Clinical Performance of High Viscosity Bioactive Injectable Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
Randomized
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Using a bioactive resin composite in subgingival Class II cavities can provide enhanced caries resistance by releasing multiple ions, including fluoride. This approach offers greater resistance to caries due to the incorporation of surface pre-reacted glass filler (S-PRG) technology (Imazato, Nakatsuka et al., 2023). This type of composite may improve the outcomes of deep subgingival margin elevation, benefiting both restorative success and periodontal health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedMarch 13, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
March 7, 2025
March 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrent caries
* 0: no evidence of caries continuous along the margin * 1: caries evident continuous with the margin of restoration
T (Time): T1: 1 week hours Baseline T2: 6 Months T3: 12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
1. Post-operative sensitivity. 2. Fracture of Restoration. 3. Bleeding on probing
T (Time): T1: 1 week hours Baseline T2: 6 Months T3: 12 Months
Study Arms (2)
Bioactive injectable giomer
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeep margin elevation and subsequent restoration will be done using bioactive giomer material
Nanohybrid injectable composite
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Nanohybrid resin composite is a type of restorative material that features nano-sized fillers as a main component
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult Patient (20-50 years old)
- Good oral hygiene (plaque index 0 or 1)
- Patient approval
- Absence of parafunctional habits and/or bruxism
- No endodontic treatment
- No abscess
- No partial or fixed denture
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known allergic or adverse reaction to the tested materials.
- Bad oral hygiene
- Systematic disease that may affect participation.
- Xerostomic patients.
- Patients with active periodontal disease.
- Heavy smokers (those who smoke greater than or equal to 25 or more cigarettes a day)
- Orthodontic treatment patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (16)
Imazato S, Nakatsuka T, Kitagawa H, Sasaki JI, Yamaguchi S, Ito S, Takeuchi H, Nomura R, Nakano K. Multiple-Ion Releasing Bioactive Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-Ionomer (S-PRG) Filler: Innovative Technology for Dental Treatment and Care. J Funct Biomater. 2023 Apr 21;14(4):236. doi: 10.3390/jfb14040236.
PMID: 37103326BACKGROUNDTakatsuka T, Hirano J, Matsumoto H, Honma T. X-ray absorption fine structure analysis of the local environment of zinc in dentine treated with zinc compounds. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Apr;113(2):180-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00194.x.
PMID: 15819827BACKGROUNDYoneda M, Suzuki N, Masuo Y, Fujimoto A, Iha K, Yamada K, Iwamoto T, Hirofuji T. Effect of S-PRG Eluate on Biofilm Formation and Enzyme Activity of Oral Bacteria. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:814913. doi: 10.1155/2012/814913. Epub 2012 May 27.
PMID: 22693508BACKGROUNDAlmeida Ayres AP, Tabchoury CP, Bittencourt Berger S, Yamauti M, Bovi Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Effect of Fluoride-containing Restorative Materials on Dentin Adhesion and Demineralization of Hard Tissues Adjacent to Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(4):337-45. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34555.
PMID: 26258176BACKGROUNDBasheer RR, Hasanain FA, Abuelenain DA. Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04333-3.
PMID: 38730400BACKGROUNDElderiny HM, Khallaf YS, Akah MM, Hassanein OE. Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite vs Conventional Nanohybrid Composite in Posterior Restorations: An 18-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):794-802. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3737.
PMID: 39653674BACKGROUNDJung JH, Park SH. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites. Oper Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):375-386. doi: 10.2341/16-254-L. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PMID: 28402737BACKGROUNDEggmann F, Ayub JM, Conejo J, Blatz MB. Deep margin elevation-Present status and future directions. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):26-47. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13008. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
PMID: 36602272BACKGROUNDTY - JOUR AU - Yadav, Seema PY - 2021/11/26 SP - 20 EP - 21 T1 - DENTAL DEFECTS WITH SUBGINGIVAL EXTENSION: A RESTORATIVE CONUNDRUM VL - 10 DO - 10.36106/ijsr/9500645 JO - International Journal of Scientific Research ER -
BACKGROUNDEltahlah D, Lynch CD, Chadwick BL, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent. 2018 May;72:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
PMID: 29522787BACKGROUNDTY - JOUR AU - Salah, Zahraa AU - Sleibi, Ahmed AU - Bissasu, Sami PY - 2024/06/30 SP - 124 EP - 137 T1 - Materials used for deep margin elevation (Review article) VL - 20 DO - 10.32828/mdj.v20i1.898 JO - Mustansiria Dental Journal ER -
BACKGROUNDTY - JOUR AU - Magne, Pascal AU - Spreafico, R.C. PY - 2012/01/01 SP - 86 EP - 96 T1 - Deep margin elevation: A paradigm shift VL - 2 JO - Amer J Esthet Dent ER -
BACKGROUNDVeneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010 Spring;5(1):50-76.
PMID: 20305873BACKGROUNDTY - JOUR AU - Alhumaidan, Ghaida AU - Alammar, Raghad AU - Alasmari, Dhafer AU - Alenezi, Ali PY - 2022/01/16 SP - 100034 T1 - Clinical performance of indirect restorations with cervical margin relocation in posterior teeth: A systematic review VL - 2 DO - 10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100034 JO - Dentistry Review ER -
BACKGROUNDTY - JOUR AU - Ingamells, Hannah AU - Golenia, Katie AU - Puryer, James AU - Dorri, Mojtaba PY - 2018/01/02 SP - 24 EP - 29 T1 - Prevalence of proximal caries in adults and children at Bristol Dental Hospital and South Bristol Community Hospital VL - 9 DO - 10.1308/rcsfdj.2018.24 JO - Faculty Dental Journal ER -
BACKGROUNDTY - CHAP AU - Anil, Aiswarya AU - Ibraheem, Wael AU - Meshni, Abdullah AU - Preethanath, Reghunathan AU - Anil, Sukumaran PY - 2022/09/26 SP - SN - 978-1-80356-359-6 T1 - Demineralization and Remineralization Dynamics and Dental Caries VL - DO - 10.5772/intechopen.105847 ER -
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dentist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2025
First Posted
March 13, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03