Pain Relief Comparison: Pericapsular Nerve Group Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Positioning in Femur Fracture Surgery
Comparative Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block During Positioning of Patients With Proximal Femur Fractures for Spinal Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for pain relief During patient Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in proximal femur fracture surgeries. A total of 42 patients enrolled and randomly assigned to either the PENG or QLB group (n=21 each). pain relief will be assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during movement before and after the block, as well as the time of first rescue analgesia and total analgesic consumption. the study will also evaluate the ease of spinal positioning and anesthesiologist satisfaction. patient will be monitored intraoperatively and postoperatively for pain scores. adverse events, and analgesic requirement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2026
CompletedFebruary 10, 2026
February 1, 2026
6 months
March 6, 2025
February 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
difference in dynamic visual analog scale (VAS - D) scores at 30 minutes post. - block
comparison of median reduction in VAS - D scores ( during 15 - degree limb elevation ) between ultrasound - guided pericapsular nerve group block and quadratus lumborum block at 30 minutes after block administration. scale: VAS ( 0 - 10 cm; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain )
baseline ( pre - block ) to 30 minutes post block.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
ease of spinal positioning score (EOSP)
immediately before spinal anesthesia ( 30 minutes post - block )
operator satisfaction score
immediately after spinal anesthesia placement.
postoperative pain score
first 24 hours post - surgery
time of first rescue analgesia
up to 24 hours post - block
total rescue analgesia consumption
first 24 hours post - surgery
Study Arms (2)
Pericapsular nervegroup block
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe regional block will be performed with the patient in the supine position. Ultrasound machine with low frequency curvilinear probe (2-5MHz) covered with sterile sheath will be initially placed in a transverse plane over the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine (AIIS) and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counter-clockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the Iliopectineal Eminence (IPE), the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle will be observed. A 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be inserted from lateral to medial to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anaesthetic solution (30ml of bupivacaine 0.25%) will be injected in 5-mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane, without exceeding the toxic dose (3 mg/kg)
Quadratus lumborum block
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe block will be performed with the patient in the supine position. Under ultrasound guidance with a low frequency curvilinear probe (2-5MHz) covered with sterile sheath, the prob will be placed in coronal plane at midaxillary line between subcostal margin and iliac crest. A 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be inserted distal to subcostal margin and advanced under curvilinear probe. The needle will be advanced through external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles. Visualizing the tip penetrating the posterior epimysium of QLM and entering anterior thoracolumbar fascia (ATLF). A small volume of local anaesthetic will be injected after locating the needle tip and a negative aspiration for blood. After the distribution of the local anesthetic will be seen, the rest of the 30 mL of 0.25 % of bupivacaine will be injected
Interventions
A single shot pericapsular nerve group block preformed under ultrasound guidance with a local anesthetic agent ( Marcaine )
A single shot Quadratus lumborum block preformed under ultrasound guidance with a local anesthetic agent ( Marcaine )
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aging \> 21 years of both sexes.
- Patients scheduled for fixation of proximal femur fracture under spinal anesthesia.
- ASA Physical Status Class I, II or ш.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal to participate.
- Patients receiving opioids for chronic analgesic therapy.
- in ability to comprehend the visual analog scale.
- Coagulopathy ( INR \> 1.4, platelets \< 80000/mm3, or bleeding disorder).
- Infection at the injection site.
- Allergy to local anesthetics.
- Polytroma patients ( e.g., concurrent major thoracic/ abdominal injuries)
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease (e.g., low fixed cardiac output, NYHA class 3/4).
- Neurological disease (e.g., peripheral neuropathy, multiple sclerosis).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams university
Cairo, Abassya, 00202, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2025
First Posted
April 9, 2025
Study Start
April 10, 2025
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
January 10, 2026
Last Updated
February 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02