Does Low-level Laser Therapy Protocol Affect the Efficacy of Treatment of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury After Maxillofacial Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dear Patient, Dear Parent / Guardian; This consent form has been prepared to enlighten you about the nature of the diagnosis and treatment methods that have been explained to you/patient and will be applied, the expected benefits of the procedures, possible side effects, alternative diagnosis and treatment options and their characteristics, and the consequences that may arise if these procedures are not performed and to obtain your consent. By reading and signing this form, you declare that you have been informed about the procedure and that you freely consent to the procedure. You can ask your doctor about the points you do not understand in the form. Please bring this form with you on the day of your appointment and hand it to your doctor. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW DIAGNOSIS AND PROCEDURE: Low-level laser therapy will be applied for the treatment of sensory impairment resulting from maxillofacial surgery. WHO WILL PERFORM YOUR PROCEDURE? This procedure will be performed by the physicians working in Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Dentistry, Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery. I also accept that KTU Faculty of Dentistry is an educational institution and that my treatment can be used to contribute to the education of interns and that they can participate in my operation. EXPECTED BENEFITS OF THE PROCEDURE To contribute to the nerve regeneration of the patient whose quality of life has deteriorated due to sensory damage. PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED IF THE PROCEDURE IS NOT PERFORMED There is no risk associated with low-level laser treatment. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROCEDURE, IF ANY: There is no alternative treatment. possible risks and complications of the procedure Treatment approaches to nerve injuries are divided into two as surgical and non-surgical treatment approaches. Surgical treatment approaches include decompression, resection of neuroma, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy, nerve grafts and intubation techniques. However, since there is a risk of complications after surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment approaches are primarily preferred. Non-surgical treatment approaches include pharmacological treatment, acupuncture, moxibustion and low-level laser (DSL) treatment. ESTIMATED DURATION OF THE PROCEDURE: 15-30 minutes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2025
CompletedMarch 25, 2025
March 1, 2025
4 years
February 8, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative clinical neurosensory testing (CNT), comprising three levels of evaluation. Level A: two-point discrimination, where the minimum distinguishable distance (15 mm, 10 mm, and 5 mm) was measured using slight skin pressure. Level B: light touch assessment, where a blunt-tipped tool was applied to 10 points on the lower lip, recording detected stimuli. Level C: pin-prick nociception, where forceps compression assessed pain perception at 10 points. A subjective neurosensory deficit assessment was conducted using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 100 mm horizontal line ranging from 0 (no sensation) to 100 (normal sensation), with descriptors at both ends.
up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Patients with different sessions, start time and cause of IAN injury were compared.
EXPERIMENTALLow level laser therapy was applied to all patients.
Interventions
In this study, which had more patients than other studies, different parameters were evaluated to determine the protocol of LLL therapy. These parameters were the cause of IAN injury, number of sessions, time of treatment start and period of follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with unilateral or bilateral inferior alveolar nerve damage caused by maxillofacial surgery and receiving DESL treatment
- Patients with a follow-up period of at least 6 months
- Patients whose diagnosis has been confirmed by clinical neurosensory testing
- Patients with complete study data and follow-up
- Patients who have not previously undergone any microsurgical or conservative treatment in the head and neck region due to nerve damage
- Patients without known neurological disease that may affect the study results
- Patients without active infection (pain, temperature increase, redness, edema, loss of function, etc.) or pathological findings (tumour, cyst, etc.) in the relevant area were included.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with nerve damage due to other reasons (pathology, infection, etc.) before maxillofacial surgery
- Patients with lingual nerve damage
- Patients with known neurological disease that may affect the study results
- Patients with missing data or patients who cannot be followed up
- Pregnant patients were not included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karadeniz Technical University
Trabzon, 61030, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (12)
Guarini D, Gracia B, Ramirez-Lobos V, Noguera-Pantoja A, Sole-Ventura P. Laser Biophotomodulation in Patients with Neurosensory Disturbance of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Jan;36(1):3-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4312. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PMID: 29022844RESULTFavaro-Pipi E, Feitosa SM, Ribeiro DA, Bossini P, Oliveira P, Parizotto NA, Renno AC. Comparative study of the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and low-level laser therapy on bone defects in tibias of rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):727-32. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0772-2. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PMID: 20521077RESULTMiloro M, Repasky M. Low-level laser effect on neurosensory recovery after sagittal ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jan;89(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)80006-2.
PMID: 10630935RESULTMoore KC., Hira N., Kumar PS., Jayakumar CS., Ohshiro T. A Double Blind Crossover Trial of low Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia. Laser Ther 2004;14:61-4. Doi: 10.5978/ISLSM.14.0_61.
RESULTKahraman SA. Low-level laser therapy in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2004 May;16(2):277-88. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2004.02.002. No abstract available.
PMID: 18088730RESULTSun G, Tuner J. Low-level laser therapy in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Oct;48(4):1061-76, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2004.05.004.
PMID: 15464564RESULTMohajerani SH, Tabeie F, Bemanali M, Tabrizi R. Effect of Low-Level Laser and Light-Emitting Diode on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Recovery After Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4):e408-e411. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002929.
PMID: 28538060RESULTOzen T, Orhan K, Gorur I, Ozturk A. Efficacy of low level laser therapy on neurosensory recovery after injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. Head Face Med. 2006 Feb 15;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-3.
PMID: 16480503RESULTRobinson PP, Loescher AR, Yates JM, Smith KG. Current management of damage to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves as a result of removal of third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Aug;42(4):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.02.024.
PMID: 15225944RESULTEsteves Pinto Faria P, Temprano A, Piva F, Sant'ana E, Pimenta D. Low-level laser therapy for neurosensory recovery after sagittal ramus osteotomy. Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Jun;69(3):141-147. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04289-2. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
PMID: 32181610RESULTMiloro M, Criddle TR. Does Low-Level Laser Therapy Affect Recovery of Lingual and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injuries? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;76(12):2669-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
PMID: 30509397RESULTLomke MA. Clinical applications of dental lasers. Gen Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):47-59.
PMID: 19146143RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2025
First Posted
March 25, 2025
Study Start
January 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 15, 2023
Study Completion
January 15, 2024
Last Updated
March 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Jan 2019 - Jan 2023