Impact of Timing of Neuraxial Analgesia on Obstetric, Anesthesiologic and Neonatal Outcomes in Induced Labour
TAIL
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this observational study is to assess the effect of early labour analgesia on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in induced labour in primiparous women with a full-term pregnancy whose labour was induced with a Cook balloon or prostaglandins. It aims to answer whether early labour analgesia (\< 4 centimetres of cervical dilation) prolongs the duration of labour. Secondary outcomes will be Incidence of caesarean section, use of oxytocin, onset of fetal heart rate abnormalities within 30 minutes of augmentation, incidence of episiotomy, amount of blood loss, need for epidural catheter repositioning due to inadequate analgesia, onset of breakthrough pain defined as need for "rescue" top-ups within 60 minutes of previous top-ups, Apgar score (at 1 and 5 minutes), neonatal umbilical pH and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Patients who received early partoanalgesia were compared for the proposed outcomes with patients who received partoanalgesia in active labour (cervical dilation \> 4 centimetres).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2022
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2025
CompletedMarch 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.2 years
February 25, 2025
March 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of labour
The primary objective is to compare the duration of the first stage of labour (measured in minutes) between women who received early neuraxial analgesia in the latent phase of the first stage and those who received it in the active stage. First stage duration is the time elapsed from the onset of labour, as diagnosed by an experienced obstetrician, until 10 centimetres of cervical dilation is reached. The co-primary objective is to compare the duration of the second stage (measured in minutes) between the two populations. Second stage duration is the time from 10 centimetres of cervical dilation to birth. Data on these outcomes are recorded by the obstetric team in the patient's chart during labour.
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Incidence of operative deliveries
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
Incidence of Episiotomy
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
Incidence of caesarean section during labour
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
Incidence of Obstetric lacerations
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
Oxytocin consumption
Perioperative/Periprocedural. The investigator traces the information examining the medical chart in a time frame from one day after birth until 6 month from study termination.
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
women undergoing labour induction
Interventions
Patients were divided into two groups according to repertorised cervical dilatation at the start of analgesia: Group A \< 4 centimetres (latent stage according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines) and Group B between 4 and 6 centimetres.
Eligibility Criteria
women with induced labour undergoing epidual analgesia
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years;
- Primipara;
- Single pregnancy;
- Gestational age \> 36 weeks;
- Induced labour with Bishop Score \< 6;
- Cervical dilatation at start of analgesia ≤ 6 cm;
- ASA Class 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Endouterine fetal death;
- Anhydramnios:
- Trial labour after caesarean section;
- Cardiotocogram class ≥2 before start of analgesia;
- Third trimester bleeding;
- Patient refusal;
- Inability to understand informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, SC AR3 - Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Postchirurgica
Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Simpson KR. Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction and Augmentation, 5th Edition. Nurs Womens Health. 2020 Aug;24(4):S1-S41. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2020.04.005.
PMID: 32778395BACKGROUNDWong CA, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Gerber SE, Yaghmour EA. Early compared with late neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113(5):1066-1074. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1a9a8.
PMID: 19384122BACKGROUNDOhel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821.
PMID: 16522386BACKGROUNDSng BL, Sia ATH. Maintenance of epidural labour analgesia: The old, the new and the future. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;31(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28625301BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical doctor- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2025
First Posted
March 20, 2025
Study Start
October 21, 2022
Primary Completion
December 19, 2024
Study Completion
December 19, 2024
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03