Effects of Modern Board Games on Well Being in Older Adults

NCT06306365 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: PI-DOC003-WBOA
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 35
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to assess the effects of an intervention using modern board game-based learning in a sample of older individuals. The evaluation will focus on determining if there is a change in executive functions, social participation, and participants' perception of well-being.

Conditions

Executive Functions

Keywords

Modern board game; Executive functions; Social participation; Well-being; Older people

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly

  The cognitive subscale "CAMCONG" is used, Section B of the CAMDEX-R (Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly, adapted to Spanish by López-Pousa (2015)). It consists of 60 items (neuropsychological areas). The maximum score is 105 points in this revised option. In the scale validated by López-Pousa and others (1990), the cutoff point that best discriminated between a subject with dementia and one without dementia was 69/70. The scores for the different cognitive functions: orientation (minimun score 0, máximum score 10), language (minimun score 0, maximum score 30), memory (minimum score 0, maximum score 27), attention/calculation (minimum score 0, maximum score 9), praxis (minimun score 0, máximum score 12), abstract thinking (minimum score 0, maximum score 8), perception (mínimum score 0, máximum score 9). Minimum score: 0, total maximum score: 105. Executive function (maximum score is 28). A higher score indicates a better state of executive functions.

  0 weeks,12 weeks

• Trail Making Test to evaluate Executive Functions

  As a complement to assess executive functions, the TESEN (Trail Making Test to evaluate Executive Functions) is used, by Portellano Pérez and Martínez Arias (2014). It consists of four subtests (trails) where the evaluated person initiates increasingly complex cognitive processes and demands that measure functions such as working memory, prospective memory, motor processing speed, perceptual speed, inhibition, sustained attention, and alternating attention. The TESEN provides three different scores for each trail, which are: execution score (E=hits-errors/time), speed score (V=time in seconds), and accuracy score (P=hits-errors/hits). In the quick correction mode, these values can be converted into decatips, a scale from 1 to 10, where the highest level indicates better development of executive functions.

  0 weeks,12 weeks

• Assessment of quality of life in older adults and people with disabilities

  The FUMAT scale (Gómez, Verdugo, Arias, and Navas, 2008) is an assessment instrument composed of 8 subscales that make up Quality of Life. In this study, the dimensions corresponding to will be used: emotional well-being (8 items, minimun score 8, maximum score 32); interpersonal relationships (6 items, minimun score 6, maximum score 24); personal development (8 items, minimum score 8, maximum score 32); social inclusión (9 items, minimun score 9, maximum score 36).

  0 weeks,12 weeks

• Psychometric development and practical use

  The Volitional Questionnaire (VQ) by De las Heras, Geist, and Kielhofner (1998) consists of 14 items with a four-level scale, covering the continuum from spontaneous (highest level) to passive (lowest level). The total score of the questionnaire is 56 points and is divided into three scales (exploration, competence, and achievement). A higher score indicates higher levels of volition. Below is indicated the subscale, the number of ítems, the mínimum score and the máximum sore: exploration (5 items, mínimum score 5, maximum score 20), competence (5 items, mínimum score 5, maximum score 20), achievement (4 items, mínimum score 4, maximum score 15).

  0 weeks,12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Experimental

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects belonging to this group perform a modern board game-based learning.

Behavioral: Modern board game-based learning

Control (no intervention)

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects belonging to this group not perform intervention.

Interventions

Modern board game-based learning BEHAVIORAL

Modern board game-based learning involves using contemporary board games as educational tools. It emphasizes active participation, critical thinking, and social interaction among participants. By integrating strategic thinking and problem-solving within a game context, this approach aims to enhance learning experiences in an engaging and enjoyable manner. In this study, board games have been selected to target and engage executive functions.

Experimental

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 65 Years - 120 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Be residents of the Centro Doctor Villacián (Valladolid).
• Willing to commit to the study.
• Have literacy skills.

You may not qualify if:

• · Presentation of advanced dementia case.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• European University Miguel de Cervantes: lead
• Centro Doctor Villacián, Valladolid, Spain: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

European University Miguel of Cervante

Valladolid, 47012, Spain

Location

Related Publications (7)

• Ching-Teng Y. Effect of board game activities on cognitive function improvement among older adults in adult day care centers. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Oct;58(9):825-838. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1656143. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

  PMID: 31432758 BACKGROUND

• Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, Hall CB, Derby CA, Kuslansky G, Ambrose AF, Sliwinski M, Buschke H. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2508-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022252.

  PMID: 12815136 BACKGROUND

• Estrada-Plana V, Montanera R, Ibarz-Estruga A, March-Llanes J, Vita-Barrull N, Guzman N, Ros-Morente A, Ayesa Arriola R, Moya-Higueras J. Cognitive training with modern board and card games in healthy older adults: two randomized controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;36(6):839-850. doi: 10.1002/gps.5484. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

  PMID: 33275804 BACKGROUND

• Dartigues JF, Foubert-Samier A, Le Goff M, Viltard M, Amieva H, Orgogozo JM, Barberger-Gateau P, Helmer C. Playing board games, cognitive decline and dementia: a French population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 29;3(8):e002998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002998.

  PMID: 23988362 BACKGROUND

• Gates NJ, Vernooij RW, Di Nisio M, Karim S, March E, Martinez G, Rutjes AW. Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 13;3(3):CD012279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012279.pub2.

  PMID: 30864747 BACKGROUND

• Lee BO, Yao CT, Pan CF. Effectiveness of board game activities for reducing depression among older adults in adult day care centers of Taiwan: a quasi-experimental study. Soc Work Health Care. 2020 Oct-Dec;59(9-10):725-737. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2020.1842576. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

  PMID: 33138738 BACKGROUND

• Nakao M. Special series on "effects of board games on health education and promotion" board games as a promising tool for health promotion: a review of recent literature. Biopsychosoc Med. 2019 Feb 19;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s13030-019-0146-3. eCollection 2019.

  PMID: 30820242 BACKGROUND

Related Links

• Developing serious games to promote cognitive abilities for the elderly. In 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
• Envejecimiento activo: un cambio de paradigma sobre el envejecimiento y la vejez. Aula abierta, 47(1), 45-54.
• Related Info

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Masking Details: No masking.
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: A quasi-experimental methodology will be employed, involving both a control group and an experimental group. Randomized control trial.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 22, 2024
• First Posted: March 12, 2024
• Study Start: February 7, 2024
• Primary Completion: June 28, 2024
• Study Completion: June 28, 2024
• Last Updated: October 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

ES (1)