Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Temporomandibular Joint During Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion
Three-dimensional Judgment of Mandibular Condylar Volume and Position Subsequent to Twin-block Functional Therapy of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Accompanied With Low-level Laser Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
to evaluate effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on mandibular condylar volume and position after treatment of Class II malocclusion with Twin Block (TB) functional therapy via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Twenty eight growing patients, 14 boys and 14 girls ranged in age 9-12 years, were randomly divided into control group (mean initial age 10.64±1.36 years) and laser group (mean initial age 10.55 1.45 years). All patients treated with TB appliance where Gallium aluminum arsenide diode laser applied in one group weekly around TMJ region for 12 sessions in three months with set parameters: continuous 635 nm, 50 mW, 4.5J/cm2, 45 seconds/ point, total dose per side 11.25J. CBCT were obtained before and immediately after TB therapy, in addition to routine orthodontic records. Changes in TMJ and skeletal variables were analyzed and compared within and between both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2020
CompletedMay 6, 2020
May 1, 2020
1.6 years
May 2, 2020
May 3, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of condylar volume (mm3) and condylar head position before and after Twin-block therapy with and without LLLT:
3D condylar volume measured using software and 2D condylar head position
after 9 mouth from starting treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes of cephalometric skeletal measurements before and after Twin-block therapy with and without LLLT
after 9 mouth from starting treatment
Study Arms (2)
control group
NO INTERVENTION12 patients treated with twin block functional appliance without low-level laser application for 9 month
laser group
EXPERIMENTAL12 patients treated with twin block functional appliance with low-level laser application with the following set parameters; 635 nm wavelength in continuous-wave mode, 50 mw power output, 4.5 J/cm2 energy density, 11.25 J total dose per side, 45 seconds/ point, and 8 mm fiber optic tip diameter. The laser was applied at five points located within TMJ region on both right and left sides in contact with skin as follows: lateral, superior, anterior, posterior, and posterior- inferior points. Laser application was repeated weekly for three months according to a standard protocol
Interventions
In the laser group, patients received LLLT from a semiconductor Gallium Aluminum Arsenide diode laser (SMARTMPRO, LASOTRONIX, Poland) with the following set parameters; 635 nm wavelength in continuous-wave mode, 50 mw power output, 4.5 J/cm2 energy density, 11.25 J total dose per side, 45 seconds/ point, and 8 mm fiber optic tip diameter. Laser was applied (Fig.2) at five points located within TMJ region on both right and left sides in contact with skin as follows: lateral, superior, anterior, posterior, and posterior- inferior points.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Skeletal Class II (ANB°\> 5°) with the normal maxilla (SNA°=82°±4°) and retrognathic mandible (SNB°\< 78°).
- Overjet greater than 5 mm.
- Minimal crowding in dental arches (≤ 3 mm).
- The lower incisors should be on average inclination or slightly retroclined.
- All the patients were in stages II and III based on the modified cervical vertebral maturation stages(CVMS) according to Bacetti et al.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of orthodontic treatment.
- Congenitally missing or extracted permanent tooth (except third molars).
- Posterior crossbites or severe maxillary transverse deficiency.
- Severe facial asymmetry determined by clinical or radiographic examination.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Systemic diseases that may affect orthodontic treatment results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al- Azhar University,
Cairo, Cairo Nasr City, 11751, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahmoud A Mohamed, MSc student
Al-Azhar University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dentist, Ministry of Health, Egypt, MSc studentDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2020
First Posted
May 6, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 15, 2019
Study Completion
August 20, 2019
Last Updated
May 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05