24-Hour Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary Versus Gel for Labour Induction
A Randomised Controlled Trial of 24-Hours Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary vs. Gel for Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancies With a Bishop Score ≤4
1 other identifier
interventional
133
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of induction of labour is to initiate labour when maternal and fetal conditions necessitate delivery before the onset of spontaneous contractions. Prostaglandins are widely used for induction of labour, and can be administered orally, vaginally, intracervically, endovenously and by extra-amniotic or intra-amniotic routes. Dinoprostone is one of the synthetic prostaglandins most commonly used to achieve cervical ripening and labour induction, and can be administered as tablets, suppositories, gel (vaginal and intracervical) or as a controlled-release intravaginal pessary. The controlled-release pessary has some potential advantages: a single application is required; the insert is easily administered and can be removed as soon as labour starts or if complications ensue. Studies comparing the dinoprostone vaginal insert to other prostaglandin formulations have shown variable results, probably influenced by drug administration regimens, indications for induction, and cervical conditions of the women. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the induction of labour using dinoprostone in patients with an unfavourable cervix, and to compare the efficacy and the cost of 24-hours controlled-release dinoprostone pessary and intravaginal dinoprostone gel.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2009
CompletedFebruary 13, 2009
February 1, 2009
1.2 years
February 12, 2009
February 12, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
spontaneous vaginal delivery
Secondary Outcomes (8)
induction to labour time
induction to delivery time
rate of failed induction
cost per patient
rate of caesarean section for fetal heart rate abnormalities
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL24-hours vaginal dinoprostone pessary
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORVaginal dinoprostone gel
Interventions
10 mg controlled-release dinoprostone pessary applied for 24 hours
2 mg vaginal dinoprostone gel, two daily doses with a 6 hours interval
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- singleton pregnancy, fetal cephalic presentation, Bishop score ≤ 4, gestational age 37-42 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- premature rupture of the membranes, history of a previous caesarean section,
- maternal clinical contraindications to the administration of prostaglandins,
- fetal malpresentation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Brescia
Brescia, 25123, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2009
First Posted
February 13, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 13, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02