NCT06935656

Brief Summary

Executive functions (EF) are a set of effortful cognitive processes that allow children to control their thoughts, emotions, behaviors, update information in their memory and be mentally flexible. The literature shows that the development of EF is essential for school success, in addition to being an important predictor of quality of life in adulthood. As a result, numerous interventions have sought to stimulate EF development through different programs and formats, typically reporting moderate effectiveness in improving core EF components. However, evidence for effects on untrained, domain-specific areas, such as academic performance, is less consistent. One explanation for these mixed findings may lie in the heterogeneity of interventions and participant characteristics; particularly regarding the modality of the intervention (e.g., using digital media versus traditional media) and children's stage of development. Although the current literature suggests these factors moderate intervention efficacy, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials that compare these variables within a single design. To address this gap, a randomized controlled study has been proposed, aimed at examining an EF intervention delivered in one of three modalities-traditional (paper-and-pencil), digital (computer-based), and mixed-in low-income, urban Chilean school children at two developmental stages (5-6 years and 9-10 years). Each program will target core EF components and measure both efficacy in EF improvement and outcomes in literacy and math skills. By contrasting these intervention modalities across distinct age groups, this study seeks to identify whether developmental level and format have moderating effects on EF improvement and academic performance. Our findings will contribute to ongoing debates about the best practices for EF stimulation, potentially informing evidence-based interventions that can be scaled or adapted for children at different developmental stages and in under-resourced settings. In doing so, this research seeks to clarify how, when, and for whom EF interventions yield lasting benefits beyond immediate cognitive skills.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
192

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 26, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Executive functionsinterventionacademic performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from baseline in working memory

    Working memory will be measured using a direct task known as the Corsi Block Test. The test has an internal consistency of 0.93 (95% confidence interval of 0.84 - 0.97) in children ages 10-11 years. Participants will see nine blocks on a screen. The participant will be instructed to watch a sequence of blocks that illuminate. The participant will need to replicate the sequence by touching the blocks on the screen. Sequences begin simple (2 blocks) and become more difficult throughout the trials (up to 9 blocks). A score is determined by the number of errors and the number of correct responses. A higher score indicates better working memory.

    From baseline to end of intervention at 12 weeks

  • Change from baseline in inhibitory control

    To measure inhibitory control, the Hearts and Flowers task will be used. Participants will watch a stimulus of either a heart or a flower in the center of a screen. In the congruent trials, participants will respond with the same stimulus by touching either the smaller heart or flower to the left or right (respectively) of the main stimulus on screen. In the incongruent trials, the opposite of the stimulus must be touched. Reaction time and accuracy are both collected from each trial. Lower reaction time and more accurate responses indicate better inhibitory control. This task was adapted in Chile and had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 in children aged 6 to 10 years.

    From baseline to end of intervention at 12 weeks

  • Change from baseline in cognitive flexibility

    Cognitive flexibility will be measured using a modified version of the Dimensional Change Card Sort. This task requires participants to group images on cards first using two dimensions: shape in the first set of trials, then color in the second set. Next, in the third set of trials, participants are asked to group images on cards based on three dimensions: shape, color, or quantity. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded from each trial. Lower reaction time and better accuracy indicate better cognitive flexibility. This instrument has not been validated in Chile but has a reliability coefficient of 0.92 in children aged 6-15 years.

    From baseline to end of intervention at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline in literacy

    From baseline to end of intervention at 12 weeks

  • Change from baseline in math ability

    From baseline to end of intervention at 12 weeks

Study Arms (4)

5-6 year old group

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm is made up of the younger group of participants (aged 5-6 years old) who will be randomly assigned to one of the three interventions.

Other: Tablet-based executive function interventionOther: Traditional executive function interventionOther: Mixed executive function intervention

9-10 year old group

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm is made up of the older group of participants (aged 9-10 years old) who will be randomly assigned to one of the three interventions.

Other: Tablet-based executive function interventionOther: Traditional executive function interventionOther: Mixed executive function intervention

5-6 year old TAU group

NO INTERVENTION

This arm is made up of the younger group of participants (aged 5-6 years old) who will be randomly assigned to no intervention, and will receive their normal schooling.

9-10 year old TAU group

NO INTERVENTION

This arm is made up of the older group of participants (aged 9-10 years old) who will be randomly assigned to no intervention, and will receive their normal schooling.

Interventions

This intervention contains activities that have been designed to stimulate the development of children's executive functioning (working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility). Each activity is presented in a gamified environment, and each executive function is stimulated for an equal amount of time through activities that children complete on a tablet.

5-6 year old group9-10 year old group

This intervention contains activities that have been designed to stimulate the development of children's executive functioning (working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility). Each activity is presented as a game, and each executive function is stimulated for an equal amount of time through activities that require motor skills, the manipulation of cards and the use of paper and pencil tasks.

5-6 year old group9-10 year old group

This intervention contains activities that have been designed to stimulate the development of children's executive functioning (working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility). Each activity is presented as a game, and each executive function is stimulated for an equal amount of time. Half of the intervention sessions utilize activities that require motor skills, the manipulation of cards and the use of paper and pencil tasks, and the other half are activities that are completed on a tablet.

5-6 year old group9-10 year old group

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 10 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Schools must be classified by the Chilean government as being public elementary schools located in an urban setting, with a proportion of vulnerability of at least 70% or greater (index for socioeconomic status). Schools also must contain at least one kindergarten class.
  • For participants, the children must be regularly attending either kindergarten, or the fourth or fifth grade.

You may not qualify if:

  • Schools that are considered rural, private or subsidized are not eligible. Additionally, schools that have a vulnerability index of less than 70% are not eligible.
  • For participants, children with an intellectual disability, or are unable to understand and speak Spanish, will be excluded from the data analysis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Municipal School 2

Talca, Maule Region, 07762, Chile

Location

Municipal School 4

Talca, Maule Region, 07762, Chile

Location

Municipal School 5

Talca, Maule Region, 07762, Chile

Location

Municipal School 1

Talca, Maule Region, Chile

Location

Municipal School 3

Talca, Maule Region, Chile

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Napolitano N, Rojas-Barahona CA, Gaete J, Araya R. A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol. BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 4;13(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03075-3.

Related Links

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: This cluster-randomized, between-subjects factorial study examines two independent variables: (1) intervention modality (digital, traditional, mixed, and control) and (2) age group (5-6, 9-10 years), forming a 4 × 2 design with eight groups. Four schools will be randomly assigned to one modality. All follow the same state curriculum and serve demographically similar urban children, ensuring baseline comparability. Within each school, both age groups will participate, allowing analysis of main and interaction effects. The intervention delivers the same EF program via digital, traditional, or mixed formats, while the control group receives no specialized EF training. Executive functions, literacy, and math will be measured pre- and post-intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Posted

April 20, 2025

Study Start

May 5, 2025

Primary Completion

November 26, 2025

Study Completion

December 18, 2025

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study will follow open science guidelines in that the anonymized data and the R analysis script will be made available on the OSF registry of this study. Parents and guardians will be informed of this process in the informed consent form.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The protocol, SAP and ICF are currently available on the OSF study registry (start date: March 11, 2025). Analytic code will be when the statistical analyses are complete (estimated date: June, 2026). This data will be available for five years, as per guidelines set by the University of Talca's Scientific Ethics Commitee.
Access Criteria
Anyone with the provided link will be able to access this information.
More information

Available IPD Datasets

All of the information regarding the Consent forms, IRB certificate as well as the analytic code and data can be found here. (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y4SGJ)Access
Study Protocol Access

Locations