NCT06886555

Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to assess the effect of early labour analgesia on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in induced labour in primiparous women with a full-term pregnancy whose labour was induced with a Cook balloon or prostaglandins. It aims to answer whether early labour analgesia (\< 4 centimetres of cervical dilation) prolongs the duration of labour. Secondary outcomes will be Incidence of caesarean section, use of oxytocin, onset of fetal heart rate abnormalities within 30 minutes of augmentation, incidence of episiotomy, amount of blood loss, need for epidural catheter repositioning due to inadequate analgesia, onset of breakthrough pain defined as need for "rescue" top-ups within 60 minutes of previous top-ups, Apgar score (at 1 and 5 minutes), neonatal umbilical pH and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Patients who received early partoanalgesia were compared for the proposed outcomes with patients who received partoanalgesia in active labour (cervical dilation \> 4 centimetres).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2022

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 19, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 19, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2025

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

February 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

neuraxil analgesiainduced labour

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of labour

    The primary objective is to compare the duration of the first stage of labour (measured in minutes) between women who received early neuraxial analgesia in the latent phase of the first stage and those who received it in the active stage. First stage duration is the time elapsed from the onset of labour, as diagnosed by an experienced obstetrician, until 10 centimetres of cervical dilation is reached. The co-primary objective is to compare the duration of the second stage (measured in minutes) between the two populations. Second stage duration is the time from 10 centimetres of cervical dilation to birth. Data on these outcomes are recorded by the obstetric team in the patient's chart during labour.

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Incidence of operative deliveries

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

  • Incidence of Episiotomy

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

  • Incidence of caesarean section during labour

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

  • Incidence of Obstetric lacerations

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

  • Oxytocin consumption

    Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

women undergoing labour induction

Procedure: Epidural analgesia for labour pain

Interventions

Patients were divided into two groups according to repertorised cervical dilatation at the start of analgesia: Group A \< 4 centimetres (latent stage according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines) and Group B between 4 and 6 centimetres.

women undergoing labour induction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailspregnancy
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

women with induced labour undergoing epidual analgesia

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years;
  • Primipara;
  • Single pregnancy;
  • Gestational age \> 36 weeks;
  • Induced labour with Bishop Score \< 6;
  • Cervical dilatation at start of analgesia ≤ 6 cm;
  • ASA Class 2.

You may not qualify if:

  • Endouterine fetal death;
  • Anhydramnios:
  • Trial labour after caesarean section;
  • Cardiotocogram class ≥2 before start of analgesia;
  • Third trimester bleeding;
  • Patient refusal;
  • Inability to understand informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, SC AR3 - Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Postchirurgica

Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Simpson KR. Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction and Augmentation, 5th Edition. Nurs Womens Health. 2020 Aug;24(4):S1-S41. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2020.04.005.

    PMID: 32778395BACKGROUND
  • Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Gerber SE, Yaghmour EA. Early compared with late neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113(5):1066-1074. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1a9a8.

    PMID: 19384122BACKGROUND
  • Ohel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821.

    PMID: 16522386BACKGROUND
  • Sng BL, Sia ATH. Maintenance of epidural labour analgesia: The old, the new and the future. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;31(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

    PMID: 28625301BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Analgesia, Epidural

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical doctor- Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2025

First Posted

March 20, 2025

Study Start

October 21, 2022

Primary Completion

December 19, 2024

Study Completion

December 19, 2024

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations