Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of T3 Rectal Cancer
A Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomised Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (NARCT) and Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in Patients With T3 (a/b/c) Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The gold standard treatment for locally advanced, non-metastatic rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The primary goal of treatment is to achieve local disease control, reduce tumour volume and minimise the risk of distant metastases. While this multimodal treatment approach has offered improvements in local control and sphincter preservation, it has had little effect on distant recurrence and overall survival. We aim to compare NACRT and TME using the following endpoints: Primary --\>To compare the effects neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for T3 rectal cancer on overall survival. Secondary --\> To compare the effects neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NARCT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for cT3 rectal cancer on clinical outcomes:
- Clinical complete response (cCR)
- Pathological complete response (pCR)
- Disease-free survival (DFS)
- Organ preservation
- Overall morbidity / mortality
- Treatment-related morbidity / mortality
- Peri-operative outcomes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2030
ExpectedOctober 25, 2023
October 1, 2023
1 year
October 18, 2023
October 24, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Alive
Five years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical complete response
6 months
Pathological complete response
6 months
Disease-free survival
5 years
Progression-free survival
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe NARCT regimen is prescribed specifically as standard 5-FU over several weeks. The CRT regimen consists of the standard algorithms: a total of 5400-5600 cGy of radiation (4500 cGy to the pelvis, with an integrated boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes of 500 cGy followed by an option boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes) delivered in 27-28 fractions, respectively, of 180-200 cGy each over a 5-6 week period.
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSequence of TNT regimen can be classified as induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (radiation first) treatment. All patients received the same chemotherapy (FOLFOX) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery. However timing of TNT can differ depending on concerns of local and distal failure.
Interventions
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide. The CRT regimen consists of the standard algorithms: a total of 5400-5600 cGy of radiation (4500 cGy to the pelvis, with an integrated boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes of 500 cGy followed by an option boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes) delivered in 27-28 fractions, respectively, of 180-200 cGy each over a 5-6 week period.
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide. Oxaliplatin is an organoplatinum complex in which the platinum atom is complexed with 1,2- diaminocyclohexane with an oxalate ligand as a leaving group. Platinum content is 48.1% to 50.1%. All patients received the same chemotherapy (FOLFOX) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who meet any of the following criteria at the time of screening will be excluded from study registration:
- Received prior chemotherapy for local or metastatic disease.
- Locally advanced rectal cancer; \>T3, Nodal disease
- Primary unresectable rectal cancer. A tumour is considered unresectable when invading adjacent organs and an en bloc resection will not achieve negative margins.
- Received prior pelvic radiotherapy.
- Patients unable to undergo MRI.
- Previous or concurrent active malignancy ≤ 5 years prior to registration with the exception of non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of any type, or other cancers that the treating Investigator does not feel will impact the study objectives.
- Screening electrocardiogram (ECG) with evidence of:
- QT prolongation (QTc \> 450ms in males and \> 470ms in females)
- Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, complete left bundle branch block, high atrioventricular AV block (e.g. bi-vascular block , Mobitz type II and third degree AV block
- Other severe cardiac dysfunction
- (ECG must be assessed for all patients within 14 days prior to registration).
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including:
- Cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to registration
- Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to registration
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
PMID: 15496622BACKGROUNDKong JC, Soucisse M, Michael M, Tie J, Ngan SY, Leong T, McCormick J, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7476-7486. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09837-8. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
PMID: 33891203BACKGROUNDFeeney G, Sehgal R, Sheehan M, Hogan A, Regan M, Joyce M, Kerin M. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 7;25(33):4850-4869. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4850.
PMID: 31543678BACKGROUNDHoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4319-4336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
PMID: 32524461BACKGROUNDLorimer PD, Motz BM, Kirks RC, Boselli DM, Walsh KK, Prabhu RS, Hill JS, Salo JC. Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2095-2103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5873-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
PMID: 28534080BACKGROUNDLi Y, Wang J, Ma X, Tan L, Yan Y, Xue C, Hui B, Liu R, Ma H, Ren J. A Review of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 17;12(8):1022-31. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.15438. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27489505BACKGROUNDBujko K, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, Malinowska M, Pietrzak L, Krynski J, Michalski W, Oledzki J, Kusnierz J, Zajac L, Bednarczyk M, Szczepkowski M, Tarnowski W, Kosakowska E, Zwolinski J, Winiarek M, Wisniowska K, Partycki M, Beczkowska K, Polkowski W, Stylinski R, Wierzbicki R, Bury P, Jankiewicz M, Paprota K, Lewicka M, Cisel B, Skorzewska M, Mielko J, Bebenek M, Maciejczyk A, Kapturkiewicz B, Dybko A, Hajac L, Wojnar A, Lesniak T, Zygulska J, Jantner D, Chudyba E, Zegarski W, Las-Jankowska M, Jankowski M, Kolodziejski L, Radkowski A, Zelazowska-Omiotek U, Czeremszynska B, Kepka L, Kolb-Sielecki J, Toczko Z, Fedorowicz Z, Dziki A, Danek A, Nawrocki G, Sopylo R, Markiewicz W, Kedzierawski P, Wydmanski J; Polish Colorectal Study Group. Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 x 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):834-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw062. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
PMID: 26884592BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Colorectal Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2023
First Posted
October 24, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2030
Last Updated
October 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10