic floor muscle training (including biofeedback and home exercises). Regarding pelvic floor muscle training we are planning nine sessions instructed by physiotherapy staff. In case of therapy-resistant LARS symptoms after 6 months sacral neurostimulation is offered to the patients with a focus on incontinence symptoms and desire for surgery or transanal irrigation in patients with a focus on voiding disorders. In case of urinary and sexual complaints patients are referred to our urology or gynaecology department for further diagnostic and treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients older than 18 years
- patients with rectal cancer in the middle and lower third of the rectum in stages I to IV who underwent LAR with TME and protective ileostomy
- able to give informed consent as documented by signature
You may not qualify if:
- dementia or other psychiatric disorder that would prevent the patients from answering the questionnaires and experiencing sustainable training effects
- impossibility of stoma reversal due to persistent anastomotic leak and/or local recurrence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerlandlead
- St. Claraspital AGcollaborator
- Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Baselcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Clarunis Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
Basel, 4002, Switzerland
Lindenhofspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland
St. Anna Spital Bern
Bern, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Luzern
Lucerne, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, Switzerland
Related Publications (3)
Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21.
PMID: 22504191BACKGROUNDRoberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Jacobson DJ, Reilly WT, Talley NJ, Lieber MM. Natural history of prostatism: high American Urological Association Symptom scores among community-dwelling men and women with urinary incontinence. Urology. 1998 Feb;51(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00505-0.
PMID: 9495700BACKGROUNDRosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):319-26. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472.
PMID: 10637462BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Daniel Steinemann, Deputy chief physician
Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2025
First Posted
April 20, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04