Effects of Combined Training Protocol in Volleyball Players
SSGs+PL+JR
Effects of a 12-Week Combined Training Protocols on Aerobic Fitness, Technical Skills, and Psychophysiological Responses in Young Recreational Volleyball Players
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The 12-week training will take place during the preparation period. At the beginning and end of the 12-week period, vertical jump test, 60 seconds countermovement jump (CMJ) test, change of direction (T-Agility) test, sprint test, YO-YO (level-1) test will be applied in terms of performance test. In terms of skill testing, service test and spiking test protocols will be applied. Players will perform plyometric (PL) or jump rope (JR) training with the same amount of total training time in each training session. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be obtained using (CR6-20). All players will also complete the short form of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2025
CompletedMarch 19, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 months
March 8, 2025
March 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Vertical Jump
Change in vertical jump (cm) is expected from baseline assessment to 12-week follow-up assessment
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
60s Countermovement Jump
Change in countermovement jump (watts/kg) is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment..
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Change of Direction
Changes in change of direction times (sec) are expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
Sprint
Change in Sprint (km/h) is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1
A change in VO2max values from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment is expected.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Service
A change in service test values from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment is expected.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Spiking
A change in spiking test values is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE)
Changes in Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) are expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment. The scale has a range of 6-20 (CR20). Athletes will indicate whether they do not find exercise difficult (6) or find it difficult (20).
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
PAGES
Changes are expected in the Enjoyment of physical activity scale (PACES) from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment. The scale consists of 8 questions with a score range of 1-7. Athletes will indicate whether they do not enjoy exercise (1) or enjoy it (7).
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Other Outcomes (4)
Anthropometric Measurements 1
Baseline
Anthropometric Measurements 2
Baseline
Anthropometric Measurements 3
Baseline
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Pliometric Training
EXPERIMENTALPlayers will receive a Plyometric training program at the beginning of the Volleyball training session for a period of 15 minutes, two days a week.
Jump Rope training
EXPERIMENTALPlayers will receive a jump rope training program at the beginning of the volleyball training session for 15 minutes, two days a week.
Small Sided Games
EXPERIMENTALMore complex, skill-based conditioning exercises for volleyball are small-sided games (2v2, 3v3) and competition drills (6v6).
Interventions
The full intervention program will cover 12 weeks in the season. Prior to training, players will be instructed to warm-up for ten minutes with general running exercises and dynamic stretching. The plyometric training intervention will consist of 5 exercises performed in the following order: Leap forward and backward on the line, leap sideways on the line, double leg knee to chest, split squat jump, and squat jump (Bavli, 2012). A volleyball coach will monitor the whole training.
The entire intervention program will last for 12 weeks during the season. Before training, players will be instructed to warm up with general running exercises and dynamic stretching for ten minutes. The jump rope intervention will consist of 5 exercises performed in the following order: basic jump step, double leg double jump, double leg jump left and right, double leg jump forward and backward, and scissor steps (Trecroci et al., 2015). Each exercise will be performed by all participants using a jump rope with the same characteristics in terms of weight (e.g. 230g), length (e.g. shoulder size) and material (e.g. PVC, Polyvinyl Chloride). A metronome speed of 120 beats per minute will be used to ensure equal exercise intensity in both exercise programs Furthermore, a volleyball coach will monitor the entire workout.
More complex, skill-based conditioning exercises for volleyball are small-sided games (2v2, 3v3) and competition drills (6v6). Although the duration of each rally in these drills is not controlled by the coach, the total duration of the drill will be recorded to aid in-session and inter-session planning. Total repetitions will be easily measured by adding up the total points played in the rally and then multiplying by the number of rallies per point. The coach will create an emotionally intense environment by applying a scoring system (e.g. team winning 2 out of 3 rallies gets 1 big point, 5 seconds rest) and encouraging the players (Trajkovic et al., 2012).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being healthy
- Male volleyball athletes
- Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions
You may not qualify if:
- Being under 18 years old
- Having a chronic disease
- Contraindications for exercise
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karabuk University
Karabük, Turkey, 78200, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Fathi A, Hammami R, Moran J, Borji R, Sahli S, Rebai H. Effect of a 16-Week Combined Strength and Plyometric Training Program Followed by a Detraining Period on Athletic Performance in Pubertal Volleyball Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Aug;33(8):2117-2127. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002461.
PMID: 29401199BACKGROUNDOzer D, Duzgun I, Baltaci G, Karacan S, Colakoglu F. The effects of rope or weighted rope jump training on strength, coordination and proprioception in adolescent female volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Jun;51(2):211-9.
PMID: 21681154BACKGROUNDVoelzke M, Stutzig N, Thorhauer HA, Granacher U. Promoting lower extremity strength in elite volleyball players: effects of two combined training methods. J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Sep;15(5):457-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
PMID: 22484082BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Neslihan Akçay, Doctorate
Karabuk University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were strictly separated and think their intervention is the main intervention. The same is true for care providers. Outcome assessors were unaware of participant group status and were not allowed to ask correspondingly
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2025
First Posted
March 13, 2025
Study Start
March 8, 2025
Primary Completion
May 15, 2025
Study Completion
May 29, 2025
Last Updated
March 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03