Effect of Professional Prophylaxis on Clinical Parameters and Patient Comfort: Randomized Slipt-Mouth Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) protocol can improve or maintain oral health and whether it provides more comfort to patients compared to a conventional protocol. The study involved 25 adult patients aged 18 years or older, healthy, unmedicated, with more than 20 natural teeth, and no periodontitis. Main Questions it Aims to Answer:
- Does the GBT protocol improve or maintain oral health compared to a conventional protocol?
- Is the GBT protocol more comfortable for patients than the conventional protocol? Comparison Group: Researchers compared the conventional protocol (used in quadrants I and III for Group A, and in quadrants II and IV for Group B) to the test GBT protocol (used in the opposite quadrants) to see if the GBT protocol results in improved clinical outcomes and better patient comfort. Participants Will:
- Undergo two different protocols for oral prophylaxis (GBT and conventional protocols) on separate quadrants of their mouth.
- Have their clinical parameters assessed at three time points: baseline (T0), one week (T1), and three weeks (T2) after the intervention.
- Rate the comfort of the intervention using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a Likert scale from 0 to 10 for each quadrant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 17, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedApril 24, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 month
November 30, 2024
April 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
GBI
Ainamo \& Bay gingival bleeding index
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
PCR
4 weeks
PI
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Test
EXPERIMENTALGBT Protocol
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORScalling and polishing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy, unmedicated, without periodontitis, and with more than 20 natural teeth
You may not qualify if:
- dental implants, with periodontal pockets equal to or greater than 4, with fixed orthodontic appliances, with special needs, with some medical pathology, taking antibiotics 3 months before the study, smokers, with known hypersensitivity to erythritol and patients who did not complete the follow-up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Lisbonlead
- E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Lisbon
Lisbon, Portugal
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2024
First Posted
April 20, 2025
Study Start
March 17, 2022
Primary Completion
April 29, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share