Comparative Outcomes of Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release with Neurotrophic Supplementation in Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
observational
497
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study addresses the pressing clinical question of optimizing surgical and pharmacological interventions for severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), a prevalent and debilitating condition caused by median nerve compression. Previous research has established the efficacy of Open Carpal Tunnel Release (OCTR) and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (ECTR); however, the role of neurotrophic supplementation in enhancing surgical outcomes has yet to be fully elucidated. Using a prospective clinical approach involving 497 patients, we evaluated the comparative outcomes of ECTR and OCTR with or without neurotrophic supplementation. Key findings demonstrate that ECTR, particularly when combined with neurotrophic agents, facilitates faster recovery and greater improvements in Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity (VCS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, with reduced complication rates compared to OCTR
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.8 years
February 25, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
SCV evaluation
SCV will be evaluated through electomyography after ECTR or OCTR with or without neurotrophic supplementation
12 months of follow-up
VAS for pain evaluation
VAS for pain will be evaluated through questionnarie after ECTR or OCTR with or without neurotrophic supplementation
12 months of follow-up
VAS for funcionality evaluation
VAS for functionality will be evaluated through questionnarie after ECTR or OCTR with or without neurotrophic supplementation
12 months of follow-up
Study Arms (4)
Open Carpal Tunnel Release without Neurotrophic
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release without Neurotrophic
Open Carpal Tunnel Release with Neurotrophic
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release with Neurotrophic
Interventions
Release of carpal tunnel with endoscopic device
Release of carpal tunnel with open tecnique
Neurotrophic supplementation after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
patients diagnosed with severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from Policlinico of Bari
You may qualify if:
- clinically and electromyographically confirmed severe CTS (SCV \< 35 m/s)
- experienced persistent symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatments for at least six months
You may not qualify if:
- mild or moderate CTS
- concomitant neuropathies
- previous carpal tunnel surgeries
- contraindications to neurotrophic supplementation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Policlinico di Bari
Bari, Italy, Italy
Related Publications (15)
Desideri I, Francolini G, Becherini C, Terziani F, Delli Paoli C, Olmetto E, Loi M, Perna M, Meattini I, Scotti V, Greto D, Bonomo P, Sulprizio S, Livi L. Use of an alpha lipoic, methylsulfonylmethane and bromelain dietary supplement (Opera(R)) for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy management, a prospective study. Med Oncol. 2017 Mar;34(3):46. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-0907-4. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28205185BACKGROUNDNikbakht S, Vafaei MA, Ashraf A, Nasiri A, Nikpay-Hosseinabad N. Assessment of L-carnitine effectiveness on carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr J Neurol. 2022 Jul 6;21(3):162-169. doi: 10.18502/cjn.v21i3.11109.
PMID: 38011355BACKGROUNDSalehi B, Berkay Yilmaz Y, Antika G, Boyunegmez Tumer T, Fawzi Mahomoodally M, Lobine D, Akram M, Riaz M, Capanoglu E, Sharopov F, Martins N, Cho WC, Sharifi-Rad J. Insights on the Use of alpha-Lipoic Acid for Therapeutic Purposes. Biomolecules. 2019 Aug 9;9(8):356. doi: 10.3390/biom9080356.
PMID: 31405030BACKGROUNDKim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, Jeon IH. Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):253-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.253. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
PMID: 25177448BACKGROUNDOrhurhu V, Orman S, Peck J, Urits I, Orhurhu MS, Jones MR, Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Odonkor C, Hirji S, Cornett EM, Imani F, Varrassi G, Viswanath O. Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery- A Systematic Review of Open and Endoscopic Approaches. Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec 26;10(6):e112291. doi: 10.5812/aapm.112291. eCollection 2020 Dec.
PMID: 34150584BACKGROUNDZieske L, Ebersole GC, Davidge K, Fox I, Mackinnon SE. Revision carpal tunnel surgery: a 10-year review of intraoperative findings and outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Aug;38(8):1530-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
PMID: 23809470BACKGROUNDSayegh ET, Strauch RJ. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):1120-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3835-z. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
PMID: 25135849BACKGROUNDSoltani AM, Allan BJ, Best MJ, Mir HS, Panthaki ZJ. A systematic review of the literature on the outcomes of treatment for recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):114-121. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290faba.
PMID: 23806914BACKGROUNDMeans KR Jr, Dubin NH, Patel KM, Pletka JD. Long-term outcomes following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Hand (N Y). 2014 Sep;9(3):384-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9614-1.
PMID: 25191172BACKGROUNDAtroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson GU, Ranstam J. Extended Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Open vs Endoscopic Release Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1399-401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12208. No abstract available.
PMID: 26441187BACKGROUNDMarvulli R, Ianieri G, De Venuto G, Falcicchio M, Gallo GA, Mennuni C, Gallone MF, Fiore P, Ranieri M, Megna M. Electrophysiological and Clinical Improvement in Non-Invasive Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21(2):345-351. doi: 10.2174/1871530320666200728152953.
PMID: 32723265BACKGROUNDStevens JC, Smith BE, Weaver AL, Bosch EP, Deen HG Jr, Wilkens JA. Symptoms of 100 patients with electromyographically verified carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1999 Oct;22(10):1448-56. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199910)22:103.0.co;2-y.
PMID: 10487914BACKGROUNDNordstrom DL, DeStefano F, Vierkant RA, Layde PM. Incidence of diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. Epidemiology. 1998 May;9(3):342-5.
PMID: 9583428BACKGROUNDMondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002 Jan 22;58(2):289-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.289.
PMID: 11805259BACKGROUNDSpahn G, Wollny J, Hartmann B, Schiele R, Hofmann GO. [Metaanalysis for the evaluation of risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) Part II. Occupational risk factors]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Oct;150(5):516-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315346. Epub 2012 Oct 17. German.
PMID: 23076750BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Rosella Elia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2025
First Posted
March 30, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share